Literature DB >> 19020935

Morphometrics within dog breeds are highly reproducible and dispute Rensch's rule.

Nathan B Sutter1, Dana S Mosher, Melissa M Gray, Elaine A Ostrander.   

Abstract

Using 27 body measurements, we have identified 13 breed-defining metrics for 109 of 159 domestic dog breeds, most of which are recognized by the American Kennel Club (AKC). The data set included 1,155 dogs at least 1 year old (average 5.4 years), and for 53 breed populations, complete measurement data were collected from at least three males and three females. We demonstrate, first, that AKC breed standards are rigorously adhered to for most domestic breeds with little variation observed within breeds. Second, Rensch's rule, which describes a scaling among taxa such that sexual dimorphism is greater among larger species if males are the larger sex, with less pronounced differences in male versus female body size in smaller species, is not maintained in domestic dog breeds because the proportional size difference between males and females of small and large breeds is essentially the same. Finally, principal components (PCs) analysis describes both the overall body size (PC1) and the shape (length versus width) of the skeleton (PC2). That the integrity of the data set is sufficiently rich to discern PCs has strong implications for mapping studies, suggesting that individual measurements may not be needed for genetic studies of morphologic traits, particularly in the case of breed-defining traits that are typically under strong selection. Rather, phenotypes derived from data sets such as these, collected at a fraction of the effort and cost, may be used to direct whole-genome association studies aimed at understanding the genetic basis of fixed morphologic phenotypes defining distinct dog breeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19020935      PMCID: PMC2748280          DOI: 10.1007/s00335-008-9153-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  10 in total

Review 1.  Unleashing the canine genome.

Authors:  E A Ostrander; L Kruglyak
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Selective sweep mapping of genes with large phenotypic effects.

Authors:  John P Pollinger; Carlos D Bustamante; Adi Fledel-Alon; Sheila Schmutz; Melissa M Gray; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Interaction between the X chromosome and an autosome regulates size sexual dimorphism in Portuguese Water Dogs.

Authors:  Kevin Chase; David R Carrier; Frederick R Adler; Elaine A Ostrander; Karl G Lark
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Breed relationships facilitate fine-mapping studies: a 7.8-kb deletion cosegregates with Collie eye anomaly across multiple dog breeds.

Authors:  Heidi G Parker; Anna V Kukekova; Dayna T Akey; Orly Goldstein; Ewen F Kirkness; Kathleen C Baysac; Dana S Mosher; Gustavo D Aguirre; Gregory M Acland; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based association mapping of dog stereotypes.

Authors:  Paul Jones; Kevin Chase; Alan Martin; Pluis Davern; Elaine A Ostrander; Karl G Lark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic basis for systems of skeletal quantitative traits: principal component analysis of the canid skeleton.

Authors:  Kevin Chase; David R Carrier; Frederick R Adler; Tyler Jarvik; Elaine A Ostrander; Travis D Lorentzen; Karl G Lark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog.

Authors:  Heidi G Parker; Lisa V Kim; Nathan B Sutter; Scott Carlson; Travis D Lorentzen; Tiffany B Malek; Gary S Johnson; Hawkins B DeFrance; Elaine A Ostrander; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Efficient mapping of mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association.

Authors:  Elinor K Karlsson; Izabella Baranowska; Claire M Wade; Nicolette H C Salmon Hillbertz; Michael C Zody; Nathan Anderson; Tara M Biagi; Nick Patterson; Gerli Rosengren Pielberg; Edward J Kulbokas; Kenine E Comstock; Evan T Keller; Jill P Mesirov; Henrik von Euler; Olle Kämpe; Ake Hedhammar; Eric S Lander; Göran Andersson; Leif Andersson; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  A single IGF1 allele is a major determinant of small size in dogs.

Authors:  Nathan B Sutter; Carlos D Bustamante; Kevin Chase; Melissa M Gray; Keyan Zhao; Lan Zhu; Badri Padhukasahasram; Eric Karlins; Sean Davis; Paul G Jones; Pascale Quignon; Gary S Johnson; Heidi G Parker; Neale Fretwell; Dana S Mosher; Dennis F Lawler; Ebenezer Satyaraj; Magnus Nordborg; K Gordon Lark; Robert K Wayne; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Limb morphology of domestic and wild canids: the influence of development on morphologic change.

Authors:  R K Wayne
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.804

  10 in total
  26 in total

1.  Significant Neuroanatomical Variation Among Domestic Dog Breeds.

Authors:  Erin E Hecht; Jeroen B Smaers; William D Dunn; Marc Kent; Todd M Preuss; David A Gutman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Andrew meets Rensch: sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch's rule in Andrew's toad (Bufo andrewsi).

Authors:  Wen Bo Liao; Wen Chao Liu; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Two length variants of the microsatellite FH2295 as markers for body size of female Portuguese water dogs.

Authors:  S C Bérubé; P R Johnsson; N Bunimov; C Boivin; O Laneuville
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of a low-technology system to obtain morphological and mobility trial measurements in dogs and investigation of potential predictors of canine mobility.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Morgan; Johanna C Heseltine; Gwendolyn J Levine; Daniel E L Promislow; Kate E Creevy
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.156

5.  The insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) contributes to reduced size in dogs.

Authors:  Barbara C Hoopes; Maud Rimbault; David Liebers; Elaine A Ostrander; Nathan B Sutter
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.957

6.  A simple genetic architecture underlies morphological variation in dogs.

Authors:  Adam R Boyko; Pascale Quignon; Lin Li; Jeffrey J Schoenebeck; Jeremiah D Degenhardt; Kirk E Lohmueller; Keyan Zhao; Abra Brisbin; Heidi G Parker; Bridgett M vonHoldt; Michele Cargill; Adam Auton; Andy Reynolds; Abdel G Elkahloun; Marta Castelhano; Dana S Mosher; Nathan B Sutter; Gary S Johnson; John Novembre; Melissa J Hubisz; Adam Siepel; Robert K Wayne; Carlos D Bustamante; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Fine mapping a locus controlling leg morphology in the domestic dog.

Authors:  P Quignon; J J Schoenebeck; K Chase; H G Parker; D S Mosher; G S Johnson; K G Lark; E A Ostrander
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2009-08-28

8.  Impact of facial conformation on canine health: corneal ulceration.

Authors:  Rowena M A Packer; Anke Hendricks; Charlotte C Burn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Allometry of sexual size dimorphism in domestic dog.

Authors:  Daniel Frynta; Jana Baudyšová; Petra Hradcová; Kateřina Faltusová; Lukáš Kratochvíl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Origins of the domestic dog and the rich potential for gene mapping.

Authors:  Jeremy R Shearman; Alan N Wilton
Journal:  Genet Res Int       Date:  2011-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.