T K Price1, E E Hilt1, K Thomas-White1,2, E R Mueller3, A J Wolfe1, L Brubaker4. 1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA. 2. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. 3. Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterise the bladder microbiota of continent adult women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of adult women who contributed catheterised urine samples, completed validated symptom questionnaires, and provided demographic data. SETTING: US academic medical centre. POPULATION: Well-characterised continent adult women. METHODS: Participants contributed symptoms questionnaires, demographic data, and catheterised urine samples that were analysed by enhanced urine culture methodology and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between demographics and microbial community state structures (urotypes, defined by the dominant taxon of each specimen). RESULTS: The bladder microbiota (urobiome) of a control group of 224 continent women were characterised, demonstrating variability in terms of urotype. The most common urotype was Lactobacillus (19%), which did not differ with any demographic. In contrast, the Gardnerella (P < 0.001) and Escherichia (P = 0.005) urotypes were more common in younger and older women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For urobiome research, enhanced culture methods and/or DNA sequencing are the preferred techniques for bacterial detection. The interpretation of clinical tests, such as the standard urine culture, should incorporate the knowledge that some women have Gardnerella or Escherichia urotypes without evidence of any clinical disorder. Clinical care strategies should preserve or restore the beneficial effects of the native urobiome, as disruption of that microbial community could result in unintended vulnerability to uropathogen invasion or opportunistic pathogen overgrowth. Longitudinal studies of urobiome responses to therapies should be encouraged. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: In continent adult women bladder microbiome composition differs by age, with relevance for clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To characterise the bladder microbiota of continent adult women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of adult women who contributed catheterised urine samples, completed validated symptom questionnaires, and provided demographic data. SETTING: US academic medical centre. POPULATION: Well-characterised continent adult women. METHODS:Participants contributed symptoms questionnaires, demographic data, and catheterised urine samples that were analysed by enhanced urine culture methodology and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between demographics and microbial community state structures (urotypes, defined by the dominant taxon of each specimen). RESULTS: The bladder microbiota (urobiome) of a control group of 224 continent women were characterised, demonstrating variability in terms of urotype. The most common urotype was Lactobacillus (19%), which did not differ with any demographic. In contrast, the Gardnerella (P < 0.001) and Escherichia (P = 0.005) urotypes were more common in younger and older women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For urobiome research, enhanced culture methods and/or DNA sequencing are the preferred techniques for bacterial detection. The interpretation of clinical tests, such as the standard urine culture, should incorporate the knowledge that some women have Gardnerella or Escherichia urotypes without evidence of any clinical disorder. Clinical care strategies should preserve or restore the beneficial effects of the native urobiome, as disruption of that microbial community could result in unintended vulnerability to uropathogen invasion or opportunistic pathogen overgrowth. Longitudinal studies of urobiome responses to therapies should be encouraged. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: In continent adult women bladder microbiome composition differs by age, with relevance for clinical practice.
Authors: Jacques Ravel; Pawel Gajer; Zaid Abdo; G Maria Schneider; Sara S K Koenig; Stacey L McCulle; Shara Karlebach; Reshma Gorle; Jennifer Russell; Carol O Tacket; Rebecca M Brotman; Catherine C Davis; Kevin Ault; Ligia Peralta; Larry J Forney Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Cynthia S Fok; Xiang Gao; Huaiying Lin; Krystal J Thomas-White; Elizabeth R Mueller; Alan J Wolfe; Qunfeng Dong; Linda Brubaker Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Linda Brubaker; Charles W Nager; Holly E Richter; Anthony Visco; Ingrid Nygaard; Matthew D Barber; Joseph Schaffer; Susan Meikle; Dennis Wallace; Noriko Shibata; Alan J Wolfe Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Derrick E Fouts; Rembert Pieper; Sebastian Szpakowski; Hans Pohl; Susan Knoblach; Moo-Jin Suh; Shih-Ting Huang; Inger Ljungberg; Bruce M Sprague; Sarah K Lucas; Manolito Torralba; Karen E Nelson; Suzanne L Groah Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Rebecca M Brotman; Michelle D Shardell; Pawel Gajer; Doug Fadrosh; Kathryn Chang; Michelle I Silver; Raphael P Viscidi; Anne E Burke; Jacques Ravel; Patti E Gravitt Journal: Menopause Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.310
Authors: Yuko M Komesu; Holly E Richter; Benjamin Carper; Darrell L Dinwiddie; Emily S Lukacz; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Vivian W Sung; Halina M Zyczynski; Beri Ridgeway; Rebecca G Rogers; Lily A Arya; Donna Mazloomdoost; Marie G Gantz Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2018-06-16 Impact factor: 1.932
Authors: Lisa Karstens; Mark Asquith; Sean Davin; Patrick Stauffer; Damien Fair; W Thomas Gregory; James T Rosenbaum; Shannon K McWeeney; Rahel Nardos Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Loreto Parga-Vidal; Michiel C van Aalderen; Regina Stark; Klaas P J M van Gisbergen Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 28.314
Authors: Nicole M Gilbert; Valerie P O'Brien; Chevaughn Waller; Ekatherina Batourina; Cathy Lee Mendelsohn; Amanda L Lewis Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 6.073
Authors: James A Johnson; Lydia F Delaney; Vaishali Ojha; Medha Rudraraju; Kaylie R Hintze; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Tatyana A Sysoeva Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 6.073
Authors: J Curtis Nickel; Alisa Stephens; A Lenore Ackerman; Jennifer T Anger; Henry H Lai; Garth D Ehrlich Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 2.052
Authors: Virginia Perez-Carrasco; Ana Soriano-Lerma; Miguel Soriano; José Gutiérrez-Fernández; Jose A Garcia-Salcedo Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Taylor Miller-Ensminger; Rita Mormando; Laura Maskeri; Jason W Shapiro; Alan J Wolfe; Catherine Putonti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kathryn L Burgio; Aimee S James; D Yvette LaCoursiere; Elizabeth R Mueller; Diane K Newman; Lisa Kane Low; Kevin P Weinfurt; Jean F Wyman; Shayna D Cunningham; Keith Vargo; John Connett; Beverly Rosa Williams Journal: Urology Date: 2020-08-22 Impact factor: 2.649