Literature DB >> 31471664

Socio-economic inequalities in fragility fracture outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic observational studies.

G Valentin1, S E Pedersen2, R Christensen3, K Friis2, C P Nielsen2, A Bhimjiyani4, C L Gregson4, B L Langdahl5.   

Abstract

Individuals with low socio-economic status (SES) have a higher risk of dying following hip fracture compared with individuals with high SES. Evidence on social inequalities in non-hip fractures is lacking as well as evidence on the impact of SES on health-related quality of life post fracture.
INTRODUCTION: Fragility fractures, especially of the hip, cause substantial excess mortality and impairment in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between socio-economic status (SES) and post-fracture mortality and HRQoL.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to the last week of November 2018 for studies reporting an association between SES and post-fracture mortality and/or HRQoL among people aged ≥ 50 years. Risk ratios (RRs) were meta-analyzed using a standard inverse-variance-weighted random effects model. Studies using individual-level and area-based SES measures were analyzed separately.
RESULTS: A total of 24 studies from 15 different countries and involving more than one million patients with hip fractures were included. The overall risk of mortality within 1-year post-hip fracture in individuals with low SES was 24% higher than in individuals with high SES (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.29) for individual-level SES measures, and 14% (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.19) for area-based SES measures. The quality of the evidence for the outcome mortality was moderate. Using individual SES measures, we estimated the excess HRQoL loss to be 5% (95% CI - 1 to 10%) among hip fracture patients with low SES compared with high SES.
CONCLUSIONS: We found a consistently increased risk of post-hip fracture mortality with low SES across SES measures and across countries with different political structures and different health and social care infrastructures. The impact of SES on post-fracture HRQoL remains uncertain due to sparse and low-quality evidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fractures; Health-related quality of life; Inequality; Mortality; Socio-economic status

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31471664     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05143-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  44 in total

1.  The contributions of First Nations ethnicity, income, and delays in surgery on mortality post-fracture: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  W D Leslie; S L Brennan; H J Prior; L M Lix; C Metge; B Elias
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Mortality and institutionalization following hip fracture.

Authors:  M Cree; C L Soskolne; E Belseck; J Hornig; J E McElhaney; R Brant; M Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Predicting the prognosis after proximal femoral fracture.

Authors:  M Hubble; C Little; D Prothero; G Bannister
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Factors associated with mortality and functional disability after hip fracture: an inception cohort study.

Authors:  Javier Alegre-López; José Cordero-Guevara; José L Alonso-Valdivielso; Julia Fernández-Melón
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-30       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

6.  Undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly: predicting fixation failure and mortality. A prospective study of 162 patients.

Authors:  N D Clement; K Green; N Murray; A D Duckworth; M M McQueen; C M Court-Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Increased mortality in patients with a hip fracture-effect of pre-morbid conditions and post-fracture complications.

Authors:  P Vestergaard; L Rejnmark; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework.

Authors:  Anna Huguet; Jill A Hayden; Jennifer Stinson; Patrick J McGrath; Christine T Chambers; Michelle E Tougas; Lori Wozney
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-05

9.  One-Year Mortality After Hip Fracture: Development and Validation of a Prognostic Index.

Authors:  Irena S Cenzer; Victoria Tang; W John Boscardin; Alexander K Smith; Christine Ritchie; Margaret I Wallhagen; Roxanne Espaldon; Kenneth E Covinsky
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 10.  Quality of life and psychological consequences in elderly patients after a hip fracture: a review.

Authors:  Konstantinos I Alexiou; Andreas Roushias; Sokratis E Varitimidis; Konstantinos N Malizos
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.458

View more
  6 in total

1.  Fragility fractures and health-related quality of life: does socio-economic status widen the gap? A population-based study.

Authors:  G Valentin; K Friis; C P Nielsen; F B Larsen; B L Langdahl
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Social deprivation predicts adverse health outcomes after hospital admission with hip fracture in England.

Authors:  R Patel; A Bhimjiyani; Y Ben-Shlomo; C L Gregson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Prognostic factors for predicting health-related quality of life after intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sheila Sprague; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Sofia Bzovsky; Radovan Zdero; Mohit Bhandari; Marc Swiontkowski; Paul Tornetta; David Sanders; Emil Schemitsch
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-01-05

4.  Trends in Hip Fracture Incidence, Recurrence, and Survival by Education and Comorbidity: A Swedish Register-based Study.

Authors:  Anna C Meyer; Stina Ek; Sven Drefahl; Anders Ahlbom; Margareta Hedström; Karin Modig
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.860

5.  Recovery of quality of life is associated with lower mortality 5-year post-fracture: the Australian arm of the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (AusICUROS).

Authors:  Jason Talevski; Kerrie M Sanders; Sara Vogrin; Gustavo Duque; Alison Beauchamp; Ego Seeman; Sandra Iuliano; Axel Svedbom; Fredrik Borgström; John A Kanis; Amanda L Stuart; Sharon L Brennan-Olsen
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 6.  Post-fracture care programs for prevention of subsequent fragility fractures: a literature assessment of current trends.

Authors:  K E Åkesson; K Ganda; C Deignan; M K Oates; A Volpert; K Brooks; D Lee; D R Dirschl; A J Singer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.