| Literature DB >> 31483849 |
Natsuko Satomi-Tsushita1, Akihiko Shimomura1,2, Juntaro Matsuzaki3, Yusuke Yamamoto3, Junpei Kawauchi3,4, Satoko Takizawa3,4, Yoshiaki Aoki5, Hiromi Sakamoto6, Ken Kato7, Chikako Shimizu1,2, Takahiro Ochiya3, Kenji Tamura1.
Abstract
The identification of biomarkers for predicting the responsiveness to eribulin in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated with an anthracycline and a taxane remains an unmet need. Here, we established a serum microRNA (miRNA)-based prediction model for the emergence of new distant metastases after eribulin treatment. Serum samples were collected from metastatic breast cancer patients prior to eribulin treatment and comprehensively evaluated by miRNA microarray. The prediction model for estimating eribulin efficacy was established using the logistic LASSO regression model. Serum samples were collected from 147 patients, of which 52 developed at least one new distant metastasis after eribulin monotherapy and 95 did not develop new distant metastases. A combination of eight serum miRNAs (miR-4483, miR-8089, miR-4755-3p, miR-296-3p, miR-575, miR-4710, miR-5698 and miR-3160-5p) predicted the appearance of new distant metastases with an area under the curve of 0.79, sensitivity of 0.69 and specificity of 0.82. The serum levels of miR-8089 and miR-5698 were significantly associated with overall survival after the initiation of eribulin treatment. The present study provides evidence that serum miRNA profiling may serve as a biomarker for the responsiveness to eribulin and for predicting the development of new distant metastases in metastatic breast cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31483849 PMCID: PMC6726239 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patient characteristics.
| New distant metastasis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Positive | (n = 52) | Negative | (n = 95) | P-value | |
| Age—median [range] | 54 | [32–76] | 59 | [33–78] | 0.066 | |
| Follow-up period—median [range] (month) | 8.6 | [0.2–59.0] | 12.5 | [0.9–56.0] | ||
| ER—no. (%) | 0.442 | |||||
| + | 35 | (67.3) | 70 | (74.5) | ||
| - | 17 | (32.7) | 24 | (25.5) | ||
| PgR—no. (%) | 0.482 | |||||
| + | 30 | (57.7) | 60 | (63.8) | ||
| - | 22 | (42.3) | 34 | (36.6) | ||
| HER2—no. (%) | 0.810 | |||||
| + | 8 | (15.4) | 13 | (14.0) | ||
| - | 44 | (84.6) | 80 | (86.0) | ||
| TNBC—no. (%) | 0.500 | |||||
| + | 11 | (21.2) | 15 | (16.0) | ||
| - | 41 | (78.8) | 79 | (84.0) | ||
| Stage—no. (%) | 0.267 | |||||
| Recurrence | 44 | (84.6) | 87 | (91.6) | ||
| Stage IV | 8 | (15.4) | 8 | (8.4) | ||
| ECOG PS–no. (%) | 0.548 | |||||
| 0 | 27 | (51.9) | 57 | (60.0) | ||
| 1 | 22 | (42.3) | 35 | (36.8) | ||
| 2 | 3 | (5.8) | 3 | (3.2) | ||
| No. of metastatic sites—no. (%) | 0.861 | |||||
| ≥3 | 22 | (42.3) | 38 | (40.0) | ||
| <3 | 30 | (57.7) | 57 | (60.0) | ||
| Visceral disease—no. (%) | 0.599 | |||||
| + | 45 | (86.5) | 85 | (89.5) | ||
| - | 7 | (13.5) | 10 | (10.5) | ||
| Treatment line of eribulin—no. (%) | 0.746 | |||||
| 1 | 5 | (9.6) | 5 | (5.3) | ||
| 2 | 12 | (23.1) | 19 | (20.0) | ||
| 3 | 17 | (32.7) | 29 | (30.5) | ||
| 4 | 10 | (19.2) | 22 | (23.2) | ||
| ≥5 | 8 | (15.4) | 20 | (21.0) | ||
| Objective response to eribulin—no. (%) | 0.369 | |||||
| PR | 3 | (5.8) | 8 | (8.4) | ||
| SD | 26 | (50.0) | 54 | (56.8) | ||
| PD | 22 | (42.3) | 28 | (29.5) | ||
| nonCR/nonPD | 1 | (1.9) | 5 | (5.3) | ||
a. Welch’s t-test
b. Fisher’s exact test
c. Pearson’s χ2 test
Fig 1Establishment of prognostic biomarkers of responsiveness to eribulin in metastatic breast cancer patients.
