Literature DB >> 31468128

Current status in whole genome sequencing and analysis of Ipomoea spp.

Sachiko Isobe1, Kenta Shirasawa2, Hideki Hirakawa2.   

Abstract

The recent advances of next-generation sequencing have made it possible to construct reference genome sequences in divergent species. However, de novo assembly at the chromosome level remains challenging in polyploid species, due to the existence of more than two pairs of homoeologous chromosomes in one nucleus. Cultivated sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) is a hexaploid species with 90 chromosomes (2n = 6X = 90). Although the origin of sweet potato is also still under discussion, diploid relative species, I. trifida and I. triloba have been considered as one of the most possible progenitors. In this manuscript, we review the recent results and activities of whole-genome sequencing in the genus Ipomoea series Batatas, I. trifida, I. triloba and sweet potato (I. batatas). Most of the results of genome assembly suggest that the genomes of sweet potato consist of two pairs and four pairs of subgenomes, i.e., B1B1B2B2B2B2. The results also revealed the relation between sweet potato and other Ipomoea species. Together with the development of bioinformatics approaches, the large-scale publicly available genome and transcript sequence resources and international genome sequencing streams are expected to promote the genome sequence dissection in sweet potato.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ipomoea; Sequencing; Sweet potato; Whole genome

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31468128      PMCID: PMC6797701          DOI: 10.1007/s00299-019-02464-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Rep        ISSN: 0721-7714            Impact factor:   4.570


Introduction

Genome and gene sequences have become essential information for a wide range of biological studies. A decade ago, high-quality reference sequences were available only for model or well-studied organisms. The recent advances of next-generation sequencing (NGS), however, have made it possible to construct reference genome sequences in divergent species, including plants. In plants, a total of 319 species have been registered as whole genome-sequenced species in the plaBiPD database (https://www.plabipd.de/, 2019 May). In addition to the number of sequenced species, the quality in de novo assembly of genomes has also been improved with advances in long reads sequencing technologies, such as the PacBio (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA) and Nanopore (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) sequencing platforms. Thus, the performance of reference-grade whole-genome sequencing has become common over the past 5 years. Advances in the bioinformatics of genome assembly are another key factor supporting the spread of de novo whole-genome sequencing in various species. Algorithms for genome assembly were first developed for haploid or diploid species, with a few for polyploid species. Therefore, construction of reference genomes continues to be less advanced in polyploid species than in diploids. Polyploidy is often observed in plant species and contributes to human life through crops such as wheat (Triticum aestivum), potato (Solanum tuberosum), strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa), coffee (Coffea arabica), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), and sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). However, de novo assembly at the chromosome level remains challenging in polyploid species, due to the existence of more than two pairs of homoeologous chromosomes in one nucleus. By 2018, only a total of 16 polyploid species had chromosome-level reference genomes (Kyriakidou et al. 2018). This was achieved due to advances in NGS technologies and bioinformatics. In addition, reference sequences of diploid relatives have helped to resolve the complexity of polyploid genomes. Therefore, reference genome constructions in related diploid species were often performed prior to de novo assembly in polyploid genomes (Bertioli et al. 2016; D’Hont et al. 2012; Ling et al. 2013; Shulaev et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012). Cultivated sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) is a hexaploid species with 90 chromosomes (2n = 6X = 90), and the structure of the hexaploid genome has not yet been defined. It was first considered an allohexaploid species based on cytological studies (Jones 1967; Magoon et al. 1970; Sinha and Sharma 1992). Later, several studies suggested that the genome structure of sweet potato was autohexaploid, based on the inheritance behaviors of DNA markers in linkage analysis (Cervantes-Flores et al. 2008; Kriegner et al. 2003; Ukoskit and Thompson 1997; Zhao et al. 2013). The origin of sweet potato is also still under discussion. The genus Ipomoea includes approximately 500–600 species, and sweet potato is the only species cultivated in the genus Ipomoea series Batatas (Austin 1988). Thirteen wild species are considered to be closely related to sweet potato (Austin 1988; Austin and Huáman 1996). Of these, I. trifida (H.B.K.) Don. has been considered the most likely progenitor (Nishiyama 1971; Shiotani and Kawase 1989). Nishiyama considered that sweet potato was derived from the hexaploid I. trifida, which was generated from the hybridization of the diploid I. leucantha Jacq. and tetraploid I. littoralis Blume. Shiotani and Kawase (1989) also hypothesized that the origin of sweet potato was hexaploid I. trifida, based on the development of an artificial hybridization of the diploid and tetraploid I. trifida accessions. Later, the hypothesis was strongly supported by Munoz-Rodrıguez et al. (2018) based on gene sequences comparison in genus Ipomoea and Wu et al. (2018) with whole-genome sequencing in sweet potato. The genome structures of diploid and tetraploid accessions were assumed to be B1B1 and B2B2B2B2, respectively; therefore, that of sweet potato was considered to be B1B1B2B2B2B2, a mixture of allo and auto polyploidy. A similar genome structure (AABBBB) was also suggested by Reddy et al. (2007). However, they considered that three Ipomoea species were possible ancestors, i.e., diploid I. triloba (A genome), diploid I. trifida (B genome), and tetraploid I. tabascana (B genome). It is expected that the whole genome sequence would reveal the features of the sweet potato genome, and the relation between sweet potato and other Ipomoea species. Construction of the reference genome sequence in sweet potato would also contribute to advances in genetic, genomic, and physiological studies of the species. In this manuscript, we review the recent results and activities of whole-genome sequencing in the genus Ipomoea series Batatas, including sweet potato.

