| Literature DB >> 31482336 |
Mengmeng Jin1,2, Anqi Xiao3, Liying Zhu4, Zhidong Zhang5, He Huang6, Ling Jiang7.
Abstract
Deinococcus is an extremophilic microorganism found in a wide range of habitats, including hot springs, radiation-contaminated areas, Antarctic soils, deserts, etc., and shows some of the highest levels of resistance to ionizing radiation known in nature. The highly efficient radiation-protection mechanisms of Deinococcus depend on a combination of passive and active defense mechanisms, including self-repair of DNA damage (homologous recombination, MMR, ER and ESDSA), efficient cellular damage clearance mechanisms (hydrolysis of damaged proteins, overexpression of repair proteins, etc.), and effective clearance of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Due to these mechanisms, Deinococcus cells are highly resistant to oxidation, radiation and desiccation, which makes them potential chassis cells for wide applications in many fields. This article summarizes the latest research on the radiation-resistance mechanisms of Deinococcus and prospects its biotechnological application potentials.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-oxidation; DNA repair; Deinococcus; Ionizing radiation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31482336 PMCID: PMC6722170 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-019-0862-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1Radiation-resistance mechanisms of Deinococcus
Fig. 2Microbial cells synthesize trehalose under stress. There are five pathways for trehalose synthesis, TPS/TPP, TreY/TreZ, TreS, TreP, and TreT pathway. Deinococcus contain the TreY/TreZ and TreS pathways (Jiang et al. 2013; Filipkowski et al. 2012; Panek et al. 2013; Xu et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2009)
Fig. 3Mechanisms for the microbial treatment of heavy metal ions
Treatment of heavy metal ions using various microorganisms
| Microorganism | Heavy metal | pH | Temperature (°C) | Time (h) | Initial concentration | Results | Referencess |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Pb(II) | 5.0 | 25 | 2.0 | 50 mg/L | Monolayer adsorption capacity: 181.82 mg/g | Li et al. ( |
|
| Cu(II) Pb(II) | 5.5 5.0 | 22 22 | 4.0 4.0 | 10–180 mg/L 10–180 mg/L | 29.9 mg/g 72.5 mg/g | Amirnia et al. ( |
|
| Pb(II) Cd(II) | 5.0 5.0 | 20 20 | 0.5 0.5 | 10 mg/L 10 mg/L | 38.4 mg/g 27.3 mg/g | Sari and Tuzen ( |
|
| Cd(II) | 6.0 | 20 | 4.0 | 1000 μmol/L | 444 ± 15 μmol/g | Machalová et al. ( |
|
| Cd(II) | 6.0 | 20 | 4.0 | 1000 μmol/L | 381 ± 1 μmol/g | Machalová et al. ( |
|
| Zn(II) | 5.0 | 28 | 48 | 0.5 mmol/L | Removal rate: 85% | Li et al. ( |
|
| Cu(II) | 5.0 | 30 | 2.0 | 100 mg/L | 12.43 mg/g | Wei and Ting ( |
|
| Cd(II) | 7.0 | N.A. | 0.5 | N.A. | 15.6 mg/g | Park and Chon ( |
Cu(II) Pb(II) Cr(VI) | 5.0 5.5 6.0 | N.A. | N.A. | 10 mg/L | 169.15 mg/g 216.09 mg/g 84.47 mg/g | Ye et al. ( | |
|
| Hg(II) | N.A. | 30 | 24 | 10 μM | Removal rate: 91% | Giovanella et al. ( |
|
| U(VI) | N.A. | 30 | 504 | 235.5 μM | Removal rate: 89% | Fredrickson et al. ( |
| U(VI) | 5.0 | 30 | 13 | 1 mM | Removal rate: 77.6 ± 2.6% | Xu et al. ( | |
|
| U(VI) | 5.0 | Room temperature | 3 | 1 mM | Removal rate: 90.0% | Misra et al. ( |
|
| U(VI) | 5.0 | 25 | 6 | 0.8 mM | Removal rate: 90.0% | Appukuttan et al. ( |
|
| 60Co | 5.8 | 37 | 1.5 | 8.5 nM | Removal rate: > 60.0% | Gogada et al. ( |
|
| U(VI) | 5.0 | N.A. | 6 408 | 1 mM 20 mM | 260 mg/g 5.7 g/g | Appukuttan et al. ( |
N.A. not available