Literature DB >> 31466895

VR Simulation Leads to Enhanced Procedural Confidence for Surgical Trainees.

Heather Lesch1, Evan Johnson1, Jörg Peters2, Juan C Cendán3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Active learning techniques result in greater knowledge acquisition compared to passive methods. For medical students with limited hands-on operative experiences, virtual reality platforms represent active learning and may enhance procedural training. We hypothesize that virtual reality simulators like Toolkit for Illustration of Procedures in Surgery (TIPS) are a more effective modality in teaching laparoscopic surgical techniques to medical students when compared to passive learning tools like videos.
DESIGN: In this crossover study, participants were randomly assigned to perform either a TIPS laparoscopic appendectomy followed by video of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or video of a laparoscopic appendectomy followed by TIPS laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A knowledge assessment followed each intervention. A postsurvey was used to gather feedback and subjective impressions of the learning experience.
SETTING: University of Central Florida College of Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Second, third, and fourth-year medical students (n = 37).
RESULTS: Validation of the content assessments revealed strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.73). A 2-tailed Fisher's exact test revealed that the video had greater ease of use (p = 0.032), but TIPS had greater utility as a learning tool (p < 0.001) and instilled greater confidence in the ability to reproduce procedural steps (p < 0.001). A 2-tailed t test of the average content quiz scores revealed no significant difference in percentage correct between groups on the laparoscopic appendectomy quiz (p = 0.772), but a difference favoring video learning on the laparoscopic cholecystectomy quiz (p = 0.042)
CONCLUSIONS: Video and TIPS both enhanced different aspects of student learning; however, the active TIPS platform produced greater confidence in the ability to reproduce the steps of the procedure and had greater utility as a learning strategy. Videos are simple to use and can serve a complementary role in curriculum design. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical Knowledge; Patient Care; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Systems-Based Practice; laparoscopic training; surgical education; surgical simulation; virtual reality-based education

Year:  2019        PMID: 31466895      PMCID: PMC8041454          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  19 in total

1.  Developing a multimedia environment for customized teaching of an adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Juan Cendan; Minho Kim; Sergei Kurenov; Jorg Peters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Reply letter to: Letter to the editor on the article "Virtual reality simulator versus box-trainer to teach minimally invasive procedures: A meta-analysis".

Authors:  H G Guedes; Z M C C Ferreira; L R S Leão; E F S Montero; J P Otoch; E L A Artifon
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 3.  Taxonomy of educational objectives and learning theories in the training of laparoscopic surgical techniques in a simulation environment.

Authors:  Grijalva Otávio Ferreira da Costa; Hermano Alexandre Lima Rocha; Luiz Gonzaga de Moura Júnior; Francisco das Chagas Medeiros
Journal:  Rev Col Bras Cir       Date:  2018-10-18

4.  American College of surgeons /Association for Surgical Education Medical Student Simulation-based Surgical Skills Curriculum: Alignment with Entrustable Professional Activities.

Authors:  Susan Steinemann; Aimee Gardner; Tess Aulet; Shimae Fitzgibbons; Andre Campbell; Robert Acton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  A Systematic Review of the Educational Effectiveness of Simulation Used in Open Surgery.

Authors:  Leonie Heskin; Ciaran Simms; Jane Holland; Oscar Traynor; Rose Galvin
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 6.  Simulation and its role in training.

Authors:  Hoda Samia; Sadaf Khan; Justin Lawrence; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

7.  Cricothyroidotomy In Situ Simulation Curriculum (CRIC Study): Training Residents for Rare Procedures.

Authors:  Andrew Petrosoniak; Agnes Ryzynski; Gerald Lebovic; Karen Woolfrey
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 8.  Surgical simulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leanne M Sutherland; Philippa F Middleton; Adrian Anthony; Jeffrey Hamdorf; Patrick Cregan; David Scott; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A comparison of faculty and resident perception of resident learning needs in the operating room.

Authors:  Carla M Pugh; Debra A DaRosa; Dennis Glenn; Richard H Bell
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  When to Introduce Three-Dimensional Visualization Technology into Surgical Residency: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Chen Lin; Junyi Gao; Hua Zheng; Jun Zhao; Hua Yang; Yue Zheng; Yihan Cao; Yufei Chen; Guoliang Wu; Guole Lin; Jianchun Yu; Hanzhong Li; Hui Pan; Quan Liao; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 4.460

View more
  6 in total

1.  Remote and asynchronous training network: from a SAGES grant to an eight-country remote laparoscopic simulation training program.

Authors:  María Inés Gaete; Francisca Belmar; Matías Cortés; Adnan Alseidi; Domenech Asbun; Valentina Durán; Gabriel Escalona; Pablo Achurra; Ignacio Villagrán; Fernando Crovari; Fernando Pimentel; Julián Varas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Outcomes, Measurement Instruments, and Their Validity Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Medical Education: Systematic Mapping Review.

Authors:  Lorainne Tudor Car; Bhone Myint Kyaw; Andrew Teo; Tatiana Erlikh Fox; Sunitha Vimalesvaran; Christian Apfelbacher; Sandra Kemp; Niels Chavannes
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.364

Review 3.  Virtual Simulation in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review of Recent Practice.

Authors:  Qingming Wu; Yubin Wang; Lili Lu; Yong Chen; Hui Long; Jun Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-30

4.  Home Surgical Skill Training Resources for Obstetrics and Gynecology Trainees During a Pandemic.

Authors:  Sarah Hoopes; Truce Pham; Fiona M Lindo; Danielle D Antosh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 7.623

5.  Virtual Reality as a Portable Alternative to Chromotherapy Rooms for Stress Relief: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Miguel A Vaquero-Blasco; Eduardo Perez-Valero; Miguel Angel Lopez-Gordo; Christian Morillas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Virtual Reality in Medical Students' Education: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Haowen Jiang; Sunitha Vimalesvaran; Jeremy King Wang; Kee Boon Lim; Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali; Lorainne Tudor Car
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2022-02-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.