Literature DB >> 31481940

Catabolism of Alkylphenols in Rhodococcus via a Meta-Cleavage Pathway Associated With Genomic Islands.

David J Levy-Booth1, Morgan M Fetherolf1, Gordon R Stewart1, Jie Liu1, Lindsay D Eltis1, William W Mohn1.   

Abstract

The bacterial catabolism of aromatic compounds has considerable promise to convert lignin depolymerization products to commercial chemicals. Alkylphenols are a key class of depolymerization products whose catabolism is not well-elucidated. We isolated Rhodococcus rhodochrous EP4 on 4-ethylphenol and applied genomic and transcriptomic approaches to elucidate alkylphenol catabolism in EP4 and Rhodococcus jostii RHA1. RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR revealed a pathway encoded by the aphABCDEFGHIQRS genes that degrades 4-ethylphenol via the meta-cleavage of 4-ethylcatechol. This process was initiated by a two-component alkylphenol hydroxylase, encoded by the aphAB genes, which were upregulated ~3,000-fold. Purified AphAB from EP4 had highest specific activity for 4-ethylphenol and 4-propylphenol (~2,000 U/mg) but did not detectably transform phenol. Nevertheless, a ΔaphA mutant in RHA1 grew on 4-ethylphenol by compensatory upregulation of phenol hydroxylase genes (pheA1-3). Deletion of aphC, encoding an extradiol dioxygenase, prevented growth on 4-alkylphenols but not phenol. Disruption of pcaL in the β-ketoadipate pathway prevented growth on phenol but not 4-alkylphenols. Thus, 4-alkylphenols are catabolized exclusively via meta-cleavage in rhodococci while phenol is subject to ortho-cleavage. A putative genomic island encoding aph genes was identified in EP4 and several other rhodococci. Overall, this study identifies a 4-alkylphenol pathway in rhodococci, demonstrates key enzymes involved, and presents evidence that the pathway is encoded in a genomic island. These advances are of particular importance for wide-ranging industrial applications of rhodococci, including upgrading of lignocellulose biomass.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rhodococcus; alkylphenol; aromatic; catabolism; genomic island; meta-cleavage; transcriptomics

Year:  2019        PMID: 31481940      PMCID: PMC6710988          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Lignin, a heterogeneous aromatic polymer, accounts for up to 40% dry weight of terrestrial plant biomass (Ragauskas et al., 2014). It is primarily composed of p-hydroxyphenyl (H), guaiacyl (G), and sinapyl (S) subunits, polymerized by ether and C–C bonds (Boerjan et al., 2003). Lignin's heterogeneity and recalcitrant bonds create substantial barriers to its efficient microbial and chemical degradation. Industrial lignin depolymerization is gaining traction as a means to produce fuels and chemicals historically derived from petroleum (Ragauskas et al., 2014; Beckham et al., 2016). Yet, heterogeneous depolymerization products can require extensive separation and purification (Linger et al., 2014; Ragauskas et al., 2014). Bacterial biocatalysts provide a means of transforming mixtures of aromatic compounds to single compounds due to the convergent nature of their catabolic pathways, whereby substrates are transformed to central metabolites via shared intermediates, such as catechols (Linger et al., 2014; Eltis and Singh, 2018). Harnessing this biological funneling to refine lignin to high-value chemicals (Linger et al., 2014; Beckham et al., 2016; Eltis and Singh, 2018) is limited in part by a lack of knowledge of the catabolism of lignin-derived monomers. Alkylphenols are a major class of aromatic compounds generated by a variety of lignin depolymerization technologies. For example, solvolysis of corn lignin produced 24 wt.% alkylated monolignins, 46% of which was 4-ethylphenol derived from H-subunits (Jiang et al., 2014). Alkylphenols were also major pyrolysis products of wheat straw black liquor lignin fractions (Guo et al., 2017). Existing depolymerization strategies can require multiple stages of pre-processing and depolymerization, high heat, or corrosive chemicals, and can produce dozens of alkylphenol and aromatic products (Ye et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2015; Asawaworarit et al., 2019). One promising depolymerization strategy that produces a narrow stream of alkylphenols is reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF) (Pepper and Lee, 1969). 4-Ethylphenol was a major RCF product of corn stover, comprising up to 16.4% of the resulting aromatic monomers (Anderson et al., 2016). Two bacterial pathways for the aerobic catabolism of 4-ethylphenol have been reported, initially involving either oxidation of the alkyl side chain or hydroxylation of the aromatic ring. In Pseudomonas putida JD1, the alkyl side chain is oxidized by 4-ethylphenol methylhydroxylase to eventually yield hydroquinone (Darby et al., 1987; Hopper and Cottrell, 2003). In contrast, Pseudomonas sp. KL28 hydroxylates 4-ethylphenol to 4-ethylcatechol (Jeong et al., 2003). In these pathways, the hydroquinone and 4-ethylcatechol undergo meta-cleavage (Darby et al., 1987; Jeong et al., 2003). In KL28, the alkylphenol hydroxylase is a six-component enzyme encoded by genes organized in a single co-linear transcriptional unit within a meta-cleavage pathway gene cluster (Jeong et al., 2003). A homologous pathway degrades phenol in Comamonas testosteroni TA441 (Arai et al., 2000). Rhodococcus is a genus of mycolic acid-producing Actinobacteria that catabolize a wide variety of aromatic compounds (Yam et al., 2010), including phenols (Kolomytseva et al., 2007; Gröning et al., 2014). These bacteria also have considerable potential as biocatalysts for the industrial production of compounds ranging from nitriles to steroids and high-value lipids (Alvarez et al., 1996; Round et al., 2017; Shields-Menard et al., 2017; Sengupta et al., 2019). In Rhodococcus, phenol catabolism is initiated by a two-component flavin-dependent monooxygenase (PheA1A2; Saa et al., 2010) to generate a catechol. PheA1A2 homologs in Rhodococcus opacus 1CP can also hydroxylate chlorophenols and 4-methylphenol (Gröning et al., 2014) to produce the corresponding catechols, which undergo ortho-cleavage (Maltseva et al., 1994; Kolomytseva et al., 2007) and subsequent transformation to central metabolites via the β-ketoadipate pathway. In rhodococci, the β-ketoadipate pathway is confluent, with branches responsible for protocatechuate and catechol catabolism converging at PcaL, a β-ketoadipate enol-lactonase (Patrauchan et al., 2005; Yam et al., 2010). However, some rhodococci appear to have pathways responsible for the catabolism of alkylated aromatic compounds via meta-cleavage (Jang et al., 2005). Elucidating 4-alkylphenol metabolism in rhodococci will improve our understanding of Actinobacterial aromatic degradation and support the development of Rhodococcus strains as platforms for industrial lignin upgrading. Genomic islands (GIs) are DNA segments likely to have been acquired by horizontal gene transfer. They are characterized by altered nucleotide characteristics (e.g., GC content), syntenic conservation, and frequent presence of mobility genes [transposases, insertion sequences (IS), and integrases] (Hacker and Kaper, 2000; Juhas et al., 2009). They can be further identified by the absence of genomic regions in closely related strains (Hacker et al., 1990). GIs can confer resistance, virulence, symbiosis, and catabolic pathways (Dobrindt et al., 2004; Juhas et al., 2009). For example, the self-transferable clc element enabling 3- and 4-chlorocatechol and 2-aminophenol catabolism was identified as a GI in several Gamma- and Betaproteobacteria strains (Gaillard et al., 2006). Recent horizontal gene transfer may have played less of a role in shaping the Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 genome than in other bacteria such as Burkholderia xenovorans LB400, which has a similarly sized genome (McLeod et al., 2006). Further, although RHA1 contains a high number of aromatic pathways, genes encoding these pathways are slightly underrepresented in the identified GIs. GIs can ameliorate in host genomes through nucleotide optimization or loss of mobility elements (Lawrence and Ochman, 1997; Juhas et al., 2009), reducing our effectiveness at predicting ancestral genomic additions. However, examination of GIs in multiple related genomes with an ensemble of predictive software can improve our understanding of the role of GIs in the evolution of bacterial catabolic pathways. This study sought to identify catabolic pathways required for 4-alkylphenol catabolism. We report on the genomic, transcriptomic, and enzymatic characterization of 4-alkylphenol catabolism in a newly isolated 4-ethylphenol-degrading bacterium, Rhodococcus rhodochrous EP4 (Figure 1A), as well as RHA1. The activity of a novel two-component alkylphenol monooxygenase (AphAB) was characterized. Gene deletion analysis was employed to identify the subsequent route of catechol catabolism. Genomic analysis identified a putative aph GI, providing new evolutionary insight into the aph meta-cleavage pathway in Rhodococcus. Knowledge gained by this study will facilitate the efficient valorization of lignin following its depolymerization.
Figure 1

