Literature DB >> 31476612

Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.

Tómas Kristjánsson1, Ian M Thornton2, Andrey Chetverikov3, Árni Kristjánsson4.   

Abstract

Visual search tasks play a key role in theories of visual attention. But single-target search tasks may provide only a snapshot of attentional orienting. Foraging tasks with multiple targets of different types arguably provide a closer analogy to everyday attentional processing. Set-size effects have in the literature formed the basis for inferring how attention operates during visual search. We therefore measured the effects of absolute set-size (constant target-distractor ratio) and relative set-size (constant set-size but target-distractor ratio varies) on foraging patterns during "feature" foraging (targets differed from distractors on a single feature) and "conjunction" foraging (targets differed from distractors on a combination of two features). Patterns of runs of same target-type selection were similar regardless of whether absolute or relative set-size varied: long sequential runs during conjunction foraging but rapid switching between target types during feature foraging. But although foraging strategies differed between feature and conjunction foraging, surprisingly, intertarget times throughout foraging trials did not differ much between the conditions. Typical response time by set-size patterns for single-target visual search tasks were only observed for the last target during foraging. Furthermore, the foraging patterns within trials involved several distinct phases, that may serve as markers of particular attentional operations. Foraging tasks provide a remarkably intricate picture of attentional selection, far more detailed than traditional single-target visual search tasks, and well-known theories of visual attention have difficulty accounting for key aspects of the observed foraging patterns. Finally, we discuss how theoretical conceptions of attention could be modified to account for these effects.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Set-size effects; Visual attention; Visual foraging; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31476612     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  8 in total

Review 1.  Foraging behavior in visual search: A review of theoretical and mathematical models in humans and animals.

Authors:  Marcos Bella-Fernández; Manuel Suero Suñé; Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-21

2.  The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging?

Authors:  Ian M Thornton; Jérôme Tagu; Sunčica Zdravković; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Target value and prevalence influence visual foraging in younger and older age.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

5.  Eating disorder symptoms and foraging for food related items.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Auður Helgadóttir; Tómas Kristjánsson
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2021-02-10

6.  Keeping it real: Looking beyond capacity limits in visual cognition.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Dejan Draschkow
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  How do we measure attention? Using factor analysis to establish construct validity of neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Melissa Treviño; Xiaoshu Zhu; Yi Yi Lu; Luke S Scheuer; Eliza Passell; Grace C Huang; Laura T Germine; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-07-22

8.  Looking ahead: When do you find the next item in foraging visual search?

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; Abla Alaoui-Soce; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.