| Literature DB >> 31483781 |
Rachel M Scott1, Hallie R Buckley1, Kate Domett2, Monica Tromp1,3, Hiep Hoang Trinh4, Anna Willis5, Hirofumi Matsumura6, Marc F Oxenham7.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to test the hypothesis that healed traumatic injuries in the pre-Neolithic assemblage of Con Co Ngua, northern Vietnam (c. 6800-6200 cal BP) are consistent with large wild animal interactions prior to their domestication. The core sample included 110 adult (aged ≥ 18 years) individuals, while comparisons are made with an additional six skeletal series from Neolithic through to Iron Age Vietnam, Thailand, and Mongolia. All post cranial skeletal elements were assessed for signs of healed trauma and identified cases were further x-rayed. Crude trauma prevalence (14/110, 12.7%) was not significantly different between males (8/52) and females (5/37) (χ2 = 0.061, p = 0.805). Nor were there significant differences in the prevalence of fractured limbs, although males displayed greater rates of lower limb bone trauma than females. Further, distinct from females, half the injured males suffered vertebral fractures, consistent with high-energy trauma. The first hypothesis is supported, while some support for the sexual divisions of labour was found. The prevalence and pattern of fractured limbs at CCN when compared with other Southeast and East Asian sites is most similar to the agropastoral site of Lamadong, China. The potential for skeletal trauma to assess animal trapping and herding practices prior to domestication in the past is discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31483781 PMCID: PMC6726200 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218777
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Box insert is the region of the Da But period site of Con Co Ngua, northern Vietnam.
(Map sourced from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/attachments/maps/VM-ma).
Age and sex distribution of Con Co Ngua adults.
| Male | Female | Unsexed | Total | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | 19 | 13 | 7 | 39 | 35.5 |
| Mid | 17 | 11 | 4 | 32 | 29.1 |
| Old | 15 | 10 | 1 | 26 | 23.6 |
| Adult | 1 | 3 | 9 | 13 | 11.8 |
| Total | 52 | 37 | 21 | 110 | |
| % | 47.3 | 33.6 | 19.1 |
Summary of antemortem (healed) fractures in individuals from Con Co Ngua (2013 excavation).
| Burial | Adult age | Sex | Element | Description of injuries |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M2a | Mid | Male | Clavicle | R clavicle: mid shaft fracture. The acromial end is bowed superiorly and there is a deep lytic defect on the inferior aspect |
| Radius | R radius: colles’ fracture of the distal metaphysis. R ulna not injured | |||
| Ribs | Ribs (3) un-sided: shaft fractures | |||
| M9a | Mid | Female | Clavicle | L clavicle: well remodeled fracture just medial to the muscle attachment of the deltoid on the acromial extremity. Orientation is ant/posterior. No displacement |
| M44a | Young | Male | Lumbar vertebrae | L1: compression fracture. Anterior height 18.7mm, posterior height 25.5mm |
| L2: fractures of the right pedicle and left lamina | ||||
| M48a | Young | Female | Radius | R radius: comminuted fracture of the distal diaphysis. Distal portion is displaced laterally and bowed anteriorally, 17° angulation. |
| Distal R ulna not present | ||||
| M69a | Mid | Female | Ulna | L ulna: oblique fracture of the distal diaphysis. Lateral displacement of distal portion, 18° angulation. L radius not present |
| M77a | Old | Male | Lumbar vertebrae | L1: left pedicle fractured and shortened with associated osteophyte formation. Left inferior facet is enlarged with osteophyte formation and eburnation |