Genome sequencing in diploid relatives of sweet potato, I. trifida and I. triloba

The first de novo whole-genome sequencing in diploid relatives of sweet potato was reported by Hirakawa et al. (2015) in I. trifida (Table 1). Two lines, Mx23Hm and 0431-1, were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq platform. Mx23Hm is a single descendant selfed line (S11) derived from Mx23-4, while 0431-1 is a highly heterozygous line. The two lines were selected for sequencing because Mx23-4, the ancestral line of Mx23Hm, and 0431-1 were used as parental lines for AFLP linkage map construction (Nakayama et al. 2010). Paired-end (PE) reads were assembled by SOAPdenovo2 r223 (Li et al. 2010), and scaffolding was done with mate pair (MP) reads by SSPACE2.0 (Boetzer et al. 2011). Mx23-4 generated 77,400 scaffolds with 513.0 Mb length, while 0431-1 had 181,194 that were 712.2 Mb in length. The estimated genome sizes in Mx23Hm and 0431-1 based on k-mer frequency analysis were 515.8 Mb and 539.9 Mb, respectively.
Table 1

Assembled nucleic whole genome sequences in genus Ipomoea series Batatas

SpeciesPolyploidyEstimated genome size (Mb)HeterozygositySequenced line nameSequence readsScaffoldsPseudo-molecule length (Mb)Number of predicted genesReferences
Number of sequencesTotal length (bp)N50 length (bp)
I. trifida Diploid515.8FewMx23HmIllumina (PE, MP)77,400512,990,88542,58662,407Hirakawa et al. (2015)
I. trifida Diploid539.9High0431-1Illumina (PE, MP)181,194712,155,58736,283109,449Hirakawa et al. (2015)
I. trifida Diploid526.4HighNCNSP0306Illumina (PE, MP), PacBio, BioNano (Irys)30,394461,997,5591,237,020373.444,158Wu et al. (2018)
I. triloba Diploid495.9FewNCNSP0323Illumina (PE, MP), PacBio, BioNano (Irys)4008457,835,4286,861,300443.347,008Wu et al. (2018)
I. trifida Diploid476.4HighY22Illumina (PE, MP, SLR), PacBio5264460,931,543607,924400.430,227Li et al. (2019)
Sweet potato (I. batatas)aHexaploidHighTaizhong6Illumina (PE, MP), Roche 454 (SE)35,919836,316,092200,728633.478,781Yang et al. (2017)

