Literature DB >> 31474329

Relation of Magnetic Resonance Elastography to Fontan Failure and Portal Hypertension.

Tarek Alsaied1, Mathias Possner2, Adam M Lubert2, Andrew T Trout3, Cassandra Szugye2, Joseph J Palermo4, Angela Lorts2, Bryan H Goldstein2, Gruschen R Veldtman5, Nadeem Anwar6, Johnathan R Dillman3.   

Abstract

Fontan associated liver disease is associated with morbidity and mortality in palliated single-ventricle congenital heart disease patients. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) provides a quantitative assessment of liver stiffness in Fontan patients. We hypothesized that MRE liver stiffness correlates with liver enzymes, hemodynamics, portal hypertension, and Fontan failure (FF). All adult Fontan patients who had MRE between 2011 and 2018 were included. Radiologic portal hypertension was defined as splenomegaly, ascites, and/or varices. FF was defined as death, transplantation, or heart failure symptoms requiring escalation of diuretics. Seventy patients with a median age of 24.7 years and a median follow-up from MRE of 3.9 years were included. The median liver stiffness was 4.3 kPa (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.8 to 5.0 kPa). There was a weak, positive correlation between liver stiffness and Fontan pathway pressure (r = 0.34, p = 0.03). There was a moderate negative correlation of liver stiffness with ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.52, p = 0.03). Liver stiffness was weakly positively correlated with liver transaminases and gamma glutamyl transferase. Patients with portal hypertension had higher liver stiffness compared to patients without (5.2 ± 1.3 vs 4.2 ± 0.8 kPa, p = 0.03). At MRE or during follow-up, 13 patients (19%) met definition of FF and had significantly higher liver stiffness compared to patients without FF (5.1 [IQR: 4.3 to 6.3] vs 4.2 [IQR: 3.7 to 4.7] kPa, p = 0.01). Liver stiffness above 4.5 kPa differentiated FF with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 77%. In conclusion, elevated MRE-derived liver stiffness is associated with worse hemodynamics, liver enzymes and clinical outcomes in Fontan patients. This measure may serve as a global imaging biomarker of Fontan health.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31474329     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Portosystemic shunt with hyperammonemia and high cardiac output as a complication after Fontan surgery.

Authors:  Kiyotaka Takefuta; Hideaki Senzaki; Atsuya Shimabukuro; Masahiro Nishibata; Seiichi Sato; Mami Nakayashiro
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2020-11-07

Review 2.  MR elastography of liver: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Ilkay S Idilman; Jiahui Li; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 3.  Imaging of Fontan-associated liver disease.

Authors:  Jonathan R Dillman; Andrew T Trout; Tarek Alsaied; Anita Gupta; Adam M Lubert
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-08-18

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: everything you need to know to get started.

Authors:  Kay M Pepin; Christopher L Welle; Flavius F Guglielmo; Jonathan R Dillman; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-11-01

5.  Myocardial fibrosis, diastolic dysfunction and elevated liver stiffness in the Fontan circulation.

Authors:  Tarek Alsaied; Ryan A Moore; Sean M Lang; Vien Truong; Adam M Lubert; Gruschen R Veldtman; Konstantin Averin; Jonathan R Dillman; Andrew T Trout; Wojciech Mazur; Michael D Taylor; Quan He; David Ls Morales; Andrew N Redington; Bryan H Goldstein
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.