Literature DB >> 31484586

Acute kidney injury secondary to thrombotic microangiopathy associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.

Diana Curras-Martin1, Swapnil Patel2, Huzaif Qaisar2, Sushil K Mehandru2, Avais Masud2, Mohammad A Hossain2, Gurpreet S Lamba2, Harry Dounis2, Michael Levitt2, Arif Asif2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal involvement in idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome is uncommon. The mechanism of kidney damage can be explained as occurring via two distinct pathways: (1) thromboembolic ischemic changes secondary to endocardial disruption mediated by eosinophilic cytotoxicity to the myocardium and (2) direct eosinophilic cytotoxic effect to the kidney. CASE
PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 63-year-old Caucasian man who presented to our hospital with 2 weeks of progressively generalized weakness. He was diagnosed with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome with multiorgan involvement and acute kidney injury with biopsy-proven thrombotic microangiopathy. Full remission was achieved after 8 weeks of corticosteroid therapy.
CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed to investigate if age and absence of frank thrombocytopenia can serve as a prognostic feature of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, as seen in this case.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eosinophilic cytotoxicity; Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome; Thrombotic microangiopathy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31484586      PMCID: PMC6727329          DOI: 10.1186/s13256-019-2187-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Case Rep        ISSN: 1752-1947


Introduction

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is characterized by an absolute eosinophil count greater than 1500 cells/mm3 observed at least twice with a minimum interval of 4 weeks, multiorgan involvement, and presence of tissue damage without an identifiable underlying cause [1]. Renal involvement in HES varies from 7% to 36%; however, kidney injury mediated by thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is rare [2]. To the best of our knowledge, only two cases of idiopathic HES [3] and one case of myeloproliferative-variant HES [4] have been reported. None of the reported cases achieved normal kidney function after treatment. The pathophysiology of renal impairment in HES can be explained by two mechanisms: (1) an ischemic kidney injury secondary to cardiac mural thrombus mediated by eosinophilic cytotoxicity to the heart (endocardium and myocardium) and (2) direct eosinophilic cytotoxic effect to the kidney [2-5]. We present a rare case of idiopathic HES with multiorgan failure and renal biopsy-proven TMA in which complete remission was achieved after 8 weeks of steroid therapy.

Case presentation

A 63-year-old Caucasian man presented to our hospital with 2 weeks of progressive generalized weakness, vague abdominal discomfort, and dyspnea on exertion requiring more frequent use of his inhaler. He did not report similar symptoms in the past, and he denied any associated chest pain, cough, changes in bowel habits, fevers, chills, weight loss, recent travel, tick bites, or sick contacts. His past medical history was relevant for chronic bronchitis diagnosed 10 years ago. He was a former one-pack-per-day smoker for 20 years. His family history was noncontributory.

Clinical findings

The patient’s vital signs at presentation showed a blood pressure of 128/84 mmHg, heart rate of 75 beats/minute, respiratory rate of 18 breaths/minute, oxygen saturation of 99% on room air, and body temperature of 97.7 °F. On physical examination, the patient was in no apparent distress and was awake, alert, and oriented to person, place, and time. His heart and lung examination revealed sinus tachycardia and diffuse expiratory wheezes throughout the lung fields. The patient’s abdominal examination was pertinent for a nonperitonitic tenderness to palpation in the left upper quadrant. His neurological examination was remarkable for weakness in the right upper extremity. His laboratory data are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Laboratory data during hospitalization

BiochemistryResultsReference values
Sodium133136–145 mmol/L
Potassium4.03.5–5.2 mmol/L
Chloride10196–110 mmol/L
Bicarbonate2224–31 mmol/L
Blood urea nitrogen175–25 mg/dl
Creatinine1.30.61–1.24 mg/dl
Glomerular filtration rate56> 60 ml/minute
Glucose8770–99 mg/dl
Protein, total6.96.0–8.5 g/dl
Albumin2.83.5–4.7 g/dl
Aspartate aminotransferase4010–42 IU/L
Alanine transaminase5110–60 IU/L
Alkaline phosphatase12838–126 IU/L
Total bilirubin2.00.2–1.3 mg/dl
Lactate dehydrogenase34391–200 IU/L
Haptoglobin4140–268 mg/dl
Troponin I0.13> 0.08 ng/ml
Procalcitonin0.11< 0.05 ng/ml; low-risk sepsis
Complete blood count
 Hemoglobin10.012.0–17.5 g/dl
 Hematocrit30.236–53
 Red cell distribution width17.011.5–15.0%
 Mean corpuscular hemoglobin28.926.0–34.0 pg
 Platelets190140–450 × 103/μl
 White cell count22.24.5–11.0 × 103/μl
 Neutrophil count4.81.50–7.50 × 103/μl
 Eosinophil count16.20.00–0.50 × 103/μl
 Erythrocyte sedimentation rate320–15 mm/hour
 International normalized ratio1.150.88–1.15
Laboratory data during hospitalization

