Literature DB >> 31474386

Implementation and upscaling of midwifery continuity of care: The experience of midwives and obstetricians.

Cathy Styles1, Lauren Kearney2, Kendall George3.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: Despite high quality evidence supporting midwifery continuity of care, access to this model is limited in many parts of Australia and internationally.
BACKGROUND: The models of care provided to women have a strong influence on their perinatal experience and clinical outcomes. Midwifery Continuity of Care (CoC) is arguably the most significant factor in enhancing women's clinical outcomes during child-bearing and facilitating a positive childbirth experience. Health system change is required, yet little literature has detailed the actualisation of this in the context of upscaling midwifery CoC. RESEARCH QUESTION/AIM: This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of midwifery and obstetric staff during the implementation and upscaling of midwifery CoC within a regional hospital and health service in coastal Queensland, Australia.
METHODS: A single-site, qualitative enquiry. Obstetricians and midwives participated in semi-structured interviews or focus groups at two-time points: within 2 months of introduction of the CoC service (obstetricians n=6; midwives n=15); and 2-years after implementation (obstetricians n=5; midwives n=17). Data were analysed thematically.
FINDINGS: Four key themes and several categories were generated from the data: hopes and expectations; clinical and practice changes; organisational and structural change; and, future directions. DISCUSSION: Organisational culture, structural change, communication processes and collaborative relationships can be used to inform future scale-up and sustain midwifery caseload care. Specifically, communication, inter-disciplinary collegial relationships, and managerial support are crucial to the sustainability and ultimate upscaling of caseload midwifery care.
CONCLUSION: System change is challenging, but in order to improve access to midwifery CoC is necessary.
Copyright © 2019 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuity of care; Midwife; Models of care; Organizational change; Qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31474386     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  4 in total

1.  The effect of continuous midwifery services on the delivery mode, labor progress, and nursing satisfaction of primiparas during natural deliveries.

Authors:  Yali Zhang; Kun Xu; Li Gong; Yunjia Sun; Fenfen Ren
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  The midwives' experiences of the use of obstetric triage and obstetric triage tool during labour in Bojanala district.

Authors:  Kagiso P Tukisi; Annie Temane; Anna Nolte
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 3.  Enhancing interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education in women's health.

Authors:  Laura Baecher-Lind; Angela C Fleming; Rashmi Bhargava; Susan M Cox; Elise N Everett; David A Forstein; Shireen Madani Sims; Helen K Morgan; Christopher M Morosky; Celeste S Royce; Tammy S Sonn; Jill M Sutton; Scott C Graziano
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2022-12

4.  Exploration of Telemidwifery: An Initiation of Application Menu in Indonesia.

Authors:  Alyxia Gita Stellata; Fedri Ruluwedrata Rinawan; Gatot Nyarumenteng Adhipurnawan Winarno; Ari Indra Susanti; Wanda Gusdya Purnama
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.614

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.