Literature DB >> 31473060

Comparison of Contact Kinematics in Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty at Long-Term Follow-Up.

Jordan S Broberg1, Silvio Ndoja2, Steven J MacDonald2, Brent A Lanting2, Matthew G Teeter3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the superiority of posterior-stabilizing (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. Substantial work has made comparisons between PS and CR TKA at follow-ups of less than 5 years. It was the goal of the present study to compare the kinematics at greater than 5 years postoperatively between CR and PS TKA, with a secondary goal of comparing patient function.
METHODS: A total of 42 knees were investigated, with equal representation in the PS and CR TKA groups. Patients underwent radiostereometric analysis imaging at 0°, 20°, 40°, 60° 80°, and 100° of flexion. Contact position, magnitude of excursion, and condylar separation on each condyle were measured. A Timed-Up-and-Go functional test was also performed by patients, with the total test time being measured. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome scores were also collected.
RESULTS: There were differences in contact position on both the medial and lateral condyles at multiple angles of flexion (P < .05). There was no difference (P = .89) in medial excursion; however, PS TKA had greater lateral excursion than CR TKA (P < .01). No difference (P > .99) was found in frequency of condylar separation. PS TKA was associated with faster (P = .03) total Timed-Up-and-Go test times. There were no differences in clinical outcome scores between the groups preoperatively or postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: We found kinematic and functional differences that favor PS TKA. Our results suggest posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency in CR TKA, indicating that perhaps the cam/post systems in PS TKA better maintain knee kinematics and function long term.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cruciate-retaining; kinematics; patient function; posterior-stabilized; radiostereometric analysis; total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 31473060     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  Octogenarians Are the New Sexagenarians: Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Inferior to Posterior-Stabilized Arthroplasty in Octogenarian Patients.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Prem Haridas Menon; Abhijeet Salunke; Ilaria Mariani; Giovanni Palminteri; Giuseppe Basile; Nicola Ursino; Laura Mangiavini; Michael Hantes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  No difference in PROMs between robotic-assisted CR versus PS total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jarod A Richards; Mark D Williams; Neil A Gupta; Joseph M Kitchen; John E Whitaker; Langan S Smith; Arthur L Malkani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-01-08

3.  Impact of femoro-tibial size combinations and TKA design on kinematics.

Authors:  Ingrid Dupraz; Christoph Thorwächter; Thomas M Grupp; Florian Hammerschmid; Matthias Woiczinski; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller; Arnd Steinbrück
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  To sacrifice or replace the posterior cruciate ligament in primary total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  O Şahap Atik; Sualp Turan
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2020
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.