Timeline

See Fig. 1 for the timeline of the patient’s kidney function and absolute eosinophil count while receiving steroid treatment.
Fig. 1

Kidney function and absolute eosinophil count evolution on steroid treatment. GFR Glomerular Filtration Rate

Kidney function and absolute eosinophil count evolution on steroid treatment. GFR Glomerular Filtration Rate

Diagnostic assessment

Findings of computed tomography (CT) of the patient’s brain were unremarkable. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of his brain revealed subacute infarcts involving the left frontal white matter and left cerebellum; in addition, an evolving subacute infarct was seen in the left corona radiata. CT of the chest demonstrated diffuse ground-glass opacity, and CT of the abdomen was remarkable for a wedge-shaped area of low attenuation in the spleen consistent with splenic infarct. His transthoracic echocardiogram revealed a mural apical thrombus in the left ventricular (LV) apex with reduced ejection fraction (31–35%). Cardiac MRI performed 7 days after anticoagulation therapy was initiated showed a diffuse subendocardial scarring of the middle to apical LV segments and the right ventricular side of the septum. It also revealed evidence of edema of the middle anteroseptum and apical septum, consistent with endomyocardial fibrosis. However, no mural thrombus was visualized. A presumptive diagnosis of HES was made on the basis of presenting symptoms, laboratory data, and imaging studies. Investigation for secondary causes, including immunological testing (Table 2), blood and urine cultures, ova and parasites, and infectious serology (Table 3), were unrevealing, and results of urine drug screening were negative. Bone marrow biopsy demonstrated a normocellular bone marrow population with eosinophilia comprising 60–70%, without evidence of lymphoproliferative disorder or metastatic neoplasm. Cytogenetic analysis was unrevealing: negative for breakpoint cluster region-Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (BCR-ABL1) fusion, eosinophilia-associated platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA), platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRB), fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) mutation, and JAK2 pericentriolar material 1 (PCM1) fusion.
Table 2

Immunological test results

Autoimmune serologyResultsReference values
Antinuclear antibody0.50< 0.90, negative
Anti-double-stranded DNA antibody1< 4 IU/ml, negative
Serine protease 3 antibody10–19 AU/ml
Antineutrophil antibodyPositiveNegative
Myeloperoxidase antibodyNot detected< 1.0, not detected
Histone antibody IgG0.60.0–0.9 units
Cardiolipin IgA0.00–11 units
Cardiolipin IgM7.0< 20 units, negative
Complement
 C415.6 → 15.416–40 mg/dl
 C391.7 → 7785–170 mg/dl
Immunoglobulins
 IgG1240600–1560 mg/dl
 IgM61400–300 mg/dl
 IgA10470–450 mg/dl
 IgE259< 214 Ku/L

DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid, Ig G Immunoglobulin G, Ig M Immunoglobulin M, Ig A Immunoglobulin A, Ig E Immunoglobulin E

Table 3

Infectious disease test results

Infectious serologyResultsReference values
Human immunodeficiency virusNegativeNegative
Hepatitis C virusNegativeNegative
Hepatitis A virus IgMNegativeNegative
Hepatitis D virusNegativeNegative
Hepatitis B core IgMNegativeNegative
Hepatitis B surface antibodyNegativeNegative
Hepatitis B surface antigenNegativeNegative
QuantiFERON interpretationIndeterminate
QuantiFERON-TB0.000.00 IU/ml
Aspergillus antigenNot detected
Aspergillus fumigatus IgGNegativeNegative
Micropolyspora faeni IgGNegativeNegative
Pigeon serumNegativeNegative
Thermoactinomyces candidus NegativeNegative
Thymus vulgaris NegativeNegative
Setaria viridis NegativeNegative
Strongyloides antibodyNegativeNegative

