| Literature DB >> 31468128 |
Sachiko Isobe1, Kenta Shirasawa2, Hideki Hirakawa2.
Abstract
The recent advances of next-generation sequencing have made it possible to construct reference genome sequences in divergent species. However, de novo assembly at the chromosome level remains challenging in polyploid species, due to the existence of more than two pairs of homoeologous chromosomes in one nucleus. Cultivated sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) is a hexaploid species with 90 chromosomes (2n = 6X = 90). Although the origin of sweet potato is also still under discussion, diploid relative species, I. trifida and I. triloba have been considered as one of the most possible progenitors. In this manuscript, we review the recent results and activities of whole-genome sequencing in the genus Ipomoea series Batatas, I. trifida, I. triloba and sweet potato (I. batatas). Most of the results of genome assembly suggest that the genomes of sweet potato consist of two pairs and four pairs of subgenomes, i.e., B1B1B2B2B2B2. The results also revealed the relation between sweet potato and other Ipomoea species. Together with the development of bioinformatics approaches, the large-scale publicly available genome and transcript sequence resources and international genome sequencing streams are expected to promote the genome sequence dissection in sweet potato.Entities:
Keywords: Ipomoea; Sequencing; Sweet potato; Whole genome
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31468128 PMCID: PMC6797701 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-019-02464-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Cell Rep ISSN: 0721-7714 Impact factor: 4.570
Assembled nucleic whole genome sequences in genus Ipomoea series Batatas
| Species | Polyploidy | Estimated genome size (Mb) | Heterozygosity | Sequenced line name | Sequence reads | Scaffolds | Pseudo-molecule length (Mb) | Number of predicted genes | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of sequences | Total length (bp) | N50 length (bp) | |||||||||
|
| Diploid | 515.8 | Few | Mx23Hm | Illumina (PE, MP) | 77,400 | 512,990,885 | 42,586 | – | 62,407 | Hirakawa et al. ( |
|
| Diploid | 539.9 | High | 0431-1 | Illumina (PE, MP) | 181,194 | 712,155,587 | 36,283 | – | 109,449 | Hirakawa et al. ( |
|
| Diploid | 526.4 | High | NCNSP0306 | Illumina (PE, MP), PacBio, BioNano (Irys) | 30,394 | 461,997,559 | 1,237,020 | 373.4 | 44,158 | Wu et al. ( |
|
| Diploid | 495.9 | Few | NCNSP0323 | Illumina (PE, MP), PacBio, BioNano (Irys) | 4008 | 457,835,428 | 6,861,300 | 443.3 | 47,008 | Wu et al. ( |
|
| Diploid | 476.4 | High | Y22 | Illumina (PE, MP, SLR), PacBio | 5264 | 460,931,543 | 607,924 | 400.4 | 30,227 | Li et al. ( |
| Sweet potato | Hexaploid | High | Taizhong6 | Illumina (PE, MP), Roche 454 (SE) | 35,919 | 836,316,092 | 200,728 | 633.4 | 78,781 | Yang et al. ( | |
aScaffolds statistics represent haplotype-improved assembly