Thomas Nordahl Christensen1, Iben Gammelgård Wallstrøm2, Elsebeth Stenager3, Anders Bo Bojesen4, Christian Gluud5, Merete Nordentoft1, Lene Falgaard Eplov4. 1. Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Research Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 3. Research Unit Psychiatry, Department of Regional Health Services, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 4. Research Unit, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
Importance: Individual placement and support (IPS) seems to be an effective vocational intervention for people with severe mental illness, but its effects have not yet been shown in the Danish welfare model. Also, effects may be enhanced by adding cognitive remediation and work-focused social skills training (IPS with enhancements [IPSE]). Objectives: To investigate the effects of IPS vs IPSE vs service as usual (SAU) on a population of individuals with severe mental illness in Denmark. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an investigator-initiated, 3-group, parallel, assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial that used early-intervention teams or community mental health services in 3 Danish cities to recruit participants with severe mental illness. Participants were randomly assigned to receive IPS, IPSE, or SAU from November 2012 to February 2016, and follow-up continued until August 2017. Interventions: Participants allocated to the IPS intervention received vocational support per the principles of the IPS model. Participants in the IPSE arm received cognitive remediation and social skills training in addition to IPS. The group receiving SAU received vocational rehabilitation at the Danish job centers. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of hours in competitive employment or education during the 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included intergroup differences in employment or education at any point during follow-up; time to employment or education; and cognitive and social functioning, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Results: Of the 720 included participants (mean [SD] age, 32.8 [9.9] years; 276 [38.3%] women), 243 received IPS, 238 received IPSE, and 239 received SAU. Most participants (551 [76.5%]) were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. During the 18-month follow-up, the IPSE group worked or studied a mean (SD) of 488.1 (735.6) hours, compared with 340.8 (573.8) hours in the group receiving SAU (success-rate difference [SRD], 0.151 [95% CI, 0.01-0.295]; P = .016). The mean (SD) in the IPS group was 411 (656.9) (SRD, 0.127 [95% CI, -0.017 to 0.276]; P = .004). There was no difference between IPS and IPSE in any vocational outcomes, and the 3 groups showed no differences in any nonvocational outcomes, except that the IPS and IPSE groups were more satisfied with the services received than the group receiving SAU (IPS vs SAU: SRD, 0.310 [95% CI, 0.167-0.445]); IPSE vs SAU: SRD, 0.341 [95% CI, 0.187-0.478]). Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with SAU, IPS and IPSE seem to be viable routes to increase employment and education rates in people with severe mental illness in Denmark, but no additional effects were observed by enhancing IPS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01722344.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Individual placement and support (IPS) seems to be an effective vocational intervention for people with severe mental illness, but its effects have not yet been shown in the Danish welfare model. Also, effects may be enhanced by adding cognitive remediation and work-focused social skills training (IPS with enhancements [IPSE]). Objectives: To investigate the effects of IPS vs IPSE vs service as usual (SAU) on a population of individuals with severe mental illness in Denmark. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an investigator-initiated, 3-group, parallel, assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial that used early-intervention teams or community mental health services in 3 Danish cities to recruit participants with severe mental illness. Participants were randomly assigned to receive IPS, IPSE, or SAU from November 2012 to February 2016, and follow-up continued until August 2017. Interventions: Participants allocated to the IPS intervention received vocational support per the principles of the IPS model. Participants in the IPSE arm received cognitive remediation and social skills training in addition to IPS. The group receiving SAU received vocational rehabilitation at the Danish job centers. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of hours in competitive employment or education during the 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included intergroup differences in employment or education at any point during follow-up; time to employment or education; and cognitive and social functioning, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Results: Of the 720 included participants (mean [SD] age, 32.8 [9.9] years; 276 [38.3%] women), 243 received IPS, 238 received IPSE, and 239 received SAU. Most participants (551 [76.5%]) were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. During the 18-month follow-up, the IPSE group worked or studied a mean (SD) of 488.1 (735.6) hours, compared with 340.8 (573.8) hours in the group receiving SAU (success-rate difference [SRD], 0.151 [95% CI, 0.01-0.295]; P = .016). The mean (SD) in the IPS group was 411 (656.9) (SRD, 0.127 [95% CI, -0.017 to 0.276]; P = .004). There was no difference between IPS and IPSE in any vocational outcomes, and the 3 groups showed no differences in any nonvocational outcomes, except that the IPS and IPSE groups were more satisfied with the services received than the group receiving SAU (IPS vs SAU: SRD, 0.310 [95% CI, 0.167-0.445]); IPSE vs SAU: SRD, 0.341 [95% CI, 0.187-0.478]). Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with SAU, IPS and IPSE seem to be viable routes to increase employment and education rates in people with severe mental illness in Denmark, but no additional effects were observed by enhancing IPS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01722344.
Authors: Lone Hellström; Pernille Pedersen; Thomas Nordahl Christensen; Iben Gammelgaard Wallstroem; Anders Bo Bojesen; Elsebeth Stenager; Ulrika Bejerholm; Jooske van Busschbach; Harry Michon; Kim T Mueser; Silje Endresen Reme; Sarah White; Lene Falgaard Eplov Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2021-03-04
Authors: Helen Killaspy; Carol Harvey; Catherine Brasier; Lisa Brophy; Priscilla Ennals; Justine Fletcher; Bridget Hamilton Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Gary R Bond; Monirah Al-Abdulmunem; Jessica Marbacher; Thomas N Christensen; Vigdis Sveinsdottir; Robert E Drake Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2022-10-11
Authors: Lars de Winter; Chrisje Couwenbergh; Jaap van Weeghel; Sarita Sanches; Harry Michon; Gary R Bond Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 7.818
Authors: Gabriele Nibbio; Stefano Barlati; Paolo Cacciani; Paola Corsini; Alessandra Mosca; Anna Ceraso; Giacomo Deste; Antonio Vita Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lana K M Otto; Jacomijn Hofstra; Michelle G Mullen; Derek Malenczak; Nynke Boonstra; Lisette van der Meer; Wim Veling; Cees Boerhout; Gerard D van Rijsbergen; Jos de Vries; Boudien van der Pol; Gerdina H M Pijnenborg; Lies Korevaar Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2020-04-27