Literature DB >> 12968085

Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation on stroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation.

Elaine M Hylek1, Alan S Go, Yuchiao Chang, Nancy G Jensvold, Lori E Henault, Joe V Selby, Daniel E Singer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation is greatly reduced by oral anticoagulation, with the full effect seen at international normalized ratio (INR) values of 2.0 or greater. The effect of the intensity of oral anticoagulation on the severity of atrial fibrillation-related stroke is not known but is central to the choice of the target INR.
METHODS: We studied incident ischemic strokes in a cohort of 13,559 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Strokes were identified through hospitalization data bases and validated on the basis of medical records, which also provided information on the use of warfarin or aspirin, the INR at admission, and coexisting illnesses. The severity of stroke was graded according to a modified Rankin scale. Thirty-day mortality was ascertained from hospitalization and mortality files.
RESULTS: Of 596 ischemic strokes, 32 percent occurred during warfarin therapy, 27 percent during aspirin therapy, and 42 percent during neither type of therapy. Among patients who were taking warfarin, an INR of less than 2.0 at admission, as compared with an INR of 2.0 or greater, independently increased the odds of a severe stroke in a proportional-odds logistic-regression model (odds ratio, 1.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.4) across three severity categories and the risk of death within 30 days (hazard ratio, 3.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 10.1). An INR of 1.5 to 1.9 at admission was associated with a mortality rate similar to that for an INR of less than 1.5 (18 percent and 15 percent, respectively). The 30-day mortality rate among patients who were taking aspirin at the time of the stroke was similar to that among patients who were taking warfarin and who had an INR of less than 2.0.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation that results in an INR of 2.0 or greater reduces not only the frequency of ischemic stroke but also its severity and the risk of death from stroke. Our findings provide further evidence against the use of lower INR target levels in patients with atrial fibrillation. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12968085     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa022913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  274 in total

1.  [Persistent left atrial thrombus in atrial fibrillation under oral anticoagulation].

Authors:  B Leithäuser; F Kasch; T Broemel; J-W Park
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Balancing ischaemia and bleeding risks with novel oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Usman Baber; Ioannis Mastoris; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Implication from randomized trials of rate and rhythm controls on management of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Vincent E Hagens; Dirk J Van Veldhuisen; Harry J G M Crijns; Isabelle C van Gelder
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  Promise of factor Xa inhibition in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sana M Al-Khatib; John H Alexander; Renato D Lopes; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Manesh R Patel; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  APOE ε variants increase risk of warfarin-related intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Guido J Falcone; Farid Radmanesh; H Bart Brouwers; Thomas W K Battey; William J Devan; Valerie Valant; Miriam R Raffeld; Lennox P Chitsike; Alison M Ayres; Kristin Schwab; Joshua N Goldstein; Anand Viswanathan; Steven M Greenberg; Magdy Selim; James F Meschia; Devin L Brown; Bradford B Worrall; Scott L Silliman; David L Tirschwell; Matthew L Flaherty; Sharyl R Martini; Ranjan Deka; Alessandro Biffi; Peter Kraft; Daniel Woo; Jonathan Rosand; Christopher D Anderson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Self-management of oral anticoagulation in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (SMAAF study).

Authors:  H Völler; J Glatz; U Taborski; A Bernardo; C Dovifat; K Heidinger
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-03

7.  Structure and markers of appropriateness, quality and performance of drug treatment over a 1-year period after hospital discharge in a cohort of elderly patients with cardiovascular diseases from Germany.

Authors:  Sebastian Harder; Philipp Fischer; Markus Krause-Schäfer; Klaus Ostermann; Gottfried Helms; Helge Prinz; Mike Hahmann; Horst Baas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Potential use of NOACs in developing countries: pros and cons.

Authors:  Durga Bista; Leanne Chalmers; Luke Bereznicki; Gregory Peterson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Influence of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 on warfarin response during initiation of therapy.

Authors:  N A Limdi; H Wiener; J A Goldstein; R T Acton; T M Beasley
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Safety and efficacy of new anticoagulants in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Ron Pisters; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.