Jennifer O Kearns1, John G Barry1, Garry J P Fleming2. 1. Materials Science Unit, Division of Oral Biosciences, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Lincoln Place, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. 2. Materials Science Unit, Division of Oral Biosciences, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Lincoln Place, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. Electronic address: garry.fleming@dental.tcd.ie.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the adhesive performance of three universal bonding systems (self-etch and total-etch protocols) with cuspal deflection and cervical microleakage score. METHODS: Fifty-six standardised sound maxillary premolar teeth with uniform mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavities were randomly allocated to six groups. Restoration with resin-based composite (RBC) was performed in conjunction with a universal bonding system facilitated by a quartz-tungsten-halogen light-curing-unit. The dependent variable was the universal bonding protocol (self-etch or total-etch). Buccal and palatal cuspal deflections were recorded at 0, 30, 60 and 180s post-irradiation using a twin channel deflection measuring gauge. Following restoration, the teeth subjected to 500 thermocycles, immersed in a 0.2% basic fuchsin dye for 24h, sectioned and examined for cervical microleakage. RESULTS: Comparing between bonding protocol (self-etch or total-etch), a decrease in total cuspal deflection and a concomitant increase in cervical microleakage were evident when employing the total-etch compared with the self-etch protocol for two of the three universal dental adhesives. CONCLUSIONS: The 'Adhesion-Decalcification concept' suggests a trend towards 'mild self-etch' adhesives. Differences in adhesive performance (cuspal deflection and cervical microleakage) between the teeth restored using the self-etch or total-etch protocols is suggested to be a result of the pH of the self-etch solutions. 'Mild self-etch' (pH∼2.0) adhesives out-performed ultra-mild (pH>2.5) or strong (pH<1.5) self-etch solutions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Poorly performing adhesives could be identified using the cuspal deflection and cervical microleakage protocol reported which could save the complications encountered clinically with Class II RBC restorations.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the adhesive performance of three universal bonding systems (self-etch and total-etch protocols) with cuspal deflection and cervical microleakage score. METHODS: Fifty-six standardised sound maxillary premolar teeth with uniform mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavities were randomly allocated to six groups. Restoration with resin-based composite (RBC) was performed in conjunction with a universal bonding system facilitated by a quartz-tungsten-halogen light-curing-unit. The dependent variable was the universal bonding protocol (self-etch or total-etch). Buccal and palatal cuspal deflections were recorded at 0, 30, 60 and 180s post-irradiation using a twin channel deflection measuring gauge. Following restoration, the teeth subjected to 500 thermocycles, immersed in a 0.2% basic fuchsin dye for 24h, sectioned and examined for cervical microleakage. RESULTS: Comparing between bonding protocol (self-etch or total-etch), a decrease in total cuspal deflection and a concomitant increase in cervical microleakage were evident when employing the total-etch compared with the self-etch protocol for two of the three universal dental adhesives. CONCLUSIONS: The 'Adhesion-Decalcification concept' suggests a trend towards 'mild self-etch' adhesives. Differences in adhesive performance (cuspal deflection and cervical microleakage) between the teeth restored using the self-etch or total-etch protocols is suggested to be a result of the pH of the self-etch solutions. 'Mild self-etch' (pH∼2.0) adhesives out-performed ultra-mild (pH>2.5) or strong (pH<1.5) self-etch solutions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Poorly performing adhesives could be identified using the cuspal deflection and cervical microleakage protocol reported which could save the complications encountered clinically with Class II RBC restorations.