Literature DB >> 31477568

Significant Neuroanatomical Variation Among Domestic Dog Breeds.

Erin E Hecht1, Jeroen B Smaers2, William D Dunn3, Marc Kent4, Todd M Preuss5,6, David A Gutman7.   

Abstract

Humans have bred different lineages of domestic dogs for different tasks such as hunting, herding, guarding, or companionship. These behavioral differences must be the result of underlying neural differences, but surprisingly, this topic has gone largely unexplored. The current study examined whether and how selective breeding by humans has altered the gross organization of the brain in dogs. We assessed regional volumetric variation in MRI studies of 62 male and female dogs of 33 breeds. Neuroanatomical variation is plainly visible across breeds. This variation is distributed nonrandomly across the brain. A whole-brain, data-driven independent components analysis established that specific regional subnetworks covary significantly with each other. Variation in these networks is not simply the result of variation in total brain size, total body size, or skull shape. Furthermore, the anatomy of these networks correlates significantly with different behavioral specialization(s) such as sight hunting, scent hunting, guarding, and companionship. Importantly, a phylogenetic analysis revealed that most change has occurred in the terminal branches of the dog phylogenetic tree, indicating strong, recent selection in individual breeds. Together, these results establish that brain anatomy varies significantly in dogs, likely due to human-applied selection for behavior.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Dog breeds are known to vary in cognition, temperament, and behavior, but the neural origins of this variation are unknown. In an MRI-based analysis, we found that brain anatomy covaries significantly with behavioral specializations such as sight hunting, scent hunting, guarding, and companionship. Neuroanatomical variation is not simply driven by brain size, body size, or skull shape, and is focused in specific networks of regions. Nearly all of the identified variation occurs in the terminal branches of the dog phylogenetic tree, indicating strong, recent selection in individual breeds. These results indicate that through selective breeding, humans have significantly altered the brains of different lineages of domestic dogs in different ways.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; canines; dogs; evolution; morphology; selective breeding

Year:  2019        PMID: 31477568      PMCID: PMC6764193          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0303-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  39 in total

1.  Voice-Sensitive Regions in the Dog and Human Brain Are Revealed by Comparative fMRI.

Authors:  Attila Andics; Márta Gácsi; Tamás Faragó; Anna Kis; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Testing species' deviation from allometric predictions using the phylogenetic regression.

Authors:  J B Smaers; F J Rohlf
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution.

Authors:  Marguerite A Butler; Aaron A King
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Absolute brain size predicts dog breed differences in executive function.

Authors:  Daniel J Horschler; Brian Hare; Josep Call; Juliane Kaminski; Ádám Miklósi; Evan L MacLean
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Morphometrics within dog breeds are highly reproducible and dispute Rensch's rule.

Authors:  Nathan B Sutter; Dana S Mosher; Melissa M Gray; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 2.957

6.  Source-based morphometry: the use of independent component analysis to identify gray matter differences with application to schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lai Xu; Karyn M Groth; Godfrey Pearlson; David J Schretlen; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Associations between Domestic-Dog Morphology and Behaviour Scores in the Dog Mentality Assessment.

Authors:  Holly R Stone; Paul D McGreevy; Melissa J Starling; Bjorn Forkman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs.

Authors:  Márta Gácsi; Paul McGreevy; Edina Kara; Adám Miklósi
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  Permutation inference for the general linear model.

Authors:  Anderson M Winkler; Gerard R Ridgway; Matthew A Webster; Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Awake canine fMRI predicts dogs' preference for praise vs food.

Authors:  Peter F Cook; Ashley Prichard; Mark Spivak; Gregory S Berns
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  14 in total

1.  An investigation on the olfactory capabilities of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris).

Authors:  Elodie Ferrando; Christoph D Dahl
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Extensive Connections of the Canine Olfactory Pathway Revealed by Tractography and Dissection.

Authors:  Erica F Andrews; Raluca Pascalau; Alexandra Horowitz; Gillian M Lawrence; Philippa J Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Neuromorphological changes following selection for tameness and aggression in the Russian fox-farm experiment.

Authors:  Erin E Hecht; Anna V Kukekova; David A Gutman; Gregory M Acland; Todd M Preuss; Lyudmila N Trut
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modified formulas for calculation of encephalization: quotient in dogs.

Authors:  Saganuwan Alhaji Saganuwan
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2021-06-03

5.  Intensive human contact correlates with smaller brains: differential brain size reduction in cattle types.

Authors:  A M Balcarcel; K Veitschegger; M Clauss; M R Sánchez-Villagra
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Brain weight predicts yawn duration across domesticated dog breeds.

Authors:  Andrew C Gallup; Lea Moscatello; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.624

7.  Canine sense of quantity: evidence for numerical ratio-dependent activation in parietotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Lauren S Aulet; Veronica C Chiu; Ashley Prichard; Mark Spivak; Stella F Lourenco; Gregory S Berns
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 8.  Is cognition the secret to working dog success?

Authors:  Brian Hare; Morgan Ferrans
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Comparative Brain Imaging Reveals Analogous and Divergent Patterns of Species and Face Sensitivity in Humans and Dogs.

Authors:  Nóra Bunford; Raúl Hernández-Pérez; Eszter Borbála Farkas; Laura V Cuaya; Dóra Szabó; Ádám György Szabó; Márta Gácsi; Ádám Miklósi; Attila Andics
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Time-resolved classification of dog brain signals reveals early processing of faces, species and emotion.

Authors:  Miiamaaria V Kujala; Jukka-Pekka Kauppi; Heini Törnqvist; Liisa Helle; Outi Vainio; Jan Kujala; Lauri Parkkonen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.