| Literature DB >> 31480149 |
Wei Zhang1, Min Yang1, Yuanlang Wang1, Xudong Wu1, Xiaodong Zhang1, Yueyun Ding1, Zongjun Yin1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Wannan Black pig is a typical Chinese indigenous, disease-resistant pig breed with high fertility, and a crude-feed tolerance that has been bred by artificial selection in the south of Anhui province for a long time. However, genome variation, genetic relationships with other pig breeds, and domestication, remain poorly understood. Here, we focus on elucidating the genetic characteristics of the Wannan Black pig and identifying selection signatures during domestication and breeding.Entities:
Keywords: Genome Variation; Porcine Industry; Selection Signature; Wannan Black Pig
Year: 2019 PMID: 31480149 PMCID: PMC7206397 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.19.0289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Figure 1Geographic origin of the 19 analyzed pig breeds, including Europe and America (n = 5; green circles), Africa and Sus (n = 4; blue circle), Asia (n = 10; red circles).
Figure 2The Wannan Black pig.
Summary statistics of whole-genome sequencing
| ID | Gender | Raw data (G) | Clean data (G) | Clean reads (M) | Reads mapped (%) | Coverage depth | Coverage at least 1 or 4× (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHJ3 | M | 21.86 | 21.75 | 72,511,844 | 83.44 | 8.22 | 98.59 or 89.30 |
| WHJ23 | F | 25.38 | 25.25 | 84,182,214 | 85.66 | 9.54 | 98.47 or 93.95 |
| WHJ5 | M | 26.64 | 26.51 | 88,379,210 | 84.84 | 10.02 | 98.89 or 94.23 |
| WHJ4 | M | 26.86 | 26.61 | 88,695,743 | 83.19 | 10.10 | 98.40 or 89.83 |
| WHJ6 | M | 25.25 | 25.13 | 83,773,870 | 84.43 | 9.50 | 98.80 or 93.18 |
| WHJ29 | F | 24.67 | 24.52 | 81,746,276 | 84.97 | 9.28 | 98.30 or 91.54 |
| WHJ22 | F | 24.23 | 24.10 | 80,334,486 | 85.41 | 9.11 | 98.52 or 92.99 |
| WHJ21 | F | 19.93 | 19.80 | 66,003,507 | 84.60 | 7.50 | 95.73 or 75.74 |
| WHJ24 | F | 25.54 | 25.36 | 84,541,351 | 85.09 | 9.61 | 98.24 or 90.27 |
| WHJ1 | M | 21.43 | 21.32 | 71,059,903 | 84.51 | 8.06 | 96.33 or 78.76 |
| WHJ18 | F | 20.21 | 20.09 | 66,954,296 | 84.94 | 7.60 | 95.82 or 76.39 |
| WHJ11 | M | 30.20 | 30.01 | 100,031,210 | 84.17 | 11.36 | 98.88 or 94.61 |
| WHJ20 | F | 26.46 | 26.34 | 87,800,323 | 85.25 | 9.95 | 98.54 or 94.59 |
| WHJ19 | F | 18.87 | 18.77 | 62,584,469 | 85.47 | 7.10 | 95.16 or 73.75 |
| WHJ8 | M | 30.09 | 29.96 | 99,860,832 | 84.39 | 11.32 | 98.94 or 95.69 |
| WHJ12 | M | 26.00 | 25.82 | 86,059,643 | 84.64 | 9.78 | 98.30 or 89.29 |
| WHJ16 | M | 30.27 | 30.13 | 100,431,981 | 84.28 | 11.38 | 98.98 or 95.83 |
| WHJ27 | F | 22.75 | 22.59 | 75,304,463 | 85.47 | 8.56 | 97.86 or 86.43 |
| S17 | M | 26.99 | 26.89 | 89,634,691 | 84.46 | 10.15 | 98.93 or 94.44 |
| WHJ28 | F | 27.89 | 27.80 | 92,660,286 | 85.66 | 10.49 | 98.63 or 95.35 |
Summary of identified single nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions
| Variant type | No. of variants |
|---|---|
| SNV | 21,316,754 |
| Intergenic | 12,722,683 |
| Intragenic | 8,347,223 |
| Downstream | 124,895 |
| Upstream | 121,953 |
| Splicing site | 1198 |
| 5′ UTR | 44,897 |
| 3′ UTR | 198,836 |
| Intron | 7,892,061 |
| Coding domain | 210,231 |
| Synonymous | 144,815 |
| Non-synonymous | 64,671 |
| InDel | 5,067,206 |
| Intergenic | 3,014,421 |
| Intragenic | 1,989,666 |
| Downstream | 32,210 |
| Upstream | 30,909 |
| Splicing site | 3840 |
| 5′ UTR | 10,002 |
| 3′ UTR | 50,007 |
| Intron | 1,912,051 |
| Coding domain | 13,766 |
| Frameshift deletion | 3,855 |
| Frameshift insertion | 6,447 |
| Non-frameshift deletion | 1,520 |
| Non-frameshift insertion | 1,641 |
SNVs, single nucleotide variants; InDels, insertions/deletions; UTR, untranslated region.
Figure 3Population genetic structure of pig populations. (A) Neighbor-joining tree constructed from single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) data among 19 subspecies. (B) Principle component analysis plot of pig populations. Different colors represent different subspecies. (C) Cross-validation errors for diverse k values. (D) Population structure of study population. The length of different colors represents proportions of ancestry from ancestral populations; breed names are indicated on the left.
Figure 4Distribution of FST values and π ratios calculated in 100 kb windows with 10 kb steps. (A) Distribution of FST values among autosome chromosomes. The red line represents the 0.01 level, and the blue line represents the 0.05 level. (B) Distribution of π ratios among autosomal chromosomes. (C) Intersection of the two methods used to identify high-quality selection regions. Data points located to the right of vertical dashed line (corresponding to the 5% right tails of the empirical θπ ratio distribution), and above the horizontal dashed line (the 5% right tail of the empirical FST distribution) were identified as selected regions for Wannan black pig (red points).
Figure 5Results of the gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) analyses for the genes harbored in the selection regions. (A) GO terms of the identified genes. (B) Top 20 enrichment pathways.