Aurora Pop-Vicas1,2, Nasia Safdar3. 1. Division of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. popvicas@medicine.wisc.edu. 2. Division of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, 1685 Highland Avenue, 5th floor, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. popvicas@medicine.wisc.edu. 3. Division of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To identify the most common strategies currently used for S. aureus decolonization and surgical site infection (SSI) prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: Pre-operative colonization with Staphylococcus aureus increases SSI risk. Screening and decolonization with intra-nasal mupirocin and pre-operative chlorhexidine bathing remains the most common and effective strategy, especially for orthopedic and cardiovascular surgery. Intra-nasal povidone-iodine immediately before surgery appears effective in preliminary studies, is less expensive, and may be easier to implement in the clinical setting. Future well-designed clinical research studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness in SSI prevention. Intra-nasal alcohol-based antisepsis and photodynamic therapy are promising strategies that deserve further study before they can be clinically applied to SSI prevention. Decolonization with intra-nasal mupirocin or povidone-iodine, in addition to pre-operative chlorhexidine bathing, is an important SSI prevention strategy. Future studies should address optimal dosing, timing, and number of applications for each regimen.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To identify the most common strategies currently used for S. aureus decolonization and surgical site infection (SSI) prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: Pre-operative colonization with Staphylococcus aureus increases SSI risk. Screening and decolonization with intra-nasal mupirocin and pre-operative chlorhexidine bathing remains the most common and effective strategy, especially for orthopedic and cardiovascular surgery. Intra-nasal povidone-iodine immediately before surgery appears effective in preliminary studies, is less expensive, and may be easier to implement in the clinical setting. Future well-designed clinical research studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness in SSI prevention. Intra-nasal alcohol-based antisepsis and photodynamic therapy are promising strategies that deserve further study before they can be clinically applied to SSI prevention. Decolonization with intra-nasal mupirocin or povidone-iodine, in addition to pre-operative chlorhexidine bathing, is an important SSI prevention strategy. Future studies should address optimal dosing, timing, and number of applications for each regimen.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mupirocin; Pre-operative decolonization; Staphylococcus aureus; Surgical site infection
Authors: Nalini Rao; Barbara A Cannella; Lawrence S Crossett; Adolph J Yates; Richard L McGough; Cindy W Hamilton Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2011-04-19 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Vismay Thakkar; George M Ghobrial; Christopher M Maulucci; Saurabh Singhal; Srinivas K Prasad; James S Harrop; Alexander R Vaccaro; Caleb Behrend; Ashwini D Sharan; Jack Jallo Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Amanda L Walsh; Adam C Fields; James D Dieterich; Darwin D Chen; Michael J Bronson; Calin S Moucha Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Dawn M Sievert; Philip Ricks; Jonathan R Edwards; Amy Schneider; Jean Patel; Arjun Srinivasan; Alex Kallen; Brandi Limbago; Scott Fridkin Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Shelley S Magill; Jonathan R Edwards; Wendy Bamberg; Zintars G Beldavs; Ghinwa Dumyati; Marion A Kainer; Ruth Lynfield; Meghan Maloney; Laura McAllister-Hollod; Joelle Nadle; Susan M Ray; Deborah L Thompson; Lucy E Wilson; Scott K Fridkin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Parjam S Zolfaghari; Samantha Packer; Mervyn Singer; Sean P Nair; Jon Bennett; Cale Street; Michael Wilson Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 3.605