Isolation and growth of 4-ethylphenol-catabolizing strain R. rhodochrous EP4. (A) Schematic of EP4 isolation from compost on 4-ethylphenol, which is produced from reductive lignin depolymerization. (B) Circular genome map for EP4. Outer genomic track: coding sequences by strand; inner track: insertion sequences; lines: GC content (%). MC, meta-cleavage pathway gene cluster; OC, ortho-cleavage pathway gene cluster. (C) Growth of EP4 on 1 mM 4-ethylphenol or 2 mM succinate controls as optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Points and error bars reflect mean and standard error (n = 3). (D) Colony-forming units (CFU) during growth in (B). Points and horizontal bar indicate individual measurements and mean. (E) Removal of 4-ethylphenol and succinate in EP4 cultures. (F) Growth of RHA1 on 1 mM 4-ethylphenol or 2 mM succinate. (G) CFU during growth in (F). (H) Removal of 4-ethylphenol and succinate in RHA1 cultures.

Isolation and growth of 4-ethylphenol-catabolizing strain R. rhodochrous EP4. (A) Schematic of EP4 isolation from compost on 4-ethylphenol, which is produced from reductive lignin depolymerization. (B) Circular genome map for EP4. Outer genomic track: coding sequences by strand; inner track: insertion sequences; lines: GC content (%). MC, meta-cleavage pathway gene cluster; OC, ortho-cleavage pathway gene cluster. (C) Growth of EP4 on 1 mM 4-ethylphenol or 2 mM succinate controls as optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Points and error bars reflect mean and standard error (n = 3). (D) Colony-forming units (CFU) during growth in (B). Points and horizontal bar indicate individual measurements and mean. (E) Removal of 4-ethylphenol and succinate in EP4 cultures. (F) Growth of RHA1 on 1 mM 4-ethylphenol or 2 mM succinate. (G) CFU during growth in (F). (H) Removal of 4-ethylphenol and succinate in RHA1 cultures.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

Liquid enrichment cultures were inoculated with either ~4-month-aged agricultural compost (~25 cm depth) from The University of British Columbia farm (49° 14' 57.8904” N, 123° 14' 0.0492” W) or forest soil from Pacific Spirit Park in Vancouver, Canada. The cultures contained 1.0 mM 4-ethylphenol (≥97.0% Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, U.S.A.) as sole organic substrate in M9-Goodies (Bauchop and Elsden, 1960; Elder, 1983). The cultures were incubated at 30°C with shaking at 200 rpm for 2 weeks. Removal of 4-ethylphenol was monitored by GC-MS, after which cultures were transferred to fresh medium, 0.5% inocula. After three serial transfers, isolates were obtained by plating on homologous medium solidified with 1.5% purified agar. Colonies appeared in 10 days. Individual colonies were transferred to liquid media and replated on solid media for colony isolation. R. rhodochrous strain DSM43241 was purchased from DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany). EP4 and RHA1 cultures for RNA extraction were grown overnight at 30°C on LB broth (200 rpm), diluted to 0.05 OD600, and washed thrice in M9 with no supplement, and grown to mid-log phase on 50 ml M9-Goodies with 1.0 mM 4-ethylphenol or succinate. EP4 was additionally grown on 1.0 mM benzoate (99%, Sigma-Aldrich). Additional screening of EP4, R. rhodochrous DSM43241, RHA1, and mutant strains used 5 ml of M9-Goodies with 1.0 mM phenol (≥99%, VWR International, Ltd., Mississauga, Canada), 3-methylphenol (m-cresol; 99% Sigma-Aldrich), 4-methylphenol (99% Sigma-Aldrich), 4-propylphenol (> 99%, TCI), 3,4-dimethylphenol (DMP) (99% Sigma-Aldrich), 2,4-DMP (98% Sigma-Aldrich), 4-hydroxyphenylacetate (HPA) (98% Sigma-Aldrich), 4-hydroxybenzioic acid (HBA) (99%, Sigma-Aldrich), or 0.5 mM 4-nitrophenol (NP) (≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich), incubated for 24 h. Cells were lysed by boiling in 1 M NaOH and protein quantified using the Micro BCA™ Protein Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, U.S.A.) and a VersaMax™ microplate reader (Molecular Devices LLC, San Jose, U.S.A.).

