Literature DB >> 31964795

Population Pharmacokinetic Study of the Suitability of Standard Dosing Regimens of Amikacin in Critically Ill Patients with Open-Abdomen and Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy.

Cédric Carrié1, Faustine Delzor2,3, Stéphanie Roure4, Vincent Dubuisson5, Laurent Petit4, Mathieu Molimard6,7, Dominique Breilh2,3, Matthieu Biais4,7.   

Abstract

The aim was to assess the appropriateness of recommended regimens for empirical MIC coverage in critically ill patients with open-abdomen and negative-pressure therapy (OA/NPT). Over a 5-year period, every critically ill patient who received amikacin and who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) while being treated by OA/NPT was retrospectively included. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling was performed considering the effect of 10 covariates (age, sex, total body weight [TBW], adapted body weight [ABW], body surface area [BSA], modified sepsis-related organ failure assessment [SOFA] score, vasopressor use, creatinine clearance [CLCR], fluid balance, and amount of fluids collected by the NPT over the sampling day) in patients who underwent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) or did not receive CRRT. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to determine the fractional target attainment (FTA) for the PK/pharmacodynamic [PD] targets (maximum concentration of drug [C max]/MIC ratio of ≥8 and a ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC0-24]/MIC of ≥75). Seventy critically ill patients treated by OA/NPT (contributing 179 concentration values) were included. Amikacin PK concentrations were best described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination and proportional residual error, with CLCR and ABW as significant covariates for volume of distribution (V) and CLCR for CL. The reported V) in non-CRRT and CRRT patients was 35.8 and 40.2 liters, respectively. In Monte Carlo simulations, ABW-adjusted doses between 25 and 35 mg/kg were needed to reach an FTA of >85% for various renal functions. Despite an increased V and a wide interindividual variability, desirable PK/PD targets may be achieved using an ABW-based loading dose of 25 to 30 mg/kg. When less susceptible pathogens are targeted, higher dosing regimens are probably needed in patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC). Further studies are needed to assess the effect of OA/NPT on the PK parameters of antimicrobial agents.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo simulation; amikacin; intensive care; negative-pressure therapy; open abdomen; pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31964795      PMCID: PMC7179257          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02098-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  35 in total

1.  Predictors of insufficient amikacin peak concentration in critically ill patients receiving a 25 mg/kg total body weight regimen.

Authors:  Etienne de Montmollin; Lila Bouadma; Nathalie Gault; Bruno Mourvillier; Eric Mariotte; Sarah Chemam; Laurent Massias; Emmanuelle Papy; Florence Tubach; Michel Wolff; Romain Sonneville
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Higher versus standard amikacin single dose in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sabrina De Winter; Joost Wauters; Wouter Meersseman; Jan Verhaegen; Eric Van Wijngaerden; Willy Peetermans; Pieter Annaert; Sandra Verelst; Isabel Spriet
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  Pharmacokinetics of a loading dose of amikacin in septic patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Fabio Silvio Taccone; Daniel de Backer; Pierre-François Laterre; Herbert Spapen; Thierry Dugernier; Isabelle Delattre; Pierre Wallemacq; Jean-Louis Vincent; Frédérique Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  Population pharmacokinetic modeling and optimal sampling strategy for Bayesian estimation of amikacin exposure in critically ill septic patients.

Authors:  Isabelle K Delattre; Flora T Musuamba; Joakim Nyberg; Fabio S Taccone; Pierre-François Laterre; Roger K Verbeeck; Frédérique Jacobs; Pierre E Wallemacq
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  Population pharmacokinetics of single-dose amikacin in critically ill patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  C Burdet; O Pajot; C Couffignal; L Armand-Lefèvre; A Foucrier; C Laouénan; M Wolff; L Massias; F Mentré
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Are Standard Dosing Regimens of Ceftriaxone Adapted for Critically Ill Patients with Augmented Creatinine Clearance?

Authors:  Julien Ollivier; Cédric Carrié; Nicolas d'Houdain; Sarah Djabarouti; Laurent Petit; Fabien Xuereb; Rachel Legeron; Matthieu Biais; Dominique Breilh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration.

Authors:  R D Moore; P S Lietman; C R Smith
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Effects of blood loss and fluid volume replacement on serum and tissue gentamicin concentrations during colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Sophia L Markantonis; Georgia Kostopanagiotou; Dimitris Panidis; Vassilios Smirniotis; Dionisios Voros
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  A population approach to the forecasting of amikacin plasma and urinary levels using a prescribed dosage regimen.

Authors:  P Joubert; F Bressolle; A Gouby; P Y Douçot; G Saissi; R Gomeni
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.569

10.  Impact of a high loading dose of amikacin in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Authors:  Nicolas Allou; Astrid Bouteau; Jérôme Allyn; Aurélie Snauwaert; Dorothée Valance; Julien Jabot; Bruno Bouchet; Richard Galliot; Laure Corradi; Philippe Montravers; Pascal Augustin
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 6.925

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Are Antibiotics Appropriately Dosed in Critically Ill Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance? A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Sistanizad; Rezvan Hassanpour; Elham Pourheidar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.149

Review 2.  Aminoglycosides in the Intensive Care Unit: What Is New in Population PK Modeling?

Authors:  Alexandre Duong; Chantale Simard; Yi Le Wang; David Williamson; Amélie Marsot
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29

3.  Evaluation of amikacin dosing schedule in critically ill elderly patients with different stages of renal dysfunction.

Authors:  Saeideh Ghaffari; Ali Mohammad Hadi; Farhad Najmeddin; Bita Shahrami; Mohammad-Reza Rouini; Atabak Najafi; Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2021-09-29

Review 4.  Prevalence and Risk Factors of Augmented Renal Clearance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fatma Hefny; Anna Stuart; Janice Y Kung; Sherif Hanafy Mahmoud
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 6.321

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.