N R DeTore1, O Balogun-Mwangi2, K T Mueser3, S R McGurk4. 1. Massachusetts General Hospital, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, United States of America. 2. Salve Regina University, United States of America. 3. Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, United States of America; Department of Occupational Therapy, Boston University, United States of America. Electronic address: mueser@bu.edu. 4. Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, United States of America; Department of Occupational Therapy, Boston University, United States of America.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite evidence that cognitive remediation improves cognitive and employment outcomes in persons with severe mental illnesses (SMI), its effects have not been systematically compared between Black and White participants. Considering that Black adults have more negative experiences receiving mental health treatment, providers may have greater difficulty engaging and retaining Black Americans in cognitive remediation. Due to the effects of structural racism on reducing employment opportunities for Black Americans, it is unclear whether Black participants will reap the same benefits of cognitive remediation on work outcomes as White Americans. This paper addressed this question. METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted of five randomized controlled trials comparing cognitive remediation (the Thinking Skills for Work program: TSW) and vocational rehabilitation vs. vocational rehabilitation only in 137 Black and 147 White Americans (64.2% schizophrenia-schizoaffective disorder) who were followed up for two years. RESULTS: Comparable proportions of Black and White participants were engaged and retained in TSW (>75%). Participants who received TSW improved significantly more in cognition than those receiving vocational services alone, with no racial differences in benefit. Participants in TSW obtained more work, earned more wages, and worked more weeks than those receiving vocational services alone, with no differences between the races. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that Black Americans with SMI receiving vocational services could be successfully engaged in and benefit from cognitive remediation, highlighting the vital role of healthcare service systems in giving credence to structural racism to more effectively mitigate racial disparities in treatment outcomes.
PURPOSE: Despite evidence that cognitive remediation improves cognitive and employment outcomes in persons with severe mental illnesses (SMI), its effects have not been systematically compared between Black and White participants. Considering that Black adults have more negative experiences receiving mental health treatment, providers may have greater difficulty engaging and retaining Black Americans in cognitive remediation. Due to the effects of structural racism on reducing employment opportunities for Black Americans, it is unclear whether Black participants will reap the same benefits of cognitive remediation on work outcomes as White Americans. This paper addressed this question. METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted of five randomized controlled trials comparing cognitive remediation (the Thinking Skills for Work program: TSW) and vocational rehabilitation vs. vocational rehabilitation only in 137 Black and 147 White Americans (64.2% schizophrenia-schizoaffective disorder) who were followed up for two years. RESULTS: Comparable proportions of Black and White participants were engaged and retained in TSW (>75%). Participants who received TSW improved significantly more in cognition than those receiving vocational services alone, with no racial differences in benefit. Participants in TSW obtained more work, earned more wages, and worked more weeks than those receiving vocational services alone, with no differences between the races. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that Black Americans with SMI receiving vocational services could be successfully engaged in and benefit from cognitive remediation, highlighting the vital role of healthcare service systems in giving credence to structural racism to more effectively mitigate racial disparities in treatment outcomes.
Authors: Hector W H Tsang; Ada Y Leung; Raymond C K Chung; Morris Bell; Wai-Ming Cheung Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: Daniëlle van Duin; Lars de Winter; Matthijs Oud; Hans Kroon; Wim Veling; Jaap van Weeghel Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Carmen Black Parker; William V McCall; E Vanessa Spearman-McCarthy; Peter Rosenquist; Niayesh Cortese Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Richard S E Keefe; Terry E Goldberg; Philip D Harvey; James M Gold; Margaret P Poe; Leigh Coughenour Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Kim T Mueser; David L Penn; Arundati Nagendra; David M Weiss; Carrington Merritt; Corinne Cather; Effua E Sosoo Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2022-08-06 Impact factor: 4.519