| Literature DB >> 31472356 |
Mirjana Drinić1, Adriane Raninger2, Andrea Zraunig2, Florian Astelbauer1, David Leitsch1, Andreas Obwaller3, Julia Walochnik1, Harald Greger2, Michael Duchene4.
Abstract
Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia duodenalis are widespread intestinal protozoan parasites which both spread via cysts that have to be ingested to infect a new host. Their environment, the small intestine for G. duodenalis and the colon for E. histolytica, contains only very limited amounts of oxygen, so both parasites generate energy by fermentation and substrate level phosphorylation rather than by oxidative phosphorylation. They both contain reducing agents able to reduce and activate nitroimidazole drugs such as metronidazole which is the gold standard drug to treat Entamoeba or Giardia infections. Although metronidazole works well in the majority of cases, it has a number of drawbacks. In animal models, the drug has carcinogenic activity, and concerns about a possible teratogenic activity remain. In addition, the treatment of G. duodenalis infections is hampered by emerging metronidazole resistance. Plant-derived drugs play a dominant role in human medicine, therefore we tested the activity of 14 isolated plant compounds belonging to seven different classes in vitro against both parasites. The tests were performed in a new setting in microtiter plates under anaerobic conditions. The compound with the highest activity was methylgerambullin, a sulphur-containing amide found in Glycosmis species of the family Rutaceae with an EC50 of 14.5 μM (6.08 μg/ml) after 24 h treatment for E. histolytica and 14.6 μM (6.14 μg/ml) for G. duodenalis. The compound was successfully synthesised in the laboratory which opens the door for the generation of new derivatives with higher activity.Entities:
Keywords: Aglafoline; Entamoeba histolytica; Giardia duodenalis; Glycosmis spp.; Methylgerambullin; Sulphur-containing amide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31472356 PMCID: PMC6722286 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2019.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist ISSN: 2211-3207 Impact factor: 4.077
Fig. 1The 14 compounds tested against E. histolytica and G. duodenalis in this study.
List of compounds tested in this study, compound class, origin from plant family and species, plant organs, references.
| Compound | Compound class | Plant family | Plant species | Plant organ | References for isolation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aglafoline | Flavagline | Meliaceae | Stembark | ||
| Dictamnine | Furoquinoline | Rutaceae | Rootbark | ||
| Iso-gamma-fagarine | Furoquinoline | Rutaceae | Leaves | ||
| Kokusagenine | Furoquinoline | Rutaceae | Rootbark | ||
| Yukocitrine | Acridone | Rutaceae | Stembark | ||
| Arborinine | Acridone | Rutaceae | Leaves | ||
| 5-Hydroxy-noracronycine | Acridone | Rutaceae | Stembark | ||
| Zanthobungeanine | Quinolinone | Rutaceae | Rootbark | ||
| Arborine | Quinazoline | Rutaceae | Leaves | ||
| Microminutine | Coumarin | Rutaceae | Leaves | ||
| Methyllacarol | Coumarin | Asteraceae | Leaves | ||
| Methyldambullin | S-amide | Rutaceae | Leaves | ||
| Sakambullin | S-amide | Rutaceae | Leaves | ||
| Methylgerambullin | S-amide | Rutaceae | Leaves |
S-amide = sulphur-containing amide.
Fig. 2Chemical synthesis of methylgerambullin from commercially available compounds.
Quick tests of the compounds against E. histolytica and G. duodenalis.
| A - Test of growth inhibition (GI) [%] of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assay time | 24 h | 48 h | ||
| Concentration | 10 μg/ml | 2.5 μg/ml | 10 μg/ml | 2.5 μg/ml |
| Aglafoline | 16.3 ± 1.9 | 11.4 ± 4.2 | 7.8 ± 15.2 | 6.7 ± 6.3 |
| Dictamnine | 6.2 ± 13.2 | −5.4 ± 12.8 | 15.7 ± 3.3 | −6.4 ± 7.2 |
| Iso-gamma-fagarine | 5.9 ± 12.8 | 27.4 ± 21.2 | 16.1 ± 3.7 | −28.7 ± 11.3 |
