Literature DB >> 33132505

Impact of Participation in a Virtual Diabetes Clinic on Diabetes-Related Distress in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.

William H Polonsky1,2, Jennifer E Layne3, Christopher G Parkin4, Coco M Kusiak5, Nathan A Barleen3, David P Miller5, Howard Zisser5, Ronald F Dixon3.   

Abstract

The Onduo Virtual Diabetes Clinic is a telehealth program for people with type 2 diabetes that combines mobile app technology, remote personalized lifestyle coaching, connected blood glucose meters, real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) devices, and clinical support from board-certified endocrinologists. This analysis evaluated change in diabetes distress among 228 program participants who reported moderate distress (score 2.0-2.9) or high distress (score ≥3.0) on the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) at enrollment. Participants reported significant reductions in overall distress from 3.0 ± 0.8 at baseline to 2.5 ± 0.9 (P <0.001) at an average of 6 months of follow-up. Significant reductions in all DDS17 subscale scores were observed; most notable were reductions in the regimen-related and emotional distress subscales (-0.9 and -0.4, respectively; both P <0.001). Significantly greater reductions in overall distress (P = 0.012) and regimen-related distress (P <0.001) were reported by participants who were prescribed and used intermittent rtCGM (n = 77) versus nonusers (n = 151). Although the generalizability of these findings may be limited by the study's small sample size and potential for self-selection bias, these results do suggest that telemedicine programs such as the Onduo VDC could be a valuable tool for addressing the problem of diabetes-related distress.
© 2020 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33132505      PMCID: PMC7566922          DOI: 10.2337/cd19-0105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Diabetes        ISSN: 0891-8929


  26 in total

1.  Does diabetes-related distress explain the presence of depressive symptoms and/or poor self-care in individuals with Type 1 diabetes?

Authors:  C E Lloyd; G Pambianco; T J Orchard
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.359

2.  Assessment of diabetes acceptance can help identify patients with ineffective diabetes self-care and poor diabetes control.

Authors:  A Schmitt; A Reimer; B Kulzer; T Haak; A Gahr; N Hermanns
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher; Jay Earles; R James Dudl; Joel Lees; Joseph Mullan; Richard A Jackson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  A population-based approach to diabetes management in a primary care setting: early results and lessons learned.

Authors:  D K McCulloch; M J Price; M Hindmarsh; E H Wagner
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  1998 Aug-Sep

5.  The Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Markers of Quality of Life in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Further Findings From the DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Danielle Hessler; Katrina J Ruedy; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Lawrence Fisher; Russell E Glasgow; Lisa A Strycker
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Correlates of diabetes-related distress in type 2 diabetes: Findings from the benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study.

Authors:  Basilio Pintaudi; Giuseppe Lucisano; Sandro Gentile; Angela Bulotta; Soren E Skovlund; Giacomo Vespasiani; Maria C Rossi; Antonio Nicolucci
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program study.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher; Charles H Schikman; Deborah A Hinnen; Christopher G Parkin; Zhihong Jelsovsky; Bettina Petersen; Matthias Schweitzer; Robin S Wagner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

Authors:  Lawrence Fisher; Joseph T Mullan; Patricia Arean; Russell E Glasgow; Danielle Hessler; Umesh Masharani
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Use of a Novel, Remotely Connected Diabetes Management System Is Associated with Increased Treatment Satisfaction, Reduced Diabetes Distress, and Improved Glycemic Control in Individuals with Insulin-Treated Diabetes: First Results from the Personal Diabetes Management Study.

Authors:  Pablo Mora; Ann Buskirk; Maureen Lyden; Christopher G Parkin; Lena Borsa; Bettina Petersen
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 6.118

View more
  7 in total

1.  Addressing Diabetes Distress in Self-Management Programs: Results of a Randomized Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Ranjita Misra; Samantha Shawley-Brzoska; Raihan Khan; Brenna O Kirk; Sijin Wen; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  J Appalach Health       Date:  2021-07-25

2.  The Digital/Virtual Diabetes Clinic: The Future Is Now-Recommendations from an International Panel on Diabetes Digital Technologies Introduction.

Authors:  Moshe Phillip; Richard M Bergenstal; Kelly L Close; Thomas Danne; Satish K Garg; Lutz Heinemann; Irl B Hirsch; Boris P Kovatchev; Lori M Laffel; Viswanathan Mohan; Christopher G Parkin; Tadej Battelino
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Medication Optimization Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Participating in a Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Driven Virtual Care Program: Prospective Study.

Authors:  Amit R Majithia; David M Erani; Coco M Kusiak; Jennifer E Layne; Amy Armento Lee; Francis R Colangelo; Robert J Romanelli; Scott Robertson; Shayla M Brown; Ronald F Dixon; Howard Zisser
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 4.  Statins as antiepileptogenic drugs: Analyzing the evidence and identifying the most promising statin.

Authors:  Yousif Hufthy; Mahima Bharadwaj; Shubhi Gupta; Delwar Hussain; Prince Josiah Sajanthan Joseph; Alizah Khan; Jessica King; Pieter Lahorgue; Ovin Jayawardena; Danial Rostami-Hochaghan; Chloe Smith; Anthony Marson; Nasir Mirza
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.740

5.  Remote Application and Use of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring by Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in a Virtual Diabetes Clinic.

Authors:  Richard M Bergenstal; Jennifer E Layne; Howard Zisser; Robert A Gabbay; Nathan A Barleen; Amy Armento Lee; Amit R Majithia; Christopher G Parkin; Ronald F Dixon
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Use of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Improves Glycemic Control and Other Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated with Less Intensive Therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Grace; Jay Salyer
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 7.  What's Wrong with This Picture? A Critical Review of Current Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Coverage Criteria for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Galindo; Christopher G Parkin; Grazia Aleppo; Anders L Carlson; Davida F Kruger; Carol J Levy; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Janet B McGill
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.118

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.