| Literature DB >> 22929533 |
Derrick E Fouts1, Rembert Pieper, Sebastian Szpakowski, Hans Pohl, Susan Knoblach, Moo-Jin Suh, Shih-Ting Huang, Inger Ljungberg, Bruce M Sprague, Sarah K Lucas, Manolito Torralba, Karen E Nelson, Suzanne L Groah.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical dogma is that healthy urine is sterile and the presence of bacteria with an inflammatory response is indicative of urinary tract infection (UTI). Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) represents the state in which bacteria are present but the inflammatory response is negligible. Differentiating ABU from UTI is diagnostically challenging, but critical because overtreatment of ABU can perpetuate antimicrobial resistance while undertreatment of UTI can result in increased morbidity and mortality. In this study, we describe key characteristics of the healthy and ABU urine microbiomes utilizing 16S rRNA gene (16S rDNA) sequencing and metaproteomics, with the future goal of utilizing this information to personalize the treatment of UTI based on key individual characteristics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22929533 PMCID: PMC3511201 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Patient demographics
| | | | | | |||
| S01 | Female | 40 | Asian | n/a | NEG | 0 | NEG |
| S02 | Male | 24 | Asian | n/a | NEG | 0 | NEG |
| S03 | Female | 32 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 0 | NEG |
| S04 | Female | 35 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 0 | |
| S05 | Male | 32 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | NEG |
| S06 | Female | 57 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | NEG |
| S07 | Male | 35 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | NEG |
| S08 | Female | 43 | African American | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | NEG |
| S09 | Female | 25 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | NEG |
| S10 | Female | 34 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | NEG |
| S11 | Male | 33 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | NEG |
| S12 | Male | 29 | Asian | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | NEG |
| S13 | Male | 35 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | NEG |
| S14 | Female | 22 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | |
| S15 | Female | 34 | Asian | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | |
| S16 | Female | 45 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 0-1 | |
| S17 | Female | 46 | African American | n/a | TRA | 0-1 | |
| S18 | Female | 51 | Asian | n/a | NEG | 1-2 | |
| S19 | Female | 40 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 1-2 | |
| S20 | Male | 50 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 1-2 | NEG |
| S21 | Male | 25 | Caucasian | n/a | NEG | 5-9 | NEG |
| S22 | Male | 29 | Caucasian | n/a | 1+ | 1-2 | NEG |
| S23 | Female | 30 | Caucasian | n/a | 1+ | 3-4 | NEG |
| S24 | Male | 39 | Caucasian | n/a | 2+ | 5-9 | NEG |
| S25 | Female | 27 | Asian | n/a | 2+ | 100+ | |
| S26 | Male | 33 | Asian | n/a | 3+ | 30-49 | NEG |
| | | | | ||||
| S27 | Male | 20 | African American | 9 | ND | ND | NEG |
| S28 | Male | 31 | African American | 157 | ND | ND | NEG |
| S29 | Male | 19 | Caucasian | 3 | NEG | 1-2 | |
| S30 | Female | 41 | African American | 1 | NEG | 1-2 | |
| S31 | Female | 54 | Caucasian | 1 | TRA | 1-2 | NEG |
| S32 | Male | 31 | African American | 158 | TRA | 3-4 | |
| S33 | Male | 48 | Hispanic | 1 | 2+ | 5-9 | |
| S34 | Female | 54 | Caucasian | 2 | 2+ | 5-9 | |
| | | | | ||||
| S35 | Male | 40 | African American | 84 | NEG | 0 | |
| S36 | Female | 36 | Caucasian | 7 | NEG | 0-1 | |
| S37 | Female | 55 | Caucasian | 3 | NEG | 1-2 | NEG |
| S38 | Female | 55 | Caucasian | 442 | NEG | 1-2 | NEG |
| S39 | Male | 48 | Native American | 261 | NEG | 3-4 | |
| S40 | Male | 48 | Native American | 260 | 1+ | 3-4 | NEG |
| S41 | Female | 50 | Caucasian | 2 | 2+ | 3-4 | NEG |
| S42 | Male | 21 | African American | 62 | 2+ | 5-9 | |
| | | | | ||||
| S43 | Female | 47 | African American | 79 | ND | ND | NEG |
| S44 | Female | 47 | African American | 80 | NEG | 0 | |
| S45 | Male | 23 | African American | 20 | NEG | 0-1 | |
| S46 | Female | 40 | African American | 236 | NEG | 1-2 | |
| S47 | Female | 40 | African American | 235 | NEG | 3-4 | NEG |
| S48 | Female | 61 | Caucasian | 469 | TRA | 1-2 | |
| S49 | Male | 27 | African American | 92 | 1+ | 3-4 | |
| S50 | Female | 40 | African American | 235 | 1+ | 15-19 | NEG |
| S51 | Male | 48 | African American | 18 | 2+ | 5-9 | |
| S52 | Male | 20 | African American | 25 | 2+ | 10-14 | NEG |
| S53 | Male | 21 | African American | 7 | 2+ | 50+ | NEG |
No.= number, WBC = white blood cells, hpf = high power field, HC = healthy control, IC = intermittent catheter, FC = Foley catheter, NEG = negative, TRA = trace, n/a = not applicable, ND = not determined, ESBL = Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamases.