DNA Manipulation, Plasmid Construction, and Gene Deletion

DNA was isolated, manipulated, and analyzed using standard protocols (Sambrock and Russel, 2001). E. coli and RHA1 were transformed with DNA by electroporation using a MicroPulser with GenePulser cuvettes (Bio-Rad). To produce N-terminal His6-tagged AphAEP4, AphBEP4, and AphCRHA1 (see Table 1), C6369_RS01585, C6369_RS01550, and RHA1_RS18750 were amplified from genomic DNA using Phusion Polymerase™ with the oligonucleotides listed in Supplementary Table 1. The nucleotide sequence of the cloned genes was verified. The ΔaphA and ΔaphC mutants were constructed using a sacB counter selection system (van der Geize et al., 2007). Five hundred-base pair flanking regions of RHA1_RS18785 and RHA1_RS18750 were amplified from RHA1 genomic DNA using the primers listed in Supplementary Table 1. The resulting amplicons were inserted into pK18mobsacB linearized with EcoRI using Gibson Assembly. The nucleotide sequences of the resulting constructs were verified. Kanamycin-sensitive/sucrose-resistant colonies were screened using PCR, and the gene deletion was confirmed by sequencing.
Table 1

Genes in the alkylphenol meta-cleavage pathway.

GeneEP4aRHA1bProductcBest Hitd% IDeReferences
aphARS01585RS18785 (89%)Alkylphenol hydroxylase, oxygenase4-Nitrophenol 2-monooxygenase, oxygenase (NphA1) Q8RQQ087Takeo et al., 2003
aphBRS01580RS18780 (85%)Alkylphenol hydroxylase, reductaseNADH-dependent flavin reductase (NphB1) Q8RQP981Takeo et al., 2003
aphCRS01550RS18750 (87%)Alkylcatechol 2,3-dioxygenaseBiphenyl-2,3-diol 1,2-dioxygenase (BphC)f Q0S9X187PDB entry, unpublished
aphDRS01565RS18765 (89%)5-Alkyl-2-hydroxy-muconate-6-semialdehyde dehydrogenase4-Hydroxymuconic-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (DmpC) P1905945Nordlund and Shingler, 1990
aphERS01575, RS01600RS18775, RS18820 (69%)5-Alkyl-2-hydroxymuconate tautomerase2-Hydroxymuconate tautomerase (DmpI) P4917238Shingler et al., 1992
aphFRS01605RS18825 (85%)Enol 5-alkyl-2-oxalocrotonate decarboxylase4-Oxalocrotonate decarboxylase (NahK, DmpH) Q1XGK385Tsuda and Iino, 1990
aphGRS01610RS18830 (85%)2-Keto-4-alkylpentenoate hydratase2-Keto-4-pentenoate hydratase (MhpD) P7760842Pollard and Bugg, 1998
aphHRS01560RS18760 (93%)4-Hydroxy-2-alkylketopentenoate aldolase4-Hydroxy-2-oxovalerate aldolase (DmpG, MhpE) P5101648Shingler et al., 1992
aphIRS01555RS18755 (91%)Alkylacetaldehyde dehydrogenaseAcetaldehyde dehydrogenase (HsaG, MphF) P9WQH357Carere et al., 2013
aphRRS01590RS18790 (55%)Aph transcriptional regulatorAraC family transcriptional regulator Q88H3939Nelson et al., 2002
aphQRS01595RS18810 (64%)Aph transcriptional regulatorAraC family transcriptional regulator Q88H3936Nelson et al., 2002
aphSRS01615RS18835 (70%)Aph transcriptional regulatorIclR family transcriptional regulator Q0SH2331Pouyssegur and Stoeber, 1974

Locus in EP4 (C6369_RSXXXXX).

Locus in RHA1 (RHA1_RSXXXXX). Percent identity with EP4 homolog in parentheses.

Where “alkyl” represents the variable-length 4-alkyl side chain.

Gene name and Uniprot identifier of closest characterized homolog.

Percent identity of best hit and EP4 homolog determined by Clustal Omega alignment.

Also annotated as catechol 2,3-dioxygenase (DmpB).

Genes in the alkylphenol meta-cleavage pathway. Locus in EP4 (C6369_RSXXXXX). Locus in RHA1 (RHA1_RSXXXXX). Percent identity with EP4 homolog in parentheses. Where “alkyl” represents the variable-length 4-alkyl side chain. Gene name and Uniprot identifier of closest characterized homolog. Percent identity of best hit and EP4 homolog determined by Clustal Omega alignment. Also annotated as catechol 2,3-dioxygenase (DmpB).

Enzyme Production and Purification

The production and purification of AphAEP4, AphBEP4, and AphCRHA1 are described in Supplementary Methods.

GC/MS Analysis

Growth substrate depletion was analyzed in culture supernatants using an Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, U.S.A.) 6890N gas chromatograph equipped with a 30-m Agilent 190915-433 capillary column and a 5973 mass-selective detector (GC/MS). Briefly, 400-μl samples of culture supernatant were amended with 3-chlorobenzoic acid (as internal standard), extracted with ethyl acetate (1:1 v/v), and dried under a nitrogen stream. The extract was suspended in pyridine and derivatized with trimethylsilyl for 1 h at 60°C. One-microliter injections were analyzed using the following parameters: transfer line temperature of 325°C, run temperature of 90°C for 3 min, and then ramped to 290°C at 12°C min−1 with a 10-min final hold. Peaks from raw trace files were aligned and integrated using xcms in R 3.4.4 (R Core Team, 2016) against 4-ethylphenol and succinate standards. Values were normalized to the area of the internal standard and expressed as a percent of maximum peak area.

Nucleic Acid Extraction and Sequencing

RNA was extracted from cellular pellets from 15 ml of EP4 and RHA1 cultures using TRIzol™ (Thermo-Fisher) and Turbo™ DNase (Thermo-Fisher). Quality and quantity of nucleic acids were assessed using 1% [w/v] agarose gel electrophoresis and Qubit fluorometric quantitation (Thermo-Fisher), prior to storage at −80°C. Approximately 1 μg of RNA underwent Ribo-Zero rRNA removal (Illumina, San Diego, U.S.A.), TruSeq LT (Illumina) library preparation, and sequencing using HiSeq4000 2 × 100 bp. Genomic DNA was extracted using CTAB. Fifteen micrograms was pulse-field electrophoresis size-selected and sequenced with one Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) RS II SMRT cell.

Bioinformatics

A de novo draft genome was assembled with HGAP in the SMRT Analysis v2.3 pipeline (Chin et al., 2013) and MeDuSa 1.6 scaffolding (Bosi et al., 2015). Circularizing the genome sequence was attempted using Circlator 1.5.5 (Hunt et al., 2015), and plasmid detection was attempted using PlasmidFinder 2.0.1 (Carattoli et al., 2014). Annotation used the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) 4.4 and BLASTp against the Protein Data Bank (e-value 10−3). Quality control, filtering, and trimming of RNA reads used Trimmomatic 0.3.6 defaults (Bolger et al., 2014). Assembly used Trinity 2.4.0 (Grabherr et al., 2011). Transcript quantification used HTSeq 0.9.1 (Anders et al., 2015), FeatureCounts 1.5.0-p3 (Liao et al., 2014), and Salmon 0.8.1 (Patro et al., 2017). Differential expression was analyzed using DeSeq2 1.18.1 (Love et al., 2014) with false discovery rate (fdr) correction. RT-qPCR conditions are in Supplementary Methods. All data visualization used ggplot2 3.1.0 unless otherwise noted.