| L2: corresponding superior facet is similarly affected as L1 | ||||
| M89a | Unknown | Unknown | Metacarpal | L mt5: Jones’ fracture of the proximal shaft |
| M114a | Mid | Male | Radius | L radius: possible Chauffer’s fracture of the styloid process. Slight anterior displacement. L ulna (distal third) not present |
| M117a | Young | Male | Radius | L radius: oblique fracture of the proximal diaphysis, 8–10° angulation. Left ulna not injured |
| Ulna | R ulna: transverse fracture of the mid shaft, 10° angulation. R radius not injured | |||
| Tibia | L tibia: comminuted fracture of the distal diaphysis. Slight lateral displacement, 3–8° angulation. Callus approximately 10cm long still remodelling. Cloaca on distal posterior shaft | |||
| Fibula | L fibula: oblique fracture of the distal diaphysis, 18–25° angulation. Possible supination external rotation fracture (supinated foot) | |||
| M124a | Old | Male | Phalanx | R hand phalanx: fracture third digit distal and intermediate phalanges fused |
| M126 | Mid | Male | Femur | L femur: transverse fracture of the mid shaft. The callus does not encompass the anterior portion of the fracture and is well remodelled, 8–16° angulation |
| Pelvis | L pubic ramus: fracture on the ventro superior aspect just adjacent to the acetabulum. The rami of the pubis are significantly shorter than the right side | |||
| Lumbar vertebra | L2: compression fracture | |||
| M127a | Mid | Male | Clavicle | R clavicle: fracture of the acromial end with slight displacement medially and slight inferior rotation |
| Cervical vertebrae | C3 or C4: compression flexion or vertical compression fracture | |||
| M133a | Mid | Female | Metatarsals | L mt4 and mt5: non union/amputation |
| M140 | Old | Female | Radius | R radius: oblique fracture of the distal diaphysis, 13–15° angulation. Slight posterior displacement. R ulna not injured |
| Ulna | L ulna: fracture of the distal diaphysis. Distal shaft pushed upwards and medially causing overlap and displacement, 3–8° angulation. Partial left radius present and not injured |
The prevalence of limb bone fractures (including clavicles) at Con Co Ngua by side and sex.
| Element | Males | Females | Significance | Indeterminate | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/N (L + R = total) | % | n/N (L + R = total) | % | n/N (L + R = total) | % | n/N (L + R = total) | % | ||
| Clavicle | 0/17 + 2/20 = 2/37 | 5.4 | 1/7 + 0/16 = 1/23 | 4.3 | p = 0.675 | 0/5 + 0/4 = 0/9 | 0 | 1/29 + 2/40 = 3/69 | 4.3 |
| Humerus | 0/22 + 0/33 = 0/55 | 0 | 0/18 + 0/20 = 0/38 | 0 | N/A | 0/7 + 0/2 = 0/9 | 0 | 0/47 + 0/55 = 0/102 | 0 |
| Radius | 2/24 + 1/25 = 3/49 | 6.1 | 0/12 + 2/19 = 2/31 | 6.5 | p = 0.647 | 0/4 + 0/5 = 0/9 | 0 | 2/40 + 3/49 = 5/89 | 5.6 |
| Ulna | 0/31 + 1/26 = 1/57 | 1.8 | 2/22 + 0/19 = 2/41 | 4.9 | p = 0.377 | 0/6 + 0/6 = 0/12 | 0 | 2/59 + 1/51 = 3/110 | 2.7 |
| Femur | 1/25 + 0/26 = 1/51 | 2.0 | 0/17 + 0/15 = 0/32 | 0 | p = 0.614 | 0/6 + 0/6 = 0/12 | 0 | 1/48 + 0/47 = 1/95 | 1.1 |
| Tibia | 1/18 + 0/16 = 1/34 | 2.9 | 0/8 + 0/10 = 0/17 | 0 | p = 0.667 | 0/4 + 0/4 = 0/8 | 0 | 1/30 + 0/30 = 1/60 | 1.7 |
| Fibula | 1/18 + 0/19 = 1/37 | 2.7 | 0/10 + 0/9 = 0/19 | 0 | p = 0.661 | 0/4 + 0/2 = 0/6 | 0 | 1/32 + 0/30 = 1/62 | 1.6 |
| Total | 5/155 + 4/165 = 9/320 | 2.8 | 3/93 + 2/108 = 5/201 | 2.5 | χ2 0.050, p = .823 | 0/36 + 0/29 = 0/65 | 0 | 8/285 + 6/302 = 14/587 | 2.4 |
n is number of antemortem fractures; N is the observed number of elements >75% complete (left + right)
* Fisher Exact Test (FET), males compared with females
Fig 2Regions of the skeleton with antemortem trauma of males and females.