Figure 1Differences in relative bacterial OTU counts between neuropathic and healthy bladder in males and females. For every individual, the OTU counts were normalized to the individual's total OTU count. A heat map of the clustered distribution of OTU taxonomy at the level of bacterial order (A) and genus (B) was constructed using the Bray-Curtis index. For panels A and B, only the taxa with a standard deviation > 5% across all individuals are shown. Differences in the average OTU count between females and males are plotted in light and dark gray, respectively (C). In panel (C), the top 15 (8%) most abundant bacterial OTUs are represented. The X-axis indicates the difference in relative OTU counts per bacterial genus indicated on the Y-axis. Statistical significance was established using Kruskal-Wallis test. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between the relative OTU counts are indicated by an asterisk (*) for bladder function, and a plus sign (+) for gender.
Figure 2OTU differences among individuals by duration of neuropathic bladder. A PCA analysis of the OTU counts of 52 individuals. The points are circled and colored based on the duration (in months) of neuropathic bladder (see key). The inset depicts a vector plot indicating the most influential principal component (bacterial genus).
Figure 3Differences in the relative OTU counts between males and females stratified by bladder management. For every individual, the OTU counts were normalized to the individual’s total OTU count. Differences between relative OTU counts were calculated by subtracting the average OTU counts from females and males per bladder management category; healthy control, void (SCI patient with no catheter usage), indwelling catheter (IC), and Foley catheter (FC) (see key for color coding and sample sizes). The X-axis indicates the difference in relative OTU counts per bacterial genus indicated on the Y-axis. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between the relative OTU counts are indicated by plus sign (+) for gender, and an asterisk (*) for bladder management. The inset depicts the mean and standard deviation of OTU counts of the indicated genera for each catheter management group.
Figure 4Phylogenetic diversity of Lactobacillales 16S rDNA sequences in human urine. NJ tree clustering of Lactobacillales OTU representatives labeled based on similarity to known RDP database sequences (gray), and OTU composition. Leaves are colored as follows: OTUs consisting of only healthy individuals (dark blue), mostly healthy (light blue), only NB (red), mostly NB (pink/salmon). Branches were highlighted and labeled by identifiable bacterial genera. Genus-level classification was based on the OTU representative RDP classification and the classification of nearest neighbors the RDP alignment. The nodes show SequenceID_#male/#female_#SCI/#healthy subjects.
Figure 5Phylogenetic diversity of Enterobacteriales 16S rDNA sequences in human urine. NJ tree clustering of Enterobacteriales OTU representatives labeled based on similarity to known RDP database sequences (gray), and OTU composition. Leaves are colored as follows: OTUs consisting of only healthy individuals (dark blue), mostly healthy (light blue), only NB (red), mostly NB (pink/salmon). Branches were highlighted and labeled by identifiable bacterial genera. Genus-level classification was based on the OTU representative RDP classification and the classification of nearest neighbors the RDP alignment. The nodes show SequenceID_#male/#female_#SCI/#healthy subjects.