Phylogenomic Characterization

Protein sequences were structurally aligned with T-Coffee 11.00 Expresso (Armougom et al., 2006); maximum-likelihood trees were generated using the best of 100 RAxML 8.0.0 iterations using the PROTGAMMALG model (Stamatakis, 2014) and visualized with iTOL v4 (Letunic and Bork, 2016). GI regions were predicted with IslandViewer 4 (Hsiao et al., 2003; Bertelli et al., 2017). All available Rhodococcus genomes (n = 325) were downloaded from NCBI RefSeq. Genomic alignment with a subset of genomes (Supplementary Table 2) used nucmer 3.1 (Marçais et al., 2018) and visualized with circlize 0.4.5 (Gu et al., 2014). Ribosomal protein trees were constructed as in Hug et al. (2016).

Enzyme Assays

AphABEP4 activity was measured spectrophotometrically by following the meta-cleavage of the produced 4-ethylcatechol in a coupled assay with AphCRHA1 at 25 ± 0.5°C. The standard assay was performed in 200 μl of air-saturated 20 mM MOPS and 90 mM NaCl (I = 0.1 mM, pH 7.2) containing 0.5 mM 4-ethylphenol, 5 μM AphAEP4, 1 μM AphBEP4, 0.2 μMAphCRHA1, 1,000 U ml−1 of catalase, 1 mM NADH, and 2.5 μM FAD. Components were incubated for 30 s, and then the reaction was initiated by adding NADH and was monitored at 400 nm. Absorbance was monitored using a Varian Cary 5000 spectrophotometer controlled by WinUV software. One unit of activity, U, was defined as the amount of enzyme required to hydroxylate of 1 nmol substrate per minute. Extinction coefficients for methyl-, ethyl-, and propylcatechol cleavage at 400 nm were 18,600, 15,100, and 19,400 M−1 cm−1, respectively, calculated by differences in liberation of O2 from alkylcatechol cleavage by 0.2 nmol AphCRHA1 monitored using a Clark-type polarographic O2 electrode OXYG1 (Hansatech, Pentney, UK) connected to a circulating water bath. Details of additional enzyme end point assays are provided in the Supplementary Methods.

Results

Isolation and Genomic Characterization of a 4-Ethylphenol-Degrading Rhodococcus Strain

In order to isolate environmental strains capable of degrading alkylphenols, enrichment cultures with 4-ethylphenol as a sole organic growth substrate were inoculated with either forest soil or compost and incubated at 30°C. Those cultures inoculated with compost demonstrated superior potential for 4-ethylphenol degradation and were used for subsequent isolation of strain EP4. The 16S rRNA gene (27F-1492R; Lane, 1991) of EP4 shared 100% sequence identity with that of R. rhodochrous NBRC 16069. De novo assembly produced a 5.72-Mb, high-quality, single-scaffold EP4 genome sequence (Figure 1B) containing 5,198 predicted genes: 4,942 protein coding sequences, 12 rRNAs, 54 tRNAs, three other RNAs, and 187 pseudogenes. Only a single origin of replication (oriC) was found, at 1,863,144 bp, and no plasmids were detected (Supplementary Table 2). The lack of PacBio long reads overlapping the 5′ and 3′ genome regions indicated that the EP4 genome is linear. EP4 grew on 1.0 mM 4-ethylphenol to stationary phase within 14 h in shake flasks (Figure 1C). Growth on 4-ethylphenol was verified by plating CFUs (Figure 1D). GC-MS analysis indicated that 4-ethylphenol was completely removed from the medium during growth (Figure 1E), with no metabolites detected.

Quasi-Mapping-Based Quantification of Prokaryotic Gene Expression

We used transcriptomics to identify 4-ethylphenol catabolic genes in EP4 without a priori bias. Transcriptome reads were aligned strand-wise to predict transcriptional start sites in the EP4 genome (Figure 2A). Read alignment is a common but time-consuming step in prokaryotic RNA-Seq pipelines (Supplementary Figure 1A). We therefore compared quasi-mapping to genomic coding regions using Salmon (Patro et al., 2017) with alignment-based read counting software. Salmon results were numerically (Supplementary Figure 1B) and statistically equivalent (p = 0.21) (Supplementary Figure 1C) to FeatureCounts, with strong correlation to RT-qPCR expression ( = 0.91, p < 0.001) (Supplementary Figure 1D). Salmon was about eight times faster than FeatureCounts and superior to htseq in terms of total counts and accuracy and was therefore used for gene quantification prior to differential expression analysis using DESeq2.
Figure 2

Transcriptomic and genomic identification of the 4-ethylphenol catabolic pathway genes in R. rhodochrous EP4. (A) RNA reads from cells grown on 4-ethylphenol or succinate mapped to the EP4 gene clusters encoding catechol meta-cleavage and ortho-cleavage. (B) Deseq2 differential-expression analysis showing log2 fold-change (FC) on 4-ethylphenol vs. succinate (FDR-corrected p values: *pfdr < 0.001). Points show values for n = 3 replicates; horizontal bar indicates mean. P450, cytochrome P450 gene; Red., P450 reductase. (C) Proposed funneling of 4-ethylphenol into the alkylcatechol meta-cleavage pathway (upper) and not the phenol ortho-cleavage pathway (lower). TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle.

Transcriptomic and genomic identification of the 4-ethylphenol catabolic pathway genes in R. rhodochrous EP4. (A) RNA reads from cells grown on 4-ethylphenol or succinate mapped to the EP4 gene clusters encoding catechol meta-cleavage and ortho-cleavage. (B) Deseq2 differential-expression analysis showing log2 fold-change (FC) on 4-ethylphenol vs. succinate (FDR-corrected p values: *pfdr < 0.001). Points show values for n = 3 replicates; horizontal bar indicates mean. P450, cytochrome P450 gene; Red., P450 reductase. (C) Proposed funneling of 4-ethylphenol into the alkylcatechol meta-cleavage pathway (upper) and not the phenol ortho-cleavage pathway (lower). TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle.

