Jiri Bartek1,2,3, Ali A Alattar4, Sanjay Dhawan5, Jun Ma5, Tomoyuki Koga5, Peter Nakaji6, Kathryn E Dusenbery7, Clark C Chen8,9. 1. Department of Medicine and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Faculty of Health Sciences, UCSD, San Diego, USA. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 6. Barrow Brain and Spine, Phoenix, AZ, USA. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 8. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. ccchen@umn.edu. 9. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, D429 Mayo Memorial Building, 420 Delaware St. S. E., MMC96, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. ccchen@umn.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There has been a resurgence of interest in brachytherapy as a treatment for glioblastoma, with several currently ongoing clinical trials. To provide a foundation for the analysis of these trials, we analyze the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to determine whether receipt of brachytherapy conveys a survival benefit independent of traditional prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 60,456 glioblastoma patients, of whom 362 underwent brachytherapy. We grouped patients based on receipt of brachytherapy and compared clinical and demographic variables between groups using Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-squared test. We assessed survival using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 16 months in patients who received brachytherapy compared to 9 months in those who did not (log-rank p < 0.001). Patients who underwent brachytherapy tended to be younger (p < 0.001), suffered from smaller tumors (< 4 cm, p < 0.001), and were more likely to have undergone gross total resection (GTR, p < 0.001). In univariable Cox models, these variables were independently associated with improved overall survival. Additionally, improved survival was associated with known receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.459, p < 0.001), external beam radiation (HR 0.447, p < 0.001), and brachytherapy (HR 0.637, p < 0.001). The association between brachytherapy and improved survival remained robust (HR 0.859, p = 0.031) in a multivariable model that adjusted for patient age, tumor size, tumor location, GTR, receipt of chemotherapy, and receipt of external beam radiation. CONCLUSION: Our SEER analysis indicates that brachytherapy is associated with improved survival in glioblastoma after controlling for age, tumor size/location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, and external beam radiation.
INTRODUCTION: There has been a resurgence of interest in brachytherapy as a treatment for glioblastoma, with several currently ongoing clinical trials. To provide a foundation for the analysis of these trials, we analyze the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to determine whether receipt of brachytherapy conveys a survival benefit independent of traditional prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 60,456 glioblastomapatients, of whom 362 underwent brachytherapy. We grouped patients based on receipt of brachytherapy and compared clinical and demographic variables between groups using Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-squared test. We assessed survival using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 16 months in patients who received brachytherapy compared to 9 months in those who did not (log-rank p < 0.001). Patients who underwent brachytherapy tended to be younger (p < 0.001), suffered from smaller tumors (< 4 cm, p < 0.001), and were more likely to have undergone gross total resection (GTR, p < 0.001). In univariable Cox models, these variables were independently associated with improved overall survival. Additionally, improved survival was associated with known receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.459, p < 0.001), external beam radiation (HR 0.447, p < 0.001), and brachytherapy (HR 0.637, p < 0.001). The association between brachytherapy and improved survival remained robust (HR 0.859, p = 0.031) in a multivariable model that adjusted for patient age, tumor size, tumor location, GTR, receipt of chemotherapy, and receipt of external beam radiation. CONCLUSION: Our SEER analysis indicates that brachytherapy is associated with improved survival in glioblastoma after controlling for age, tumor size/location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, and external beam radiation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Brachytherapy; Glioblastoma; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER); Survival
Authors: Philipp Kickingereder; Christina Hamisch; Bogdana Suchorska; Norbert Galldiks; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Roland Goldbrunner; Martin Kocher; Harald Treuer; Juergen Voges; Maximilian I Ruge Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Roel G W Verhaak; Katherine A Hoadley; Elizabeth Purdom; Victoria Wang; Yuan Qi; Matthew D Wilkerson; C Ryan Miller; Li Ding; Todd Golub; Jill P Mesirov; Gabriele Alexe; Michael Lawrence; Michael O'Kelly; Pablo Tamayo; Barbara A Weir; Stacey Gabriel; Wendy Winckler; Supriya Gupta; Lakshmi Jakkula; Heidi S Feiler; J Graeme Hodgson; C David James; Jann N Sarkaria; Cameron Brennan; Ari Kahn; Paul T Spellman; Richard K Wilson; Terence P Speed; Joe W Gray; Matthew Meyerson; Gad Getz; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: J Dawn Waters; Brent Rose; David D Gonda; Daniel J Scanderbeg; Michelle Russell; John F Alksne; Kevin Murphy; Bob S Carter; Joshua Lawson; Clark C Chen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: L E Gaspar; B J Fisher; D R Macdonald; D V LeBer; E C Halperin; S C Schold; J G Cairncross Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1992 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: P K Sneed; M D Prados; M W McDermott; D A Larson; M K Malec; K R Lamborn; R L Davis; K A Weaver; W M Wara; T L Phillips Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: P H Gutin; T L Phillips; W M Wara; S A Leibel; Y Hosobuchi; V A Levin; K A Weaver; S Lamb Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 1984-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Dilini S Pinnaduwage; Shiv P Srivastava; Xiangsheng Yan; Shyam Jani; David G Brachman; Stephen P Sorensen Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022 Jan-Dec