During the nutritional follow-up of hospitalized individuals, the nutritionist has as
activities to perform the diagnosis, dietary prescription, supervise the distribution of
the diets and evaluate their acceptance, and also perform nutritional counseling so that
these individuals understand how a standard specific diet may be more appropriate taking
into account their diagnoses and nutritional status. The number of nutritionists issued
by Resolution 600 of 2018 of the Federal Council of Nutritionists is 1 professional
every 15 beds of high complexity and every 30 beds of medium complexity.[1]Lima et al.[2] evaluated in an article
published in this edition whether nutritional counseling was performed in the hospital
environment for patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) and the quality of this
orientation. The authors found that 57.6% of the individuals hospitalized in the public
network and 70.3% private hospitals, both in Sergipe, Brazil, had received in-hospital
nutritional counseling.One possible cause of this low rate of counseling provided may be the amount of
nutritionists available in hospital institutions, which is lower than predicted by the
resolution.[1]Seta et al.,[3] 2010, evaluated 8 public
hospitals in 4 Brazilian states, of which none of the nutritionists evaluated reported
nutritional counseling.[3]Another problem is the quality of the guidance provided. It should be checked whether it
meets the guidelines for preventing the occurrence of new cardiovascular events.In the cited article there was a predominance of restrictive guidelines, especially salt
and fat. About the insertion of cardioprotective foods, patients from the private
network were more benefited, mainly regarding the consumption of fruits and
vegetables.The diet for prevention after acute myocardial infarction requires caloric adequacy,
applied calorie restriction when necessary for the adequacy of nutritional status. It is
important that the macronutrients are adequate within normality, taking into account the
restriction of saturated fats and balance between the other fats as recommended by the
dyslipidemia guideline.[4-6] In Addition, current guidelines on
prevention of cardiovascular events recommend a diet similar to the Mediterranean diet,
salt intake of < 5 g per day; 30-45 g fibre per day; regular consumption of fruits
and vegetables per daily; regular consumption of fish and unsalted nuts daily; limited
alcohol intake; and discouraging sugar-sweetened drinks.[7,8]The better understanding of the food behavior is indispensable to deepen the knowledge of
the determinants of the alimentary behavior, which include a complex range of
nutritional, demographic, social, cultural, environmental and psychological factors.
Several studies point out that the transthoracic model,[9] developed by two US researchers, James O. Prochaska and
Carlo DiClemente,[10] in the 1980s, can
be considered a promising instrument to help understanding health-related behavioral
change, and is widely used in research and clinical practice. The transthoracic model of
behavior change presents 5 stages. In the pre-contemplation stage, it has not yet been
considered by the individual or no changes were made to the behavior and there is no
intention to adopt them in the near future. In the stage of contemplation, the
individual begins to consider behavioral change. That is, it is intended to change the
behavior in the future, but a deadline has not yet been set, therefore.The decision-making individual, also called the preparation, intends to change his
behavior in the near future, as in the next month. Generally, after overcoming previous
attempts frustrated, small changes are made and a plan of action is adopted, still not
making a serious commitment to the same. Already the individuals in action correspond to
those who have in fact altered their behavior, their experiences or their environment so
as to overcome barriers previously perceived. Such changes are visible and have occurred
recently, as in the last six months. In the maintenance stage, the individual already
changed his behavior and kept him more than six months.[10]The study by Vieira et al.,[11] carried
out with individuals after angioplasty at a hospital specialized in cardiology, in
São Paulo, identified the stages of behavior change in which they were. 36% were
in maintenance, 26% in preparation, 17% in pre-contemplation, 12% in action and 9% in
contemplation. It is necessary for the nutrition team to create adequate food education
strategies for the individuals at each stage, in order to promote adherence to a more
favorable food plan and the adequacy of nutritional status.A study with individuals from the northern region of Paraná after AMI or
angioplasty aimed at identifying changes in attitudes and habits in these survivors. The
main changes identified were an increase in the number of meals, an increase in fruit
consumption, a reduction in the consumption of fats and fried foods, and the use of the
salt shaker on the table. The number of patients who did not perform physical activity
decreased.[12]It is very important to evaluate the achievemente and the quality of nutritional
counseling to allows the implementation of appropriate actions, since the moment after
the recent cardiovascular event may favor the adoption of favorable dietary changes for
these individuals.
Authors: André Arpad Faludi; Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar; José Francisco Kerr Saraiva; Ana Paula Marte Chacra; Henrique Tria Bianco; Abrahão Afiune; Adriana Bertolami; Alexandre C Pereira; Ana Maria Lottenberg; Andrei C Sposito; Antonio Carlos Palandri Chagas; Antonio Casella; Antônio Felipe Simão; Aristóteles Comte de Alencar; Bruno Caramelli; Carlos Costa Magalhães; Carlos Eduardo Negrão; Carlos Eduardo Dos Santos Ferreira; Carlos Scherr; Claudine Maria Alves Feio; Cristiane Kovacs; Daniel Branco de Araújo; Daniel Magnoni; Daniela Calderaro; Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Edgard Pessoa de Mello; Elizabeth Regina Giunco Alexandre; Emília Inoue Sato; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Fabiana Hanna Rached; Fábio César Dos Santos; Fernando Henpin Yue Cesena; Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca; Henrique Andrade Rodrigues da Fonseca; Hermes Toros Xavier; Isabela Cardoso Pimentel Mota; Isabela de Carlos Back Giuliano; Jaqueline Scholz Issa; Jayme Diament; João Bosco Pesquero; José Ernesto Dos Santos; José Rocha Faria; José Xavier de Melo; Juliana Tieko Kato; Kerginaldo Paulo Torres; Marcelo Chiara Bertolami; Marcelo Heitor Vieira Assad; Márcio Hiroshi Miname; Marileia Scartezini; Neusa Assumpta Forti; Otávio Rizzi Coelho; Raul Cavalcante Maranhão; Raul Dias Dos Santos; Renato Jorge Alves; Roberta Lara Cassani; Roberto Tadeu Barcellos Betti; Tales de Carvalho; Tânia Leme da Rocha Martinez; Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez; Wilson Salgado Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Borja Ibanez; Stefan James; Stefan Agewall; Manuel J Antunes; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Héctor Bueno; Alida L P Caforio; Filippo Crea; John A Goudevenos; Sigrun Halvorsen; Gerhard Hindricks; Adnan Kastrati; Mattie J Lenzen; Eva Prescott; Marco Roffi; Marco Valgimigli; Christoph Varenhorst; Pascal Vranckx; Petr Widimský Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-01-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Massimo F Piepoli; Arno W Hoes; Stefan Agewall; Christian Albus; Carlos Brotons; Alberico L Catapano; Marie-Therese Cooney; Ugo Corrà; Bernard Cosyns; Christi Deaton; Ian Graham; Michael Stephen Hall; F D Richard Hobbs; Maja-Lisa Løchen; Herbert Löllgen; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Joep Perk; Eva Prescott; Josep Redon; Dimitrios J Richter; Naveed Sattar; Yvo Smulders; Monica Tiberi; H Bart van der Worp; Ineke van Dis; W M Monique Verschuren; Simone Binno Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ticiane Clair Remacre Munareto Lima; Danielle Góes da Silva; Ikaro Daniel de Carvalho Barreto; Jussiely Cunha Oliveira; Laís Costa Souza Oliveira; Larissa Andreline Maia Arcelino; Jeferson Cunha Oliveira; Antônio Carlos Sobral Sousa; José Augusto Soares Barreto Filho Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 2.000