Transcriptomic Analysis of 4-Ethylphenol Metabolism via meta-Cleavage

Growth on 4-ethylphenol vs. succinate significantly modulated expression of 559 genes with p < 0.001. Nine of the 16 most upregulated genes occurred in a cluster encoding a proposed alkylphenol catabolic pathway, aphABCDEFGHIQRS (Table 1). This cluster includes aphAB, encoding a two-component alkylphenol hydroxylase discussed below, and aphC, encoding an extradiol dioxygenase that we subsequently identified as alkylcatechol 2,3-dioxygenase. The aphA gene displayed the highest upregulation on 4-ethylphenol. The gene cluster is organized as four putative operons based on transcriptomic data and operon prediction with BPROM: aphAB, aphHIDE, aphE2FGS, and aphG2H2I2 (Figure 2A). The deduced Aph pathway catabolizes 4-ethylphenol to pyruvate and butyryl-CoA (Figure 2C), similar to the Dmp pathway of Pseudomonas sp. strain CF600 that catabolizes dimethylphenols (Shingler et al., 1992) and phenol (Powlowski and Shingler, 1994). Based on the transcriptomic data, the resultant butyryl-CoA is degraded to central metabolites by an aerobic fatty acid degradation pathway (Jimenez-Diaz et al., 2017) encoded by butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase genes (locus tags: C6369_RS06395, C6369_RS20140, C6369_RS07820, C6369_RS05465), enoylCoA hydratase (C6369 _RS19405, C6369_RS19860), 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase (C6369_RS03325, C6369_RS06400), and acetyl-CoA acyltransferase (C6369_RS17095, C6369_RS15900, C6369_RS19850) (Supplementary Figure 2). The catABC cluster encoding catechol 1,2-dioxygenase and other enzymes feeding into the β-ketoadipate pathway was also significantly upregulated during growth on 4-ethylphenol, although much less highly than the aph genes. No ortho-cleavage metabolites were detected in the culture supernatants (Figure 1D), and the genes encoding the downstream β-ketoadipate pathway, pcaBLIJ, were not upregulated (Figure 2B). Overall, the data suggest that 4-ethyphenol is catabolized via meta-cleavage.

Characterization of a Two-Component Akylphenol Hydroxylase, AphAB

We hypothesized that the highly upregulated aphA gene (L2FC = 11.5) encodes the oxygenase component of a novel alkylphenol monooxygenase, based on its location within the aph cluster as well as the phylogenetic and functional data presented below. The aphB gene, encoding a flavin reductase was co-transcribed with aphA (Figures 2A,B). The upregulation of aphA and aphC genes in EP4 during growth on 4-ethylphenol was confirmed using RT-qPCR (Supplementary Figure 3). To establish the physiological role of AphAB from EP4, the oxygenase, and reductase components were each overproduced in E. coli and purified to apparent homogeneity. The reconstituted AphABEP4 hydroxylated 4-ethylphenol to 4-ethylcatechol (Figure 3A). The enzyme also catalyzed the hydroxylation of 4-methylphenol, 4-propylphenol (Figure 3B), and, to a much lesser extent, 4-NP (Figure 3C). However, AphABEP4 did not detectably transform phenol (Figure 3B) or 4-HPA (Figure 3C). In an assay measuring cytochrome c reduction, AphBEP4 preferentially utilized NADH and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) (Figure 3D), as reported for PheB homologs (Straube, 1987; Saa et al., 2010; Gröning et al., 2014).
Figure 3

Characterization of AphABEP4. (A) Hydroxylation of 4-ethylphenol to 4-ethlycatechol by purified AphABEP4. Reaction mixtures contained 20 μM of each enzyme component and 100 μM substrate, and were incubated overnight. (B) Specific activity of AphABEP4 for select phenols. Activity was measured using a coupled, spectrophotometric assay. (C) Transformation of 4-HPA and 4-NP by AphABEP4. Conditions as in (A). (D) Cofactor and substrate preference of AphBEP4. Reductase activity was measured using cytochrome c. (E) Phylogenetic tree constructed using structural-based alignment and RAxML. HPA, hydroxyphenylacetate; NP, nitrophenol; FAD, flavin adenine dinucleotide; FMN, flavin mononucleotide; RF, riboflavin.

Characterization of AphABEP4. (A) Hydroxylation of 4-ethylphenol to 4-ethlycatechol by purified AphABEP4. Reaction mixtures contained 20 μM of each enzyme component and 100 μM substrate, and were incubated overnight. (B) Specific activity of AphABEP4 for select phenols. Activity was measured using a coupled, spectrophotometric assay. (C) Transformation of 4-HPA and 4-NP by AphABEP4. Conditions as in (A). (D) Cofactor and substrate preference of AphBEP4. Reductase activity was measured using cytochrome c. (E) Phylogenetic tree constructed using structural-based alignment and RAxML. HPA, hydroxyphenylacetate; NP, nitrophenol; FAD, flavin adenine dinucleotide; FMN, flavin mononucleotide; RF, riboflavin.

Annotation of Additional Genes

During growth of EP4 on 4-ethylphenol, genes encoding phenol hydroxylase oxygenase and reductase, pheA and pheB, respectively, adjacent to the cat gene cluster, were additionally upregulated in a single putative regulon (Figure 2B and Supplementary Figure 3). In structure-based alignments, PheAEP4 and AphAEP4 clustered with separate 4-NP hydroxylases, rather than the clade of characterized phenol hydroxylases (Figure 3E). More specifically, PheAEP4 and AphAEP4 clustered most closely, respectively, with NphA1 from Rhodococcus sp. BUBNP1 (WP_059382681.1; Sengupta et al., 2019) and NphA1 from Rhodococcus sp. PN1 (Q8RQQ0; Takeo et al., 2003). Despite 100% sequence identity with NphA1BUBNP1, PheAEP4 was annotated based on sequence similarity to known phenol hydroxylases (Figure 3E). In support of this annotation, EP4 lacks a 4-NP catabolism gene cluster and was unable to grow on 4-NP, while it did grow on phenol (discussed below). PheA EP4 shares 82% identity with PheA1(1) (ABS30825.1) in Rhodococcus erythropolis UPV-1 (Saa et al., 2010) and 65% identity with a chlorophenol 4-monooxygenase (Q8GMG6) from Streptomyces globisporus (Liu et al., 2002; Supplementary Table 3; Supplementary Figure 4). These similarities suggest that PheAEP4 may have broad substrate specificity. In EP4, genes encoding AraC-family transcriptional regulators (TRs) were found directly adjacent to and in the opposite orientation as aphAB and pheAB (Figure 2A and Supplementary Figure 5). These AraC-family TRs were annotated as AphR and PheR, respectively. Another AraC-family TR is encoded by a gene immediately downstream of aphR, which has a distinct phylogeny from AphR (Supplementary Figure 5) and was annotated as AphQ. Finally, an IclR-family TR is encoded by the last gene of the aphE2FGS operon.