aScaffolds statistics represent haplotype-improved assembly

Assembled nucleic whole genome sequences in genus Ipomoea series Batatas aScaffolds statistics represent haplotype-improved assembly The total length in the assembled genome of 0431-1 was longer than the estimated genome size, probably due to probable separated haploid-level assemblies in highly heterozygous regions. The two assembled genomes were compared, and the assembled sequences were classified into core candidates, conserved between the two lines, and line-specific sequences. The total lengths of the core candidate sequences were 240 Mb (Mx23Hm) and 353 Mb (0431-1). The numbers of predicted genes in Mx23Hm and 0431-1 were 62,407 and 109,449, respectively. Although the assembled sequences were not chromosome level, they contributed to the advances in sweet potato studies as the first reference genomes (Shirasawa et al. 2017; Si et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2017). The first chromosome-level references in I. trifida and I. triloba were constructed by Wu et al. (2018) using a heterozygous line of I. trifida, NCNSP0306, and a highly homozygous line of I. triloba, NCNSP0323 (Table 1). Illumina PE and MP reads were obtained for both species, and assembly was performed by Platanus v1.2.1 (I. trifida; Kajitani et al. 2014) and SOAPdenovo2 (I. triloba). PacBio reads were used for gap filling, and BioNano genome maps were used to improve the assembly. In I. trifida, 30,394 scaffolds were generated with a total length of 462.0 Mb, whereas in I. triloba there were 4008 with a total length of 457.8 Mb. The high homozygosity of the sequenced line of I. triloba resulted in the longer length of the assembled scaffolds. A genotyping by sequencing (GBS)-based linkage map was constructed based on an F1I. trifida mapping population for pseudomolecule construction. Each group of 15 pseudomolecules were generated in I. trifida and I. triloba by aligning the scaffolds on the linkage map. The total length of pseudomolecules in I. trifida and I. triloba was 373.4 Mb (80.8% of the assembly) and 443.3 Mb (96.8% of the assembly), respectively. The numbers of predicted protein-encoding genes in I. trifida and I. triloba were 32,301 and 31,423, respectively. Illumina transcript read assembly was also performed in the sweet potato cultivar Beauregard, and the 43,296 generated protein sequences were used for comparative analysis with predicted proteomes from I. trifida and I. triloba. A total of 1680 Batatas complex specific protein clusters were identified in a comparison with other seven species I. nil (Japanese morning glory), tomato, potato, grapevine, Arabidopsis, rice, and Amborea trichopoda (basal angiosperm). The existence of whole-genome triplication in the genus Ipomoea was also suggested by comparisons with the grape genome. The utility of assembled genomes was also investigated by mapping 10× Genomics Chromium reads of sweet potato variety Tanzania onto the I. trifida and I. triloba genome assemblies. Although 390,303 regions in Tanzania were homologous to both assemblies, the existence of I. trifida- or I. triloba-specific regions suggested that the sweet potato genome contains sequences that are uniquely shared with the two species. In addition, Wu et al. (2018) accounted that contribution of I. trifida-like progenitor was approximately twice that of I. triloba-like progenitor. The result proves the hypothesis that the sweet potato genome structure is B1B1B2B2B2B2. The first established pseudomolecules in the two Ipomoea species has contributed revealing insight into the sweet potato genome. Another assembled genome sequence at the chromosome level was generated in an I. trifida variety, Y22, which forms a storage root (SR) (Li et al. 2019, Table 1). Illumina PE and MP reads were assembled by Platanus, and Moleculo synthetic long reads (SLRs) were used for gap filling. PacBio reads were further used to extend sequence continuity, and the sequence redundancy caused by heterozygosity was excluded using HaploMerger (Huang et al. 2012). As a result, 5264 scaffolds were generated with a total length of 460.9 Mb. A GBS-based linkage map derived from an F1 mapping population (Y25 × Y22) was constructed, and the 15 pseudomolecules were generated by aligning the scaffolds onto the linkage map. The total length of the pseudomolecules was 440.4 Mb, covering 86.9% of the assembled scaffolds. A total of 30,227 genes were predicted on the assembled scaffolds with the support of transcript reads from seven tissues in I. trifida—namely, leaf, flower, stigma, pollen, stem, root and seed. The divergence time of I. trifida and I. nil was estimated as 6.4 Mya, based on 1930 single-copy genes. This was earlier than the estimation of 3.6 Mya by Wu et al. (2018). The key genes in starch accumulation were further investigated based on RNA-Seq analysis in four different stages of root development, QTL mapping, and comparisons of gene families with other species, I. nil, tomato, Coffea canephora and Arabidopsis. Based on the obtained results, it was predicted that the beta-amylase gene family might be related to SR-formation, with BMY11 being the most responsible gene. Li et al. (2019) also deduced that the function of BMY11 was to split smaller starch granules in cells to synthesize larger starch granules, based on the expression pattern of BMY11 in I. trifida (Y22) and sweet potato (Xushu 18), and anatomical observation at different stages of SR development. Identification of a candidate gene relating SR development in I. trifida in this study suggested that sweet potato obtained ability of starch accumulation in root via mutation of gene expression in the I. trifida-like progenitor. The study also indicated the importance of existence of high-quality I. trifida reference genome to accelerate gene function analysis in sweet potato.