| Kokusagenine | 8.8 ± 2.1 | 21.4 ± 5.1 | 0 ± 8.4 | −25.8 ± 27.8 |
| Yukocitrine | 11.1 ± 15.4 | 15.8 ± 9.3 | −41.9 ± 13.7 | −21.7 ± 14.0 |
| Arborinine | 15.3 ± 12.1 | 32.4 ± 5.6 | −33.2 ± 4.3 | −57.3 ± 19.4 |
| 5-Hydroxynoracronycine | 31.1 ± 5.9 | 26.6 ± 2.2 | 26.4 ± 6.1 | −41.8 ± 4.8 |
| Zanthobungeanine | 28.7 ± 4.2 | 9.7 ± 4.7 | 2.3 ± 17.2 | −7.1 ± 7.0 |
| Arborine | 22.9 ± 9.8 | 36.6 ± 7.3 | −51.5 ± 9.5 | −34.7 ± 14.7 |
| Microminutine | 26.5 ± 2.9 | 14.5 ± 1.6 | −6.6 ± 9.7 | 13.4 ± 9.2 |
| Methyllacarol | −13.6 ± 14.5 | 2.8 ± 11.1 | −16.1 ± 13.5 | −18.9 ± 9.8 |
| Methyldambullin | 27.4 ± 12.8 | 13.9 ± 9.8 | −1.0 ± 6.0 | −24.3 ± 21.6 |
| Sakambullin | 25.9 ± 10.4 | 8.1 ± 13.5 | −13.6 ± 25.5 | −56.8 ± 9.5 |
| Methylgerambullin | 96.5 ± 2.3 | 48.2 ± 14.9 | 96.8 ± 0.3 | 30.9 ± 4.9 |
|
| ||||
| B - Test of growth inhibition (GI) [%] of | ||||
| Assay time | 24 h | 48 h | ||
| Concentration | 10 μg/ml | 2.5 μg/ml | 10 μg/ml | 2.5 μg/ml |
| Aglafoline | 62.6 ± 5.5 | 63.7 ± 2.6 | 73.9 ± 2.5 | 75.4 ± 2.8 |
| Dictamnine | 24.0 ± 9.5 | 11.8 ± 1.6 | 1.7 ± 3.5 | 0.5 ± 4.2 |
| Iso-gamma-fagarine | 36.2 ± 5.5 | 0.1 ± 3.14 | 2.7 ± 3.3 | −1.8 ± 2.2 |
| Kokusagenine | 18.4 ± 7.9 | 24.7 ± 1.4 | 36.1 ± 3.5 | 28.9 ± 2.3 |
| Yukocitrine | 7.5 ± 4.6 | 14.9 ± 9.3 | 7.7 ± 2.8 | 3.7 ± 10.1 |
| Arborinine | 17.0 ± 2.1 | 5.7 ± 3.8 | 12.2 ± 5.5 | 13.2 ± 3.6 |
| 5-Hydroxynoracronycine | −2.1 ± 14.1 | −0.1 ± 11.3 | 18.2 ± 5.4 | 16.1 ± 4.2 |
| Zanthobungeanine | 28.2 ± 7.4 | 0.1 ± 6.7 | 41.1 ± 7.8 | 40.1 ± 7.8 |
| Arborine | 27.8 ± 3.4 | 18.6 ± 4.8 | 9.1 ± 1.6 | 7.5 ± 3.7 |
| Microminutine | 21.5 ± 10.0 | 10.4 ± 7.7 | −2.9 ± 6.5 | −5.6 ± 9.6 |
| Methyllacarol | 27.9 ± 10.0 | 15.8 ± 5.3 | 19.2 ± 4.2 | 26.8 ± 13.9 |
| Methyldambullin | 54.8 ± 4.4 | 21.2 ± 11.7 | 26.4 ± 12.3 | 3.6 ± 5.0 |
| Sakambullin | 7.2 ± 2.2 | 7.1 ± 3.5 | 10.8 ± 1.9 | 0.7 ± 3.4 |
| Methylgerambullin | 96.9 ± 2.0 | 54.1 ± 12.9 | 99.5 ± 0.5 | 36.9 ± 9.3 |
The assays were carried out in triplicates in 96-well microplates in an air-tight plastic box under anaerobic conditions. The parasites were seeded at a concentration of 40,000 cells ml−1 in a volume of 300 μl. After incubation of 24 h or 48 h a sample was stained with Trypan blue and the number of the dead and living cells was counted. GI [%] (percent growth inhibition) ± standard deviation σn [%] was calculated as described in Materials and Methods.
Activity of methylgerambullin against E. histolytica (A) and methylgerambullin and aglafoline against G. duodenalis (B).
| A - Entamoeba histolytica | G [μM] | |
|---|---|---|
| Methylgerambullin | ||
| 24 h | 14.5 | 1.36 |
| 48 h | 17.5 | 1.59 |
| Control metronidazole | ||
| 24 h | 2.40 | |
| 48 h | 1.40 | |
| B - Giardia duodenalis | G [μM] | |
| Methylgerambullin | ||
| 24 h | 14.6 | 2.85 |
| 48 h | 36.6 | 6.08 |
| Aglafoline | ||
| 24 h | 17.2 | |
| 48 h | 7.71 | |
| Control metronidazole | ||
| 24 h | 3.15 | |
| 48 h | 1.93 | |
Test of methylgerambullin and metronidazole (control) against E. histolytica (A) as well as methylgerambullin, aglafoline and metronidazole (control) against G. duodenalis (B). The geometric means G [μM] of EC50 values are shown for three experiments (methylgerambullin) or two experiments (metronidazole, aglafoline), in addition the geometric standard deviations σ are given where three experiments were performed.
Fig. 3A.Entamoeba histolytica was cultivated for 24 h with different concentrations of methylgerambullin (MG) in medium with different cysteine concentrations and the number of surviving trophozoites was counted. B. The same experiment was performed for G. duodenalis.
Fig. 4Predicted structures of the sulphur-containing amides as generated by the Molinspiration Galaxy 3D Structure Generator (www.molinspiration.com).
Fig. 5Proposed reaction scheme for the reaction of methylgerambullin with cysteine.