Syntenic Conservation of EP4 aph Gene Cluster in Rhodococci

The above comparative analyses of hydroxylase proteins revealed homologs of the EP4 aphA gene in several other rhodococci. In RHA1, a putative aphA gene (Table 1) was previously annotated as an aromatic ring hydroxylase possibly involved in steroid degradation (McLeod et al., 2006) and there were three previously identified pheA homologs (Supplementary Table 3; Gröning et al., 2014). Local alignment of the 13 Aph proteins against proteins predicted from all 325 Rhodococcus genomes identified 75 strains with full or partial (≥7 genes) putative Aph pathways, including RHA1 (Supplementary Figure 6A). Related pathways were also found in other Actinobacteria, but this study focused on the rhodococcal pathway. RHA1 aph genes displayed syntenic conservation with the EP4 aph cluster (Figure 4), except for an additional butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase gene (RHA1_RS18815). The aphCHIDE region was conserved in all aph-containing genomes based on nucmer alignment (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 6B). The EP4 and RHA1 Aph proteins shared 55% to 93% identity (median = 86%) (Table 1).
Figure 4

Identification of a putative aph genomic island in rhodococci. Alignment of Rhodococcus genomes to EP4 reference with nucmer ordered by RAxML tree calculated from concatenated alignment of 16 ribosomal protein sequences, predicted RHA1 genomic islands, GC content (%), and syntentic organization of aph gene clusters showing genomic islands predicted using IslandViewer4. Nucmer alignment regions shown with dashed line. aphA, 4-alkylphenol 3-monooxygenase, oxygenase gene; aphB, 4-alkylphenol 3-monooxygenase, reductase gene; aphC, alkylcatechol 2,3-dioxygenase gene; bph, biphenyl catabolism gene cluster; P450, cytochrome P450 gene; Red., P450 reductase. The single origin of replication (oriC) shown with orange diamond. Detail of the aph region alignments in Supplementary Figure 6B.

Identification of a putative aph genomic island in rhodococci. Alignment of Rhodococcus genomes to EP4 reference with nucmer ordered by RAxML tree calculated from concatenated alignment of 16 ribosomal protein sequences, predicted RHA1 genomic islands, GC content (%), and syntentic organization of aph gene clusters showing genomic islands predicted using IslandViewer4. Nucmer alignment regions shown with dashed line. aphA, 4-alkylphenol 3-monooxygenase, oxygenase gene; aphB, 4-alkylphenol 3-monooxygenase, reductase gene; aphC, alkylcatechol 2,3-dioxygenase gene; bph, biphenyl catabolism gene cluster; P450, cytochrome P450 gene; Red., P450 reductase. The single origin of replication (oriC) shown with orange diamond. Detail of the aph region alignments in Supplementary Figure 6B. Identification of aph genes in RHA1 motivated us to test its growth on alklyphenols. Consistent with the occurrence of the putative Aph pathway in RHA1, this strain grew on 4-ethylphenol (Figures 1F– H, 5A), with concomitant upregulation of the aph genes (Figure 5B). Specifically, aphA and aphC were highly upregulated (L2FC, 14.3 and 10.0, respectively). In contrast to EP4, when RHA1 grew on 4-ethylphenol, it did not upregulate any of its three pheA genes or any of the ring-cleavage dioxygenase genes associated with the pheA genes, including catA (RHA1_RS11595), catA2 (RHA1_RS35920), and a plasmid-borne catechol 2,3-dioxygenase gene (RHA1_RS35970; McLeod et al., 2006; Figure 5B).
Figure 5

Molecular genetic analysis of 4-ethylphenol catabolism in RHA1. (A) Growth of WT, ΔaphA, and ΔaphC1 RHA1 strains on 1 mM 4-ethylphenol or 2 mM succinate. (B) Expression of select genes in WT and ΔaphA RHA1 strains during growth on 1 mM 4-ethylphenol or 2 mM succinate using RT-qPCR. Colors indicate cleavage pathway. Points and horizontal bars show individual measurements (n = 3) and mean. Significance levels following Bonferroni-corrected two-tailed Student's t-tests (*pbon < 0.05; **pbon < 0.01; ***pbon < 0.001). (C) Protein yield of WT, ΔaphC, and ΔpcaL RHA1 strains as well as EP4 and R. rhodochrous DSM43241 on phenolic substrates. Protein measured after 24 h incubation. DMP, dimethylphenol; EP, ethylphenol; HBA, hydroxybenzoic acid; HPA; hydroxyphenylacetate; MP, methylphenol; NP, nitrophenol; PP, propylphenol.

Molecular genetic analysis of 4-ethylphenol catabolism in RHA1. (A) Growth of WT, ΔaphA, and ΔaphC1 RHA1 strains on 1 mM 4-ethylphenol or 2 mM succinate. (B) Expression of select genes in WT and ΔaphA RHA1 strains during growth on 1 mM 4-ethylphenol or 2 mM succinate using RT-qPCR. Colors indicate cleavage pathway. Points and horizontal bars show individual measurements (n = 3) and mean. Significance levels following Bonferroni-corrected two-tailed Student's t-tests (*pbon < 0.05; **pbon < 0.01; ***pbon < 0.001). (C) Protein yield of WT, ΔaphC, and ΔpcaL RHA1 strains as well as EP4 and R. rhodochrous DSM43241 on phenolic substrates. Protein measured after 24 h incubation. DMP, dimethylphenol; EP, ethylphenol; HBA, hydroxybenzoic acid; HPA; hydroxyphenylacetate; MP, methylphenol; NP, nitrophenol; PP, propylphenol.

Gene Deletion Analysis of 4-Alkylphenol Ring Cleavage

Efforts to genetically transform EP4 were unsuccessful. However, the above analysis demonstrated the presence of the Aph pathway in RHA1, a strain with existing gene deletion mutants and well-studied systems for genetic manipulation. Because RHA1 is genetically tractable and contains an orthologous Aph pathway, we constructed ΔaphA and ΔaphC deletion mutants and used these together with an existing ΔpcaL mutant to further investigate 4-ethylphenol catabolism. The ΔaphC mutant did not grow on either 1.0 mM 4-ethylphenol or 4-propylphenol (Figures 5A,C) demonstrating that both compounds are exclusively metabolized by meta-cleavage. No metabolites, including 4-ethylcatechol, accumulated in the culture supernatant, possibly due to lack of excretion of any transformed products (data not shown). However, ΔaphA did grow on 4-ethylphenol (Figure 5A). It appears that one or more of three PheA homologs from RHA1 may catalyze 4-ethylphenol hydroxylation and compensate for the deletion of aphA. While the corresponding pheA genes were not upregulated in wild-type RHA1 growing on 4-ethylphenol vs. succinate, they were upregulated 7.6 to 8.8 L2FC in the ΔaphA mutant (Figure 5B), while the plasmid-borne C23D gene was not upregulated. Finally, the ΔpcaL mutant grew on alkylphenols but did not grow on either phenol or 4-HBA, indicating that the latter two substrates are catabolized solely via ortho-cleavage pathways (Figure 5C).