Genome sequencing in sweet potato

Yan et al. (2015) constructed a complete chloroplast (cp) genome in sweet potato with Illumina PE and MP reads of a Chinese cultivar, Xushu18. The sequences were assembled using Edena v2.1.1 (Hernandez et al. 2008), SOAPdenovo2 r240 and Velvet v1.0.12 (Zerbino and Birney 2008), and were combined by CD-HIT-EST and CAP3 (Huang and Madan 1999). The organellar sequences were isolated from the nuclear genome based on mapped read depth and number of copies. Then, cp genome sequences were identified by a BLAST search against I. trifida cp DNAs reported by Eserman et al. (2014). The isolated sequences were assembled into a circular molecule of 161,303 bp. A total of 145 genes were predicted on the genome, including 72 single- and 11 double-copy protein-encoding genes. Gene-flow and gene-gain-and-loss events were detected by comparing the chloroplast sequences of 33 species. Moreover, RNA-editing events and differential expressions of the chloroplast functional genes were identified by comparing sweet potato transcript sequences. Si et al. (2016) obtained genome-wide BAC-end sequences (BESs) using the Sanger method and investigated the features of the sweet potato genome. A total of 8310 BAC clones randomly selected from the 240,384 clones were sequenced at both ends, generating high quality 111,542 BESs with a total length of 7595,261 bp after trimming vector and low-quality sequences from 16,620 raw data. Known and unique sweet potato repetitive sequences accounted for 12.2% and 18.3% of the BESs, respectively. Based on the analysis of BESs, 10% of the sweet potato genome was estimated to consist of coding regions. The density of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) was estimated at one SSR per 1.93 Kb. It was a first report of genome sequencing in sweet potato and provided a platform for genetic and genomic studies such as DNA marker development and gene cloning. Yang et al. (2017) reported the first whole-genome de novo assembly in sweet potato (Table 1). A carotenoid-rich cultivar, Taizhong6, was used for genome sequencing, and libraries were constructed for Illumina PE, MP and Roche 454 single-end (SE) reads. The researchers developed a unique pipeline to constructed haplotype-resolved genome sequences. Preliminary assembly was performed first using IDBA-UD (Peng et al. 2012), Newbler 3.0 and Platanus, and a total of 57,051 sequences were generated with 831.9 Mb length. Then, variants among the homoeologous chromosomes were identified by mapping all Illumina reads. The 14,342,083 identified variants were used as seeds for haplotype phasing, and ~ 30% of the genome was phased into six haplotypes. Phased haplotypes were merged by overlapped sequences or PE reads. All the Illumina reads were mapped again onto the merged haplotype sequences and perfectly matched PE reads were used for haplotype connection. In this way, a haplotype-improved assembly was generated. The haplotype-improved assembly included a total of 35,919 scaffolds. The total and N50 lengths of the scaffolds were 836.3 Mb and 200.7 Kb, respectively. Fifteen pseudomolecules were constructed by anchoring 7470 of the 35,919 scaffolds to the I. nil genome (Hoshino et al. 2016). The total length of the 15 pseudomolecules was 633.4 Mb or 75.7% of the haplotype-improved assembly. By mapping transcript sequences of sweet potato generated in different tissues, 78,781 gene models were extracted on the 15 pseudomolecules. Haplotype-resolved regions were further identified based on the 15 pseudomolecules. A total of 644,810 regions were successfully phased and variants among homoeologous chromosomes were investigated. Phylogenetic analysis was also performed for the haplotype-resolved sequences, and the branching patterns of two haplotypes versus four haplotypes were identified on a UPGMA tree. The results suggested that the genome structure of sweet potato was B1B1B2B2B2B2. A dominant division of two versus two was also identified in the four-haplotype subgroup, suggesting the possibility of two whole-genome duplication (WGD) in sweet potato. Based on the mutation rate, it was predicted that the first and second WGD occurred 0.8 MYA and 0.5 MYA ago. Although miss-assembly in the constructed genome sequences was pointed out in later by Wu et al. (2018), it was a first report of whole-genome de novo assembly and contributed to reveal genome structured in sweet potato.