A. Coefficient path for the L1-regularised logistic regression applied to the cancer data plotted versus the logarithm of lambda (regularisation coefficient of L1 norm of the coefficient vector), relative to the norm of the estimate coefficients. The number of non-zero coefficients is shown above each plot. B. Cross-validation binomial deviance curve for logistic LASSO on the cancer data, with one-standard-error bands computed from 10-fold realisations. The vertical line on the left corresponds to the minimising value for logarithm Lambda. C. ROC curve analysis of the eight-miRNA combination predicting responsiveness to eribulin. AUC and p-values are shown in the plots. D. Kaplan-Meier plot of the rate of development of new distant metastases based on the prediction index. Black line: prediction index <0; Red line: prediction index ≥0.
Construction of prediction models using miRNAs.
| Number of miRNAs | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.92 | 0.27 | 0.50 | 0.62 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.72 |
| 3 | 0.77 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.74 |
| 5 | 0.83 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.76 |
| 6 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.77 |
| 7 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| 8 | 0.69 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.79 |
a. (-0.0239)*miR-575–0.4624.
b. (-0.04785)*miR-575+(-0.01639)*miR-3160-5p -0.18945.
c. (-0.004077)*miR-296-3p+(-0.09225)*miR-575+(-0.050573)*miR-3160-5p +0.377653.
d. (-0.004538)*miR-8089+(-0.090765)*miR-296-3p+(-0.184948)*miR-575+(-0.00378)*miR-4710+(-0.106025)*miR-3160-5p +2.096777.
e. (-0.056646)*miR-8089+(-0.002592)*miR-4755-3p+(-0.115385)*miR-296-3p+(-0.220128)*miR-575+(-0.015284)*miR-4710+(-0.11774)*miR-3160-5p +3.061642.
f. (-0.002883)*miR-4483+(-0.079497)*miR-8089+(-0.005242)*miR-4755-3p+(-0.12544)*miR-296-3p+(-0.237057)*miR-575+(-0.020395)*miR-4710+(-0.122488)*miR-3160-5p +3.51243.
g. (-0.01801)*miR-4483+(-0.14291)*miR-8089+(-0.01134)*miR-4755-3p+(-0.14277)*miR-296-3p+(-0.28373)*miR-575+(-0.03178)*miR-4710+(-0.01287)*miR-5698+(-0.13961)*miR-3160-5p +4.80275.
Fig 2Eight selected miRNAs for the prediction of eribulin responsiveness in metastatic breast cancer.
A. ROC curve analysis of the eight individual miRNAs. AUC and p-values are shown in the plots. B. PCA map of 53 new metastasis-positive samples (red) and 96 new metastasis-negative samples (blue) in metastatic breast cancer patients. C. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis with a heatmap showing 149 metastatic breast cancer samples prior to eribulin treatment with eight selected miRNAs.
Cox regression analysis of overall survival.
| Univariable | Multivariable | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | (95% CI) | P-value | HR | (95% CI) | P-value | |
| miR-4483 (per 2 times) | 1.02 | (0.84–1.23) | 0.840 | |||
| miR-8089 (per 2 times) | 0.52 | (0.33–0.8) | 0.61 | (0.37–0.98) | ||
| miR-4755-3p (per 2 times) | 1.01 | (0.88–1.15) | 0.848 | |||
| miR-296-3p (per 2 times) | 1.00 | (0.74–1.34) | 0.993 | |||
| miR-575 (per 2 times) | 0.88 | (0.72–1.06) | 0.185 | |||
| miR-4710 (per 2 times) | 0.89 | (0.75–1.06) | 0.203 | |||
| miR-5698 (per 2 times) | 0.74 | (0.61–0.9) | 0.76 | (0.62–0.92) | ||
| miR-3160-5p (per 2 times) | 0.97 | (0.82–1.13) | 0.712 | |||
| Age (per 10 yr) | 0.70 | (0.56–0.87) | 0.71 | (0.56–0.88) | ||
| ER positive | 0.93 | (0.57–1.5) | 0.760 | |||
| PgR positive | 0.78 | (0.5–1.19) | 0.254 | |||
| HER2 positive | 0.65 | (0.32–1.29) | 0.218 | |||
| TNBC positive | 1.71 | (0.98–2.95) | 0.057 | 1.60 | (0.88–2.9) | 0.119 |
| Stage IV | 0.93 | (0.44–1.93) | 0.847 | |||
| ECOG PS ≥1 | 1.76 | (1.14–2.68) | 1.91 | (1.22–2.98) | ||
| No. of metastatic sites ≥3 | 1.62 | (1.04–2.48) | 1.62 | (1.01–2.58) | ||
| Presence of visceral disease | 1.00 | (0.54–1.83) | 0.988 |
a. adjusted for marginally associated factors (p < 0.1) in univariable analyses.
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.