Areas not quantified by the number of observable elements are indicated by striped regions.
Fig 3Left tibia and fibula (distal half of diaphysis, anterior view), and corresponding radiograph (tibia only, anterior view) of a young adult male buried at Con Co Ngua (Burial M117a).
Note oblique fracture angle (in radiograph) and residual callus formation on tibial diaphysis].
Fig 4Compression fracture of the first lumbar vertebra (upper body in the photo).
Right postero-lateral view, young adult male (M44a).
Fig 5Left metatarsals four and five (dorsal aspect) of a mid-aged adult female buried at Con Co Ngua (Burial M133a).
The distal ends (originally mid-shafts) display equivalent levels of extensive remodelling (but lack bridging callus formations) consistent with non-union and/or amputation.
Prevalence of limb bone fractures by element (sides combined) in Southeast and East Asian archaeological assemblages.
| Assemblage | Clavicle | Humerus | Radius | Ulna | Femur | Tibia | Fibula | Total (excluding clavicles) | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con Co Ngua | n/a | 2/45 (4.4%) | 0/27 (0.0%) | 0/21 (0.0%) | 3/46 (6.5%) | 0/29 (0.0%) | 0/12 (0.0%) | 5/180 | 6700–6200 |
| Con Co Ngua 2013 | 3/69 (4.3%) | 0/102 (0.0%) | 5/89 (5.6%) | 3/110 (2.7%) | 1/95 (1.1%) | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1/62 (1.6%) | 11/518 | " |
| " | |||||||||
| Vietnam Metal period sites | n/a | 0/23h (0.0%) | 1/14r (7.1%) | 1/14u (7.1%) | 0/25f (0.0%) | 0/18t (0.0%) | 0/11fi (0.0%) | 2/105 | 3300–1700 |
| Khok Phanom Di | 2/106 (1.9%) | 0/104 (0.0%) | 0/102 (0.0%) | 0/74 (0.0%) | 0/85 (0.0%) | 0/90 (0.0%) | 0/48 (0.0%) | 0/503 | 3950–3450 |
| Ban Lum Khao | 1/39 (2.6%) | 0/37 (0.0%) | 3/48 (6.3%) | 4/40 (10.0%) | 0/37 (0.0%) | 0/34 (0.0%) | 1/29 (3.4%) | 8/225 | 3350–2450 |
| Non Ban Jak | 1/69 | 0/77 | 4/57 | 1/60 | 0/65 | 0/66 | 0/62 | 6/387 | 1650–1200 |
| Jinggouzi | n/a | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/33 (0.0%) | 3/32 (9.3%) | 2/48 (4.2%) | 2/43 | 0/37 (0.0%) | 8/225 | 2950–2550 |
| Lamadong | n/a | 2/231 (0.9%) | 6/151 (4.0%) | 1/158 (0.6%) | 2/316 (0.6%) | 6/307 (2.0%) | 5/161 (3.1%) | 22/1324 | 1730–1511 |
1[6]
2[4]
3[7]
4[55]
Comparison of upper and lower limbs fractures for Southeast and East Asian archaeological assemblages.
| Assemblage | Upper limbs | Lower limbs | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Con Co Ngua Total | 10/94 (2.5%) | 6/304 (2.0%) | χ2 = 0.244, p = 0.621 |
| Vietnam Metal period sites | 2/52 (3.9%) | 0/54 (0.0%) | N/A |
| Khok Phanom Di | 0/280 (0.0%) | 0/223 (0.0%) | N/A |
| Ban Lum Khao | 7/122 (5.7%) | 1/100 (1.0%) | FET = 0.059 |
| Non Ban Jak | 5/194 (2.6%) | 1/193 (0.5%) | FET = 0.109 |
| Jinggouzi | 1/97 (1.0%) | 4/128 (3.1%) | FET = 0.283 |
| Lamadong | 13/784 (1.7%) | 22/1324 (1.7%) | χ2 = 0.000, p = 0.991 |
Data and sources derived from Table 4
Fig 6An example of hyperflexion of the neck following being tossed into the air.
Image credit Rebecca Benham.