Bacterial profiles of urinary samples
| 1(HC) | - | - | NEG | 0 | |
| 16(HC) | Lj | NEG | 0-1 | ||
| 31(void) | Ec, Eh, Kp | - | TRA | 1-2 | |
| 33(void) | - | Ec, Ef | 2+ | 5-9 | |
| 34(void) | Ec, Eh, Kp | 2+ | 5-9 | ||
| 36(IC) | Ec, Eh | Ec | NEG | 0-1 | |
| 37(IC) | - | - | NEG | 1-2 | |
| 39(IC) | Ec, Kp | Kp | NEG | 3-4 | |
| 45(FC) | Eh, Kp, Pa, Pm# | Ec, Ef, Kp, Pa, Ps | NEG | 0-1 | |
| 51(FC) | Ec, Eh, Pa, Sp | Ec, Ef, Pa | 2+ | 5-9 |
*Not comprehensive. 16S rDNA data is at the genus level.
#The species for this sample were determined from urine cultures, but based on shotgun proteomic analysis after protein extraction from colonies.
Ec Escherichia coli, Eh Enterobacter hormaechei, Ef Enterococcus faecalis, Kp Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pa Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pm Proteus mirabilis, Ps Providencia stuartii, Sp Streptococcus pneumoniae.
WBC = white blood cells, HC = healthy control, IC = intermittent catheter, FC = Foley catheter, NEG = negative, TRA = trace.
Human and bacterial proteins potentially contributing directly or indirectly to host-pathogen interactions in the urinary tract
| Protein S100-A9 Calprotectin L1H subunit | S10A9 | 60 | Pro-inflammatory, metal ion-chelating | 1,16,33,36,51 |
| Protein S100-A8, Calprotectin L1L subunit | S10A8 | 10 | Pro-inflammatory, metal ion-chelating | 1,16,36,51 |
| Protein S100-A12 | S10AC | 14 | Pro-inflammatory | 36 |
| Myeloperoxidase | PERM | 13 | Microbicidal | 36,51 |
| Eosinophil peroxidase | PERE | 4 | Microbicidal | 51 |
| Lactotransferrin | TRFL | 6 | Pro-inflammatory, iron-chelating | 36 |
| 14-3-3 protein sigma | SFN | 5 | DNA damage response, cell proliferation | 16 |
| SNC66 protein | - | 12 | Secreted, Ig-like domain | 51 |
| Heat shock protein beta-1 | HSPB1 | 20 | Anti-inflammatory, cell proliferation | 1 |
| Annexin A2 | ANXA2 | 8 | Cell proliferation, cell adhesion | 16 |
| Uromodulin | UMOD | 78 | Cell protection, inhibitor of Ca crystallization, | 1,16,31,36,37,39,51 |
| Cystatin-B | CYTB | 8 | Immunomodulatory, cathepsin inhibitor | 1,16 |
| 14-3-3 protein zeta/delta | YWHAZ | 2 | Adaptor protein, tyrosine phosphorylation pathways | 1,16 |
| Serpin B3 | SPB3 | 7 | Immunomodulatory, serine protease inhibitor | 16 |
| Small proline-rich protein 3 | SPRR3 | 7 | Cell repair and proliferation | 16 |
| Annexin A1 | ANXA1 | 28 | Anti-apoptotic, T-cell differen-tiation, signaling pathways | 1,16,31,34,37,39 |
| Glutathione S-transferase P | GSTP1 | 3 | Anti-apoptotic, tyrosine phosphorylation pathways | 1,16,31,34,37 |
| | | | ||
| Colicin receptor CirA | Ec | 2 | Iron/colicin-binding | 36 |
| OM heme/hemoglobin receptor ChuA | Ec | 12 | Iron-binding | 51 |
| Putative pesticin receptor Psn | Ec | 23 | Iron-binding | 51 |
| Ferrienterobactin receptor FepA | Eh | 9 | Iron-binding | 51 |
| Putative fimbrillin MatB | Ec | 2 | Adhesion | 51 |
| Flagellin protein type B FliC | Pa | 13 | Mobility and adhesion | 51 |
| Flagellin protein FliC | Eh | 8 | Mobility and adhesion | 51 |
| Flagellin | Ec | 7 | Mobility and adhesion | 51 |
| Ferrienterobactin receptor FepA | Ec | 22 | Iron-binding | 36, 51 |
Section one of the table lists proteins with potential pro/anti-inflammatory, immune-modulatory and microbicidal activities. Section two lists identified bacterial proteins implicated in virulence/survival or serving as a target for host defensive mechanisms.
PSMs: the highest number of peptide-spectral matches (PSMs) is provided for each listed protein * for species abbreviations, see Table 2 (minimal Mascot Percolator PEP value: 10-4).