Identification of a Putative aph GI

The aph gene cluster (~17 kb) occurs within 117 and 4.2 kb regions predicted to be two of 61 GIs (or 38 non-overlapping GI regions) identified in EP4 using IslandViewer4 (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 2). These GI elements do not include aphAB or aphE in EP4, but do in three other Rhodococcus strains. These putative GIs are located near the 3′ end of the EP4 chromosome assembly in a 600-kb region of apparent genomic instability, as it contains high IS density (Figure 1A) and 36 predicted GIs (Figure 4). The GI-like characteristics of these elements containing the aph cluster include a −5.8% deviation from the mean GC content, presence of mobility genes (integrases, transposases, ISs), and absence of the region in closely related genomes following alignment (Langille et al., 2008; Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 6). They are not located near a tRNA sequence, indicating that it is not likely a mobile integrative and conjugative element (ICE) (Burrus and Waldor, 2004). More generally, 7.4% of the EP4 genome and 9.2% of the RHA1 genome were predicted to occur on GIs (Supplementary Table 2). Analysis of 37 complete, full-length Rhodococcus genomes found that 16 carried genes encoding a complete Aph pathway. The aph genes are predicted to be fully or partially contained in a GI in six of these strains and to occur immediately downstream of a GI in a seventh, RHA1. This genomic region was conserved in three Rhodococcus clades: one containing EP4 and R. pyridinivorans strains; one containing R. jostii, R. opacus, and Rhodococcus wratislaviensis strains; and one containing Rhodococcus sp. Eu32 (Supplementary Figure 6). With the exception of a partial aph cluster in R. rhodochrous ATCC 21198, the aph genes were not found in any of the 13 other R. rhodochrous genomes including strain DSM43241. Accordingly, DSM43241 could not grow on 4-ethylphenol and 4-propylphenol, but grew on phenol, 4-HBA, 3-methylphenol, and 4-methylphenol (Figure 5C).

Discussion

In this study, we used a variety of approaches to identify an Aph pathway responsible for the catabolism of alkylphenols via meta-cleavage in Rhodococcus. Catabolism is initiated by AphAB, a two-component hydroxylase that transforms the alkylphenol to the corresponding alkylcatechol (Figures 2, 3). To date, only six-component proteobacterial alkylphenol hydroxylases have been reported (Arai et al., 2000; Jeong et al., 2003). The ensuing Aph pathway generates pyruvate and an acyl-CoA following meta-cleavage of 4-alkylcatechol. The length of the acyl-CoA produced depends on the alkyl side chain of the growth substrate. This is in contrast to the Phe and Nph pathways that catabolize phenol and 4-NP, respectively, via ortho-cleavage (Takeo et al., 2008; Szoköl et al., 2014; Sengupta et al., 2019). The activity of AphABEP4 is consistent with its phylogenetic relationship with two-component phenolic hydroxylases. Thus, the clade containing AphAEP4 and AphARHA1 includes an NphA1 but no characterized PheA or HpaB (Figure 3). In keeping with this classification, AphABEP4 had weak activity with 4-NP (Figure 3C) but did not detectably transform phenol or 4-HPA. However, the determinants of substrate specificity of these enzymes are not clear. The catalytic residues of these hydroxylases (Kim et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2016) are conserved in AphA: Arg119, Tyr123, and His161 (AphAEP4 numbering; Supplementary Figure 4). In a structurally characterized HpaB:4-HPA binary complex, the substrate's carboxylate is coordinated by Ser197 and Thr198 (Kim et al., 2007). In PheA, NphA, and AphA, these residues are His214 and Tyr215, suggesting that they do not contribute to the enzyme's substrate specificity despite their predicted interaction with the para-substituent of the substrate. The Aph pathway is similar to the Dmp pathway described in Pseudomonas sp. strain CF600 (Shingler et al., 1992). However, it is clear that the Aph pathway has a distinct substrate specificity because neither EP4 nor RHA1 grew on 2,4- or 3,4-DMP (Figure 5C) and aph pathway mutants of RHA1 grew on phenol. We had previously suggested that some of the aph genes could be involved in steroid degradation (McLeod et al., 2006) due to their similarity to known steroid catabolic genes (van der Geize et al., 2007). Further, in a recently published structure of AphCRHA1, the enzyme was identified as 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl dioxygenase (Table 1). However, AphC is encoded in a gene cluster upregulated on 4-alkylphenols and is essential for growth of RHA1 on those compounds, supporting annotation of this rhodococcal Aph meta-cleavage pathway, with AphC as an alkylcatechol 2,3-dioxygenase. 4-Ethylphenol strongly induced aphAB expression. This is likely due to positive induction of the AphR TR, just as phenol activates pheA2A1 expression by PheR in RHA1 (Szoköl et al., 2014), and 4-NP activates npaA2A1 expression by NphR in Rhodococcus sp. PN1 (Takeo et al., 2008). AphR was identified based on conservation or syntentic organization relative to PheRAB, as both TR elements are expressed in opposition to their respective oxygenase components. AphR, PheR, and NphR are all AraC-family TRs. AphR and PheR may play a role in the unexpected ability of the RHA1 ΔaphA mutant to grow on 4-ethylphenol. The lack of pheA1-3 expression in wild-type RHA1 (Figure 5B) strikingly contrasts with the upregulation of these genes in the ΔaphA mutant (Figure 5C). This phenomenon requires further study, as aphR and pheR bear little phylogenetic similarity (Supplementary Figure 5A). Indeed, the putative aphA promotor sequences (−10: CAGGAG; −35: CCGTCT) (Supplementary Figure 5B) bear more similarity to the T80 promotor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Bashyam et al., 1996) than with the rhodococcal pheA promotors. Related to this, homologs of PheAB in R. opacus 1CP hydroxylated 4-methylphenol with about twice the specific activity as with phenol (Gröning et al., 2014), further suggesting that the RHA1 PheABs may hydroxylate 4-ethylphenol. In addition to 4-ethylphenol, alkylguaiacols and alkylsyringols commonly occur in lignin depolymerization streams (Ye et al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2015; Anderson et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2017; Asawaworarit et al., 2019). Interestingly, genes encoding a cytochrome P450 and reductase are linked to the aph clusters in some rhodococci (Figures 2, 4). Further, these were the second and third most highly upregulated genes in EP4 during growth on 4-ethylphenol versus succinate (both L2FC = 11.1; Figure 2B). The P450 shares 65% sequence identity with a guaiacol O-demethylase (Mallinson et al., 2018), suggesting that the rhodococcal enzyme has a similar role, and that these strains may also funnel methoxylated compounds into the Aph pathway. The ability of RHA1 and EP4 to catabolize 4-ethylphenol and other alkylphenols is of potential use in upgrading lignin streams generated by RCF and other depolymerization strategies. The Aph meta-cleavage pathway harbored by these strains contrasts with the ortho-cleavage pathways targeted to date in the design of biocatalysts for lignin valorization (Abdelaziz et al., 2016; Beckham et al., 2016; Barton et al., 2018). This is largely due to the identified economic potential of some of the ortho-cleavage metabolites. For example, cis, cis-muconate resulting from ortho-cleavage can be used to make adipic acid and terephthalic acid (Xie et al., 2014; Beckham et al., 2016; Barton et al., 2018). However, alkylphenols may be funneled through ortho-cleavage by oxidizing the para-side chain to 4-hydroxyacetophenone or hydroquinone (Darby et al., 1987). Alternatively, oleaginous Rhodococcus strains such as RHA1 may be modified to use the Aph pathway to produce lipid-based commodity chemicals (e.g., Round et al., 2017) offering a method for valorization of alkylphenols via fatty-acid synthesis in this genus. We found genes encoding the Aph pathway in several Rhodococcus strains, including oleaginous strains such as RHA1 and R. opacus B4 (Figures 3A, 4). However, the absence of an aph cluster in most R. rhodochrous strains (e.g., DSM43241) demonstrates that phylogenetically related strains can have important metabolic differences. Previous studies suggested that recent horizontal gene transfer did not play a large role in generating RHA1's considerable catabolic capabilities (McLeod et al., 2006). In several rhodococci, putative GIs did not contain all of the aph genes. This could represent the imprecision of the prediction tools, incomplete amelioration of the element, or reflect that these GIs arose from separate insertion events. Patchwork aph GIs are consistent with the theorized modular origins of GIs (Juhas et al., 2009). Fermentation of plant-derived aromatic compounds, including cinnamic acids, by yeasts and lactic acid bacteria can naturally produce alkylphenols (Caboni et al., 2007; Kridelbaugh et al., 2010). The apparent complete loss of the aph genes in other R. rhodochrous strains may result without selective alkylphenol exposure if it otherwise has a deleterious effect on overall fitness. Testing these regions for their excision capacity was beyond the scope of this work, but remains an intriguing prospect. We posit that the presence of aromatic compounds in compost selected for microorganisms capable of 4-ethylphenol catabolism, including EP4. In this study, we described a newly isolated, 4-ethylphenol-catabolizing strain, EP4, a novel alkylphenol hydroxylase, AphAB, and its role in funneling alkylphenols into the Aph meta-cleavage pathway in some Rhodococcus strains. We showed that this pathway is associated with putative GIs, primarily found in strains from contaminated soil environments. Characterizing 4-ethylphenol metabolism in EP4 and RHA1 advances our capacity for bio-refinement of reductively depolymerized lignin subunits from sustainable chemical feedstocks.