IgG Immunoglobulin G, Ig M Immunoglobulin M

Immunological test results DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid, Ig G Immunoglobulin G, Ig M Immunoglobulin M, Ig A Immunoglobulin A, Ig E Immunoglobulin E Infectious disease test results IgG Immunoglobulin G, Ig M Immunoglobulin M Due to the stigma of hemolysis (normocytic acute anemia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and bilirubin, positive schistocytes with relative thrombocytopenia), further investigation was pursued. The result of the Coombs test (direct and indirect) was negative. A disintegrin-like and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13 (ADAMTS13) activity level was greater than 50%, and the expression of complement regulatory proteins CD59 and CD55 on erythrocytes was within normal limits as determined by flow cytometry. Due to a further decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) early in the patient’s hospital course, a kidney biopsy was pursued. Renal biopsy revealed a glomerular and vascular TMA, interstitial fibrosis, and inflammation with focal eosinophils (Fig. 1). IHC staining for eosinophil granule major basic protein 1 (MBP1) was not performed.

Therapeutic intervention

Our patient was started on prednisone 1 mg/kg daily and a heparin protocol at 18 U/kg/hour with an activated partial thromboplastin time goal of 60–100 seconds. Simultaneously, warfarin was initiated. Once the patient’s international normalized ratio was within therapeutic range (2.0–3.0), he was anticoagulated with heparin and warfarin for an additional 48 hours. His eosinophil count and estimated GFR were monitored on an outpatient basis, and his prednisone dose was gradually tapered. After the eighth week, the patient was maintained on 5 mg of prednisone daily.

Follow-up and outcomes

By the time the renal biopsy report was available, the patient’s kidney function had started to recover; hence, no further intervention was required. After initiation of treatment with steroids, the patient achieved resolution of pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic, and abdominal symptoms. Repeat echocardiography after 5 weeks showed improvement of LV ejection fraction to 50–55%. Complete normalization of eosinophil count and renal function was observed after 4 and 8 weeks of therapy, respectively (Fig. 1). At his 10-week follow-up, the patient continued to do well under close surveillance for renal and cardiac complications. At 12-month follow-up, he continued to have a normal eosinophil count and renal function. However, cardiac MRI showed persistent endocardial fibrosis.

Discussion

HES is an uncommon disorder, marked by overproduction of eosinophils, eosinophilia greater than 1500/mm3, tissue infiltration, and organ damage. Idiopathic HES requires exclusion of primary and secondary causes of hypereosinophilia as well as lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilia [1]. For the period from 2001 to 2005, the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program reported an age-adjusted incidence of 0.036 per 100,000 person-years for myeloproliferative HES. The incidence of idiopathic HES remains obscure [6]. The most common presenting symptoms are weakness, fatigue, cough, and dyspnea, followed by fever, rash, rhinitis, and in rare cases angioedema [7]. The mortality of HES is close to 10%, with the leading cause of death attributed to cardiac events followed by thromboembolic phenomena [8]. The pathogenesis of HES is mediated by “piecemeal degranulation” or eosinophil activation and secretion of the granule cationic proteins (such as eosinophil peroxidase, eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, and MBP1) and eosinophil-expressed cytokines (such as RANTES [regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted] and interleukin [4, 9]). Eosinophil granule cationic proteins have the capability to activate inflammatory cells such as mast cells to induce inflammatory mediators and direct tissue-damaging cytotoxicity. These multiple proinflammatory activities lead to endothelial damage, thrombosis by activation of complement and coagulation cascade, and direct platelet stimulation and downregulation of thrombomodulin by MBP1 [5, 9]. Renal involvement in idiopathic HES is a rare entity, with only a handful of cases reported in the medical literature (Table 4) [10-21]. TMA is a life-threatening syndrome of systemic microvascular occlusions and is characterized by sudden or gradual onset of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and renal or other end-organ damage [22]. It has been associated with diverse diseases and syndromes, such as systemic infections, cancer, pregnancy complications (for example, preeclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP [hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count] syndrome), autoimmune disorders (for example, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, antiphospholipid syndrome), hematopoietic stem cell or organ transplant, severe hypertension, and cocaine-induced [22, 23]. Liapis et al. first reported two cases of TMA associated with idiopathic HES, along with a third case of myeloproliferative variant of HES in association with TMA [3] (Table 5). Of the cases described by Liapis et al., none had full renal recovery. In contrast, our patient did remarkably well with steroid and anticoagulation therapy. After discharge, his eosinophil count remained stable with resolution of renal injury with prednisone.
Table 4

