Literature DB >> 31468241

Biophysically interpretable inference of single neuron dynamics.

Vignesh Narayanan1, Jr-Shin Li2, ShiNung Ching2.   

Abstract

Identification of key ionic channel contributors to the overall dynamics of a neuron is an important problem in experimental neuroscience. Such a problem is challenging since even in the best cases, identification relies on noisy recordings of membrane potential only, and strict inversion to the constituent channel dynamics is mathematically ill-posed. In this work, we develop a biophysically interpretable, learning-based strategy for data-driven inference of neuronal dynamics. In particular, we propose two optimization frameworks to learn and approximate neural dynamics from an observed voltage trajectory. In both the proposed strategies, the membrane potential dynamics are approximated as a weighted sum of ionic currents. In the first strategy, the ionic currents are represented using voltage dependent channel conductances and membrane potential in a parametric form, while in the second strategy, the currents are represented as a linear combination of generic basis functions. A library of channel activation/inactivation and time-constant curves describing prototypical channel kinetics are used to provide estimates of the channel variables to approximate the ionic currents. Finally, a linear optimization problem is solved to infer the weights/scaling variables in the membrane-potential dynamics. In the first strategy, the weights can be used to recover the channel conductances, and the reversal potentials while in the second strategy, using the estimated weights, active channels can be inferred and the trajectory of the gating variables are recovered, allowing for biophysically salient inference. Our results suggest that the complex nonlinear behavior of the neural dynamics over a range of temporal scales can be efficiently inferred in a data-driven manner from noisy membrane potential recordings.

Keywords:  Conductance based model; Identification; Learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31468241     DOI: 10.1007/s10827-019-00723-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  12 in total

1.  An improved parameter estimation method for Hodgkin-Huxley models.

Authors:  A R Willms; D J Baro; R M Harris-Warrick; J Guckenheimer
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve.

Authors:  A L HODGKIN; A F HUXLEY
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1952-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Ion channel degeneracy enables robust and tunable neuronal firing rates.

Authors:  Guillaume Drion; Timothy O'Leary; Eve Marder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks.

Authors:  K S Narendra; K Parthasarathy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1990

5.  Simple model of spiking neurons.

Authors:  E M Izhikevich
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  2003

Review 6.  Automated neuron model optimization techniques: a review.

Authors:  W Van Geit; E De Schutter; P Achard
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Minimal Hodgkin-Huxley type models for different classes of cortical and thalamic neurons.

Authors:  Martin Pospischil; Maria Toledo-Rodriguez; Cyril Monier; Zuzanna Piwkowska; Thierry Bal; Yves Frégnac; Henry Markram; Alain Destexhe
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Neuroscience. How good are neuron models?

Authors:  Wulfram Gerstner; Richard Naud
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Tracking and control of neuronal Hodgkin-Huxley dynamics.

Authors:  Ghanim Ullah; Steven J Schiff
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2009-04-13

10.  Parameter estimation of neuron models using in-vitro and in-vivo electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Eoin P Lynch; Conor J Houghton
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.