Literature DB >> 31483160

Reviewing U.S. Connected Diabetes Care: The Newest Member of the Team.

Brian J Levine1, Kelly L Close1, Robert A Gabbay2.   

Abstract

Recent years have brought about an explosion in the number of companies offering connected diabetes care products, defined as digital diabetes management systems based around (1) smartphone apps, (2) devices with built-in connectivity, and (3) remote human and automated coaching and support. These nascent models aim to provide more continuous and on-demand care, aligning with the 24/7 demands of chronic disease. It has been enabled by multiple factors, including the rising use of connected devices and apps to help people manage their chronic conditions, growing appreciation for the importance of outcomes beyond A1c, and the lofty and growing cost of health care. Despite the potential of these programs to improve the outcomes and well-being of people with diabetes and reduce the burdens on health care providers and systems, awareness and use of these programs and approaches remain low in the medical community. In this article, we present a snapshot of this dynamic field, including a taxonomy of various connected diabetes care products available to employers, health plans, health systems, and people with diabetes in the United States, and we identify meaningful distinctions among them: (1) health conditions managed, (2) peer support interactions, (3) prescribing providers on the care team, (4) provision of connected medical devices and/or continuous glucose monitors, (5) degree of treatment personalization, and (6) clinical and real-world evidence. We also discuss broad trends in connected diabetes care. Given the urgency and scale of the diabetes epidemic, it is vital that a range of medical and clinical communities find meaningful ways to scale individualized, timely care under reimbursement models that better align incentives for various stakeholders, particularly health care providers themselves. This would not only address deficiencies in care but could also make diabetes care more attractive to future clinicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coach; Connected; Continuous; Digital; Remote; Telemedicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31483160     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  15 in total

1.  Impact of Participation in a Virtual Diabetes Clinic on Diabetes-Related Distress in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Jennifer E Layne; Christopher G Parkin; Coco M Kusiak; Nathan A Barleen; David P Miller; Howard Zisser; Ronald F Dixon
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-10

2.  Analysis of "Accuracy of a 14-Day Factory Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitoring System With Advanced Algorithm in Pediatric and Adult Population With Diabetes".

Authors:  Tejaswi Kompala; Aaron B Neinstein
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-21

Review 3.  A New Taxonomy for Technology-Enabled Diabetes Self-Management Interventions: Results of an Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Deborah A Greenwood; Michelle L Litchman; Diana Isaacs; Julia E Blanchette; Jane K Dickinson; Allyson Hughes; Vanessa D Colicchio; Jiancheng Ye; Kirsten Yehl; Andrew Todd; Malinda M Peeples
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-08-11

4.  Discovering Engagement Personas in a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program.

Authors:  Jonathan H Hori; Elizabeth X Sia; Kimberly G Lockwood; Lisa A Auster-Gussman; Sharon Rapoport; OraLee H Branch; Sarah A Graham
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24

5.  Digital Diabetes Care System Observations from a Pilot Evaluation Study in Vietnam.

Authors:  Tran Quang Khanh; Pham Nhu Hao; Eytan Roitman; Itamar Raz; Baruch Marganitt; Avivit Cahn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Diabetes clinic reinvented: will technology change the future of diabetes care?

Authors:  Marwa Al-Badri; Osama Hamdy
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.565

7.  Use of Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring Is Associated With A1C Reduction in People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin or Noninsulin Therapy.

Authors:  Eugene E Wright; Matthew S D Kerr; Ignacio J Reyes; Yelena Nabutovsky; Eden Miller
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2021-02-10

8.  Improved Glycemic Control With a Digital Health Intervention in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Gretchen Zimmermann; Aarathi Venkatesan; Kelly Rawlings; Michael D Scahill
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2021-06-02

9.  A care team-based classification and population management schema for connected diabetes care.

Authors:  Brian J Levine; Kelly L Close; Robert A Gabbay
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-08-07

10.  Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Participating in a Continuous Glucose Monitor-Driven Virtual Diabetes Clinic: Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Amit R Majithia; Coco M Kusiak; Amy Armento Lee; Francis R Colangelo; Robert J Romanelli; Scott Robertson; David P Miller; David M Erani; Jennifer E Layne; Ronald F Dixon; Howard Zisser
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.