Thibaut Reichert1, Nicolas Fakhry2, Jean-Pierre Lavieille2, Vincent Amodru3, Frédéric Sebag4, Pauline Romanet5, Anderson Loundou6, Frédéric Castinetti3, Karel Pacak7, Marion Montava2, David Taïeb1. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, CERIMED, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. 2. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France. 3. Department of Endocrinology, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. 4. Department of Endocrine Surgery, Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. 5. Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Conception Hospital & CNRS, CRN2M UMR 7286, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. 6. Department of Public Health, EA3279 Self-perceived Health Assessment Research Unit, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. 7. Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Nuclear imaging findings by virtue of phenotyping disease heavily depend on genetic background, metabolites, cell membrane specific targets and signalling pathways. PPGL related to succinate dehydrogenase subunits mutations (SDHx mutations) are less differentiated than other subgroups and therefore may lack to concentrate 18 F-FDOPA, a precursor of catecholamines biosynthesis. However, this 18 F-FDOPA negative phenotype has been reported mostly in SDHx-PPGL of sympathetic origin, suggesting that both genotype status and location (from sympathetic vs parasympathetic paraganglia; adrenal vs extra-adrenal) could influence 18 F-FDOPA uptake. The aim of this study was to test if SDHx drives 18 F-FDOPA uptake in presence of normal epinephrine/norepinephrine concentrations. DESIGN: Retrospective study PATIENTS: A cohort of 86 head and neck PPGL patients (including three metastatic) with normal metanephrines underwent 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT. The relationships between 18 F-FDOPA uptake and tumour genotype were evaluated. RESULTS: In nonmetastatic HNPGL (50 non-SDHx/33 SDHx), no significant difference was observed between these two groups for SUVmax (P = .256), SUVmean (P = .188), MTV 42% (P = .596) and total lesion uptake (P = .144). Metastatic HNPGL also had high elevated uptake values. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SDH deficiency or metastatic behaviour have no influence on 18 F-FDOPA uptake in HNPGL probably due to their very-well differentiation status, even at metastatic stage. The potential prognosticator value of 18 F-FDOPA uptake would need to be further explored in the setting of metastatic PPGL of sympathetic origin.
OBJECTIVES: Nuclear imaging findings by virtue of phenotyping disease heavily depend on genetic background, metabolites, cell membrane specific targets and signalling pathways. PPGL related to succinate dehydrogenase subunits mutations (SDHx mutations) are less differentiated than other subgroups and therefore may lack to concentrate 18 F-FDOPA, a precursor of catecholamines biosynthesis. However, this 18 F-FDOPA negative phenotype has been reported mostly in SDHx-PPGL of sympathetic origin, suggesting that both genotype status and location (from sympathetic vs parasympathetic paraganglia; adrenal vs extra-adrenal) could influence 18 F-FDOPA uptake. The aim of this study was to test if SDHx drives 18 F-FDOPA uptake in presence of normal epinephrine/norepinephrine concentrations. DESIGN: Retrospective study PATIENTS: A cohort of 86 head and neck PPGL patients (including three metastatic) with normal metanephrines underwent 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT. The relationships between 18 F-FDOPA uptake and tumour genotype were evaluated. RESULTS: In nonmetastatic HNPGL (50 non-SDHx/33 SDHx), no significant difference was observed between these two groups for SUVmax (P = .256), SUVmean (P = .188), MTV 42% (P = .596) and total lesion uptake (P = .144). Metastatic HNPGL also had high elevated uptake values. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SDH deficiency or metastatic behaviour have no influence on 18 F-FDOPA uptake in HNPGL probably due to their very-well differentiation status, even at metastatic stage. The potential prognosticator value of 18 F-FDOPA uptake would need to be further explored in the setting of metastatic PPGL of sympathetic origin.
Authors: Jay S Fonte; Jeremyjones F Robles; Clara C Chen; James Reynolds; Millie Whatley; Alexander Ling; Leilani B Mercado-Asis; Karen T Adams; Victoria Martucci; Tito Fojo; Karel Pacak Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Ingo Janssen; Elise M Blanchet; Karen Adams; Clara C Chen; Corina M Millo; Peter Herscovitch; David Taieb; Electron Kebebew; Hendrik Lehnert; Antonio T Fojo; Karel Pacak Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kathryn S King; Clara C Chen; Dimitrios K Alexopoulos; Millie A Whatley; James C Reynolds; Nicholas Patronas; Alexander Ling; Karen T Adams; Paraskevi Xekouki; Howard Lando; Constantine A Stratakis; Karel Pacak Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Vincent Amodru; Pauline Romanet; Ugo Scemama; Marion Montava; Nicolas Fakhry; Frédéric Sebag; Frédéric Castinetti; Jean-Pierre Lavieille; Anderson Loundou; Arthur Varoquaux; Anne Barlier; Karel Pacak; David Taïeb Journal: Head Neck Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Chloé C Feral; Floriane S Tissot; Lionel Tosello; Nicolas Fakhry; Fréderic Sebag; Karel Pacak; David Taïeb Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Henri J L M Timmers; Clara C Chen; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Millie Whatley; Alexander Ling; Graeme Eisenhofer; Kathryn S King; Jyotsna U Rao; Robert A Wesley; Karen T Adams; Karel Pacak Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 13.506