Data Availability

The EP4 genome assembly can be downloaded from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCA_003004765.2). The transcriptome data can be downloaded from SRA at accessions SRR6877528–SRR6877536. All data can be downloaded and the full transcriptomic analysis can be run using a custom pipeline found at: https://github.com/levybooth/Rhodococcus_Transcriptomics.

Author Contributions

DL-B performed all genomic and transcriptomic analysis, performed growth experiments, and wrote the manuscript. MF performed growth and enzymological experiments, and edited the manuscript. GS isolated the EP4 strain. JL produced the RHA1 mutants. WM and LE designed the study and edited the manuscript. DL-B and MF contributed equally to this work.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  67 in total

1.  IslandPath: aiding detection of genomic islands in prokaryotes.

Authors:  William Hsiao; Ivan Wan; Steven J Jones; Fiona S L Brinkman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Biosynthesis of the enediyne antitumor antibiotic C-1027.

Authors:  Wen Liu; Steven D Christenson; Scott Standage; Ben Shen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The growth of micro-organisms in relation to their energy supply.

Authors:  T BAUCHOP; S R ELSDEN
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1960-12

Review 4.  Genomic islands in pathogenic and environmental microorganisms.

Authors:  Ulrich Dobrindt; Bianca Hochhut; Ute Hentschel; Jörg Hacker
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Arrangement and regulation of the genes for meta-pathway enzymes required for degradation of phenol in Comamonas testosteroni TA441.

Authors:  H Arai; T Ohishi; M Y Chang; T Kudo
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 6.  Pathogenicity islands and the evolution of microbes.

Authors:  J Hacker; J B Kaper
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 15.500

7.  Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of the metabolically versatile Pseudomonas putida KT2440.

Authors:  K E Nelson; C Weinel; I T Paulsen; R J Dodson; H Hilbert; V A P Martins dos Santos; D E Fouts; S R Gill; M Pop; M Holmes; L Brinkac; M Beanan; R T DeBoy; S Daugherty; J Kolonay; R Madupu; W Nelson; O White; J Peterson; H Khouri; I Hance; P Chris Lee; E Holtzapple; D Scanlan; K Tran; A Moazzez; T Utterback; M Rizzo; K Lee; D Kosack; D Moestl; H Wedler; J Lauber; D Stjepandic; J Hoheisel; M Straetz; S Heim; C Kiewitz; J A Eisen; K N Timmis; A Düsterhöft; B Tümmler; C M Fraser
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 8.  Lignin biosynthesis.

Authors:  Wout Boerjan; John Ralph; Marie Baucher
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 26.379

9.  Alkylphenol biotransformations catalyzed by 4-ethylphenol methylenehydroxylase.

Authors:  David J Hopper; Lisa Cottrell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  3- and 4-alkylphenol degradation pathway in Pseudomonas sp. strain KL28: genetic organization of the lap gene cluster and substrate specificities of phenol hydroxylase and catechol 2,3-dioxygenase.

Authors:  Jae Jun Jeong; Ji Hyun Kim; Chi-Kyung Kim; Ingyu Hwang; Kyoung Lee
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.777

View more
  4 in total

1.  Characterization of alkylguaiacol-degrading cytochromes P450 for the biocatalytic valorization of lignin.

Authors:  Morgan M Fetherolf; David J Levy-Booth; Laura E Navas; Jie Liu; Jason C Grigg; Andrew Wilson; Rui Katahira; Gregg T Beckham; William W Mohn; Lindsay D Eltis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Tailoring renewable materials via plant biotechnology.

Authors:  Lisanne de Vries; Sydne Guevara-Rozo; MiJung Cho; Li-Yang Liu; Scott Renneckar; Shawn D Mansfield
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 6.040

3.  Genomics and metatranscriptomics of biogeochemical cycling and degradation of lignin-derived aromatic compounds in thermal swamp sediment.

Authors:  David J Levy-Booth; Ameena Hashimi; Raphael Roccor; Li-Yang Liu; Scott Renneckar; Lindsay D Eltis; William W Mohn
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Analysis of the biodegradative and adaptive potential of the novel polychlorinated biphenyl degrader Rhodococcus sp. WAY2 revealed by its complete genome sequence.

Authors:  Daniel Garrido-Sanz; Paula Sansegundo-Lobato; Miguel Redondo-Nieto; Jachym Suman; Tomas Cajthaml; Esther Blanco-Romero; Marta Martin; Ondrej Uhlik; Rafael Rivilla
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2020-04-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.