Databases

Currently, four databases (DBs) are available for genome sequences of sweet potato and its related species. Sweet potato Genomic Resource (http://sweetpotato.plantbiology.msu.edu/) This DB provides I. trifida and I. triloba genome sequences published by Wu et al. (2018). It is hosted by Michigan State University with the support of the GT4SP Improvement Project and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The DB has a genome browser (JBrowse), BLAT search, Annotation search and e-PCR tool. It is the most active DB in sweet potato genomic resources and data was renewed several times. Ipomoea Genome Hub (https://ipomoea-genome.org/) This DB provides sweet potato genome sequences published by Yang et al. (2017). It is hosted by the Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Max Planck Society, and Chinese Academy of Sciences. The DB has genome browsers (JBrowse and GBrowse), and a BLAST search. Because the Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden hosts the DB, the website is also connected to an image-based DB (the Ipomoea Atlas). Ipomoea Batatas Genome Browser (http://public-genomes-ngs.molgen.mpg.de/SweetPotato/) This DB stores sweet potato genome sequences published by Yang et al. (2017). It is hosted by MPI Molecular Genetics. The DB has a genome browser and BLAST search. Sweet potato GARDEN (http://sweetpotato-garden.kazusa.or.jp/) This DB provides I. trifida genome sequences published by Hirakawa et al. (2015) and is hosted by the Kazusa DNA Research Institute. The DB allows a BLAST search against genome, CDS and protein sequences. KEGG maps and a genetic map are also available. Ipomoea nil (http://viewer.shigen.info/asagao/) This DB provides I. nil genome sequences published by Hoshino et al. (2016). It is hosted by the Morning glory genome Consortium. The DB has genome browsers (JBrowse), and BLAST and BLAT searches.

Future perspectives

Recent progress in whole-genome sequences in sweet potato and its wild diploids has contributed to our understanding of the features of genome structures and evolutionary events. It is particularly worth noting that most of the results of genome assembly suggest that the genomes of sweet potato consist of two pairs and four pairs of subgenomes, i.e., B1B1B2B2B2B2. This fact also suggests that sweet potato remains a tough species for genetic and genomic analysis, because the discussion of statistics and bioinformatic approaches in mixtures of allo- and auto-polyploidy genomes is still in the early stages. To advance the exploration of this topic and for downstream use, it would be necessary to further enhance the quality of the reference genome of sweet potato. For example, Wu et al. (2018) found significant numbers of miss-assemblies in the sweet potato haplotype-resolved assembly constructed by Yang et al. (2017). Therefore, the GT4SP program, which develops next-generation breeder tools for African sweet potato breeders, had communicated with the authors of Yang et al. (2017) for evaluation of the sweet potato genome to use downstream analysis. One international genome-sequencing project is ongoing by the Trilateral Research Association of Sweet potato (TRAS) genome-sequencing consortium (Yoon et al. 2015). The consortium was launched in 2012, and consists of six organizations, the Jiangsu Xuzhou Sweet Potato Research Center (China), China Agricultural University (China), Rural Development Administration (Korea), Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (Korea), National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (Japan), and Kazusa DNA Research Institute (Japan). Haplotype-based assembly has been attempted with PacBio and Illumina reads. The NGS technologies have continually advanced, with improvements to both the quality and quantity of reads. Although capturing the sweet potato genome is still difficult at present, it is expected that we will find better solutions step by step, as has been the case in past studies. Together with the development of bioinformatics approaches, the large-scale publicly available genome and transcript sequence resources and international genome sequencing streams are expected to promote the genome sequence dissection in sweet potato.

Author contribution statement

SI wrote the whole manuscript as a corresponding author. KS and HH investigated and modified the manuscript.
  26 in total

1.  Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE.

Authors:  Marten Boetzer; Christiaan V Henkel; Hans J Jansen; Derek Butler; Walter Pirovano
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Reconciling Conflicting Phylogenies in the Origin of Sweet Potato and Dispersal to Polynesia.

Authors:  Pablo Muñoz-Rodríguez; Tom Carruthers; John R I Wood; Bethany R M Williams; Kevin Weitemier; Brent Kronmiller; David Ellis; Noelle L Anglin; Lucas Longway; Stephen A Harris; Mark D Rausher; Steven Kelly; Aaron Liston; Robert W Scotland
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Cytological evidence on the origin of sweet potato.

Authors:  M L Magoon; R Krishnan; K Vijaya Bai
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Draft genome of the wheat A-genome progenitor Triticum urartu.

