Literature DB >> 10733054

Mortality and institutionalization following hip fracture.

M Cree1, C L Soskolne, E Belseck, J Hornig, J E McElhaney, R Brant, M Suarez-Almazor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify determinants of mortality and institutionalization after hip fracture and to identify those older hip fracture patients at high risk of death or institutionalization after hip fracture.
DESIGN: Population-based prospective inception cohort study of hip fracture patients; patients were assessed in the hospital and at 3 months following the hip fracture.
SETTING: Edmonton area hip fracture patients admitted to one of two Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, acute care centers between July 10, 1996, and August 31, 1997. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were residents of the Edmonton area and over the age of 64. Those who had previously fractured the same hip within the past 5 years or had some pathological condition underlying the hip fracture were excluded. Of 610 eligible patients, 558 contributed some baseline information and were included in the mortality analysis; the institutionalization analysis was restricted to the 338 patients who lived in the community before fracture, survived the 3-month period postfracture, and had completed a 3-month follow-up interview. MEASUREMENTS: The baseline interview was done in the hospital to assess mental status, prefracture physical function, prefracture health perception, and prefracture social support. The 3-month follow-up interview was done by phone to assess physical function, health perception, and social support 3 months postfracture. Demographic and comorbidity information was collected from medical records.
RESULTS: Low mental status in hospital was found to increase the chances of mortality and institutionalization, and male gender was found to increase mortality risk fourfold. Each additional 10 years of age increased the risk of institutionalization approximately 2.5 times. Patients with lower postfracture physical function had at least five times the risk of institutionalization compared to patients with high postfracture physical function.
CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment, older age, and gender were associated with increased risk of poor outcome following hip fracture. The socioeconomic variables--social support and health perception--did not contribute significant additional information in explaining mortality or institutionalization risk. While demographic factors cannot be modified, physical function 3 months postfracture may be amenable to intervention and may reduce the risk of institutionalization. Intervening to increase postfracture physical function may be particularly beneficial to older patients, or to those who are cognitively impaired.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10733054     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb02647.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  62 in total

1.  Functional Outcomes After Hip Fracture in Independent Community-Dwelling Patients.

Authors:  Jennifer A Ouellet; Gregory M Ouellet; Alison M Romegialli; Marilyn Hirsch; Lisa Berardi; Christine M Ramsey; Leo M Cooney; Lisa M Walke
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 2.  Fracture Liaison Services in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Paul J Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Comparison of direct health care costs related to the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis and to the management of osteoporotic fractures among compliant and noncompliant users of alendronate and risedronate: a population-based study.

Authors:  J Blouin; A Dragomir; M Fredette; L-G Ste-Marie; J C Fernandes; S Perreault
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Dementia and co-occurring chronic conditions: a systematic literature review to identify what is known and where are the gaps in the evidence?

Authors:  Mark B Snowden; Lesley E Steinman; Lucinda L Bryant; Monique M Cherrier; Kurt J Greenlund; Katherine H Leith; Cari Levy; Rebecca G Logsdon; Catherine Copeland; Mia Vogel; Lynda A Anderson; David C Atkins; Janice F Bell; Annette L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.485

5.  Risk factors of mortality during the first year after low energy osteoporosis fracture: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Aurore Lloret; Guillaume Coiffier; Tiffen Couchouron; Aleth Perdriger; Pascal Guggenbuhl
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

6.  Androgen deprivation increases the risk of fracture in prostate cancer patients: a population-based study in Chinese patients.

Authors:  C-T Wu; Y-H Yang; P-C Chen; M-F Chen; W-C Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Reduced morbidity for elderly patients with a hip fracture after implementation of a perioperative evidence-based clinical pathway.

Authors:  L A Beaupre; J G Cinats; A Senthilselvan; D Lier; C A Jones; A Scharfenberger; D W C Johnston; L D Saunders
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-10

8.  Quality of life, morbidity, and mortality after low trauma hip fracture in men.

Authors:  I Pande; D L Scott; T W O'Neill; C Pritchard; A D Woolf; M J Davis
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

10.  Functional outcomes and mortality vary among different types of hip fractures: a function of patient characteristics.

Authors:  Roger Cornwall; Marvin S Gilbert; Kenneth J Koval; Elton Strauss; Albert L Siu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.