Renal pathology in hypereosinophilia

Patient age and sexDiagnosisRenal pathologyReference
14-year-old femaleIdiopathic HESThromboembolismSpry [10]
50-year-old maleIdiopathic HESNecrotizing IgA nephropathyShah et al. [11]
40-year-old maleIdiopathic HESInterstitial nephritisBulucu et al. [12]
67-year-old womanIdiopathic HESCrescentic glomerulonephritisRichardson et al. [13]
18-year-old maleEosinophilic gastroenteritisImmunotactoid glomerulonephritisChoi et al. [14]
55-year-old maleIdiopathic HESInterstitial nephritis, focal segmental glomerulosclerosisMotellon et al. [15]
73-year-old maleIdiopathic HESIschemic changes, interstitial nephritisNavarro et al. [16]
42-year-old maleHESRenal InfarctSmith et al. [17]
59-year-old maleHESInterstitial nephritisGarella et al. [18]
80-year-old femaleIdiopathic HESTTPOhguchi et al. [19]
40-year-old maleIdiopathic HESATN, Charcot-Leyden crystalluriaHirszel et al. [20]
52-year-old maleIdiopathic HESMembranous glomerulonephritisFrigui et al. [21]

HES Hypereosinophilic syndrome, IgA Immunoglobulin A, ATN Acute tubular necrosis, TTP Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Table 5

Reported thrombotic microangiopathy cases: comparative table

DemographicsOur patientHistorical 1 [3]Historical 2 [3]Historical 3 [4]
SexMaleMaleMaleMale
Age, years63152624
RaceCaucasianAfrican AmericanCaucasianCaucasian
CBC at admission
 Hemoglobin 12.0–17.5 g/dl10.09.813.310.7
 Platelets 140–450 × 103/μl235a76101130
 White cell count 4.5–11.0 × 103/μl22.223.714.723.5
Differential count, %
 Neutrophils 1.50–7.50 × 103/μl4.88.36.7Not available
 Lymphocytes 1.50–3.70 × 103/μl0.92.82.6Not available
 Monocytes 0.20–1.00 × 103/μl0.20.70.4Not available
 Eosinophils 0.00–0.50 × 103/μl16.211.14.918.3
SchistocytesPositiveNot availablePositivePositive
Renal function test at admission
 Creatinine 0.61–1.24 mg/dl1.310.92.21.81
GFR56Not available5750
 Percentage eosinophils in bone marrow60%80%44%37%
 Renal biopsy

Glomerular capillary thrombosis

Mesangiolysis

Endotheliosis

Eosinophilic infiltrate

Arterial thrombosis

Mesangiolysis

Eosinophilic infiltrate

Arteriolar thrombosis

Glomerular capillary thrombosis

Eosinophilic infiltrate

Arteriolar thrombosis

Glomerular capillary thrombosis

Eosinophilic infiltrate

Urinalysis
 ProteinuriaNegativePresentPresentPresent
 Red blood cells/high-power field2050Not available100
 Eosinophils/high-power fieldNoneNone7None
 TreatmentPrednisone

Prednisone

Rituximab

Prednisone

Imatinib

Imatinib
 Follow-upAt 2 monthsAt 6 monthsAt 12 monthsAt 12 months
 Creatinine 0.61–1.24 mg/dl1.185.21.81.7