Authors:  Hong-Qing Ling; Shancen Zhao; Dongcheng Liu; Junyi Wang; Hua Sun; Chi Zhang; Huajie Fan; Dong Li; Lingli Dong; Yong Tao; Chuan Gao; Huilan Wu; Yiwen Li; Yan Cui; Xiaosen Guo; Shusong Zheng; Biao Wang; Kang Yu; Qinsi Liang; Wenlong Yang; Xueyuan Lou; Jie Chen; Mingji Feng; Jianbo Jian; Xiaofei Zhang; Guangbin Luo; Ying Jiang; Junjie Liu; Zhaobao Wang; Yuhui Sha; Bairu Zhang; Huajun Wu; Dingzhong Tang; Qianhua Shen; Pengya Xue; Shenhao Zou; Xiujie Wang; Xin Liu; Famin Wang; Yanping Yang; Xueli An; Zhenying Dong; Kunpu Zhang; Xiangqi Zhang; Ming-Cheng Luo; Jan Dvorak; Yiping Tong; Jian Wang; Huanming Yang; Zhensheng Li; Daowen Wang; Aimin Zhang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  De novo bacterial genome sequencing: millions of very short reads assembled on a desktop computer.

Authors:  David Hernandez; Patrice François; Laurent Farinelli; Magne Osterås; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Analyses of the complete genome and gene expression of chloroplast of sweet potato [Ipomoea batata].

Authors:  Lang Yan; Xianjun Lai; Xuedan Li; Changhe Wei; Xuemei Tan; Yizheng Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A genome-wide BAC-end sequence survey provides first insights into sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) genome composition.

Authors:  Zengzhi Si; Bing Du; Jinxi Huo; Shaozhen He; Qingchang Liu; Hong Zhai
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Transcript profile analysis reveals important roles of jasmonic acid signalling pathway in the response of sweet potato to salt stress.

Authors:  Huan Zhang; Qian Zhang; Hong Zhai; Yan Li; Xiangfeng Wang; Qingchang Liu; Shaozhen He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Genome sequences of two diploid wild relatives of cultivated sweetpotato reveal targets for genetic improvement.

Authors:  Shan Wu; Kin H Lau; Qinghe Cao; John P Hamilton; Honghe Sun; Chenxi Zhou; Lauren Eserman; Dorcus C Gemenet; Bode A Olukolu; Haiyan Wang; Emily Crisovan; Grant T Godden; Chen Jiao; Xin Wang; Mercy Kitavi; Norma Manrique-Carpintero; Brieanne Vaillancourt; Krystle Wiegert-Rininger; Xinsun Yang; Kan Bao; Jennifer Schaff; Jan Kreuze; Wolfgang Gruneberg; Awais Khan; Marc Ghislain; Daifu Ma; Jiming Jiang; Robert O M Mwanga; Jim Leebens-Mack; Lachlan J M Coin; G Craig Yencho; C Robin Buell; Zhangjun Fei
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  6 in total

1.  Biotechnology of the sweetpotato: ensuring global food and nutrition security in the face of climate change.

Authors:  Sang-Soo Kwak
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 2.  Salinity responses and tolerance mechanisms in underground vegetable crops: an integrative review.

Authors:  Kumar Nishant Chourasia; Sanket Jijabrao More; Ashok Kumar; Dharmendra Kumar; Brajesh Singh; Vinay Bhardwaj; Awadhesh Kumar; Sourav Kumar Das; Rajesh Kumar Singh; Gaurav Zinta; Rahul Kumar Tiwari; Milan Kumar Lal
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Genome evolution and diversity of wild and cultivated potatoes.

Authors:  Dié Tang; Yuxin Jia; Jinzhe Zhang; Hongbo Li; Lin Cheng; Pei Wang; Zhigui Bao; Zhihong Liu; Shuangshuang Feng; Xijian Zhu; Dawei Li; Guangtao Zhu; Hongru Wang; Yao Zhou; Yongfeng Zhou; Glenn J Bryan; C Robin Buell; Chunzhi Zhang; Sanwen Huang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 69.504

4.  Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam).

Authors:  Shizhuo Xiao; Pan Xu; Yitong Deng; Xibin Dai; Lukuan Zhao; Bettina Heida; An Zhang; Zhilin Zhou; Qinghe Cao
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  New plastomes of eight Ipomoea species and four putative hybrids from Eastern Amazon.

Authors:  Marcele Laux; Renato R M Oliveira; Santelmo Vasconcelos; Eder S Pires; Talvâne G L Lima; Mayara Pastore; Gisele L Nunes; Ronnie Alves; Guilherme Oliveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Discovery and characterization of sweetpotato's closest tetraploid relative.

Authors:  Pablo Muñoz-Rodríguez; Tom Wells; John R I Wood; Tom Carruthers; Noelle L Anglin; Robert L Jarret; Robert W Scotland
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 10.323

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.