*Our patient’s platelets at baseline: 377–348 × 103/μl

CBC Complete Blood Count, GFR Glomerular Filtration Rate

Renal pathology in hypereosinophilia HES Hypereosinophilic syndrome, IgA Immunoglobulin A, ATN Acute tubular necrosis, TTP Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura Reported thrombotic microangiopathy cases: comparative table Glomerular capillary thrombosis Mesangiolysis Endotheliosis Eosinophilic infiltrate Arterial thrombosis Mesangiolysis Eosinophilic infiltrate Arteriolar thrombosis Glomerular capillary thrombosis Eosinophilic infiltrate Arteriolar thrombosis Glomerular capillary thrombosis Eosinophilic infiltrate Prednisone Rituximab Prednisone Imatinib *Our patient’s platelets at baseline: 377–348 × 103/μl CBC Complete Blood Count, GFR Glomerular Filtration Rate The mechanism of kidney damage in TMA with HES can occur via two different pathways: (1) direct eosinophilic cytotoxic effects to the renal vasculature and (2) ischemia secondary to thromboembolic events due to endocardial disruption. Subsequently, endothelial damage and complement cascade activation will result in TMA [1, 2, 5]. Similarly to our patient’s case and cases reported previously, Spry [10] reported that one of every five patients with HES developed hypertension and some degree of proteinuria. However, the described patients presented late in the course of HES and most likely had ischemic changes to the kidney secondary to cardioembolism rather than intrinsic eosinophilic cytotoxicity [2]. A multicenter analysis demonstrated that steroids alone induced partial or complete response at 4 weeks of treatment in 85% of the patients [24]. It was also observed that patients with positive factor interacting with PAPOLA [poly(A) polymerase alpha] and CPSF1 (cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor) (FIP1L1)–PDGFRA gene fusion had a higher response to imatinib than those without [24]. It has been hypothesized that the deletion of genetic material as occurs in HES may result in gain of fusion proteins [25]. We report the only patient treated solely with a steroid, and a complete resolution of acute kidney injury was achieved, in contrast to previously reported cases. We hypothesize that factors such as the patient’s age group, proteinuria, and relative thrombocytopenia might be important to consider as prognostic factors.

Conclusion

TMA of the kidney in association with idiopathic HES is rare. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of HES with multiorgan involvement that was successfully treated with a corticosteroid alone. Further studies are needed to investigate if age, absence of frank thrombocytopenia, and proteinuria can serve as prognostic features, as seen in our patient’s case.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Inflammatory cell activation by eosinophil granule proteins.

Authors:  L L Thomas; S M Page
Journal:  Chem Immunol       Date:  2000

2.  Renal involvement in a patient with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  F Bulucu; C Can; V Inal; Y Baykal; S Erikçi
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 0.975

Review 3.  Mechanisms of eosinophilia in the pathogenesis of hypereosinophilic disorders.

Authors:  Steven J Ackerman; Bruce S Bochner
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Renal infarction in hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  A Smith; S L Fernando
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.048

5.  Thrombotic microangiopathy associated with the hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  Helen Liapis; Albert K Ho; Diane Brown; Graeme Mindel; Gerald Gleich
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 6.  Membranous glomerulopathy associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  Makram Frigui; Mohamed Ben Hmida; Moez Jallouli; Manel Kechaou; Faten Frikha; Zouhir Bahloul
Journal:  Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl       Date:  2010-03

7.  A tyrosine kinase created by fusion of the PDGFRA and FIP1L1 genes as a therapeutic target of imatinib in idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  Jan Cools; Daniel J DeAngelo; Jason Gotlib; Elizabeth H Stover; Robert D Legare; Jorges Cortes; Jeffrey Kutok; Jennifer Clark; Ilene Galinsky; James D Griffin; Nicholas C P Cross; Ayalew Tefferi; James Malone; Rafeul Alam; Stanley L Schrier; Janet Schmid; Michal Rose; Peter Vandenberghe; Gregor Verhoef; Marc Boogaerts; Iwona Wlodarska; Hagop Kantarjian; Peter Marynen; Steven E Coutre; Richard Stone; D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Incidence of myeloproliferative hypereosinophilic syndrome in the United States and an estimate of all hypereosinophilic syndrome incidence.

Authors:  Martin M Crane; Cindy Ma Chang; Monica G Kobayashi; Peter F Weller
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura complicated with hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  Hiroto Ohguchi; Tomohiro Sugawara; Hideo Harigae
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 1.271

10.  Hypereosinophilic syndrome: a multicenter, retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and response to therapy.

Authors:  Princess U Ogbogu; Bruce S Bochner; Joseph H Butterfield; Gerald J Gleich; Johannes Huss-Marp; Jean Emmanuel Kahn; Kristin M Leiferman; Thomas B Nutman; Florian Pfab; Johannes Ring; Marc E Rothenberg; Florence Roufosse; Marie-Helene Sajous; Javed Sheikh; Dagmar Simon; Hans-Uwe Simon; Miguel L Stein; Andrew Wardlaw; Peter F Weller; Amy D Klion
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.