Literature DB >> 31466890

Use of 3D Printed Models to Create Molds for Shaping Implants for Surgical Repair of Orbital Fractures.

William J Weadock1, Curtis J Heisel2, Alon Kahana3, John Kim4.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Surgical repair of an isolated orbital fracture requires anatomically accurate implant shape and placement. We describe a three-dimensional (3D) printing technique to customize the shape of commercially available absorbable implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our early experience with three cases in which 3D printed molds were utilized for fracture repair. The institution's medical records were reviewed to assess operative time for orbital floor blow-out fracture repairs. Thin section computed tomography (CT) images were loaded into a clinical 3D visualization software, and stereolithography models were created. The models were loaded into stereolithography editing software in which the nonfractured side was mirrored and overlaid with the fractured side. Sterilizable 3D printed molds were created using the fracture images as well as the virtual mirrored images. The molds were taken to the operating room and used to shape a customized orbital implant for fracture repair, using off-the-shelf bioabsorbable implants.
RESULTS: The three patients treated using 3D printed molds had excellent outcomes, with decreased postoperative edema and rapid resolution of ocular misalignment/strabismus. Surgical times were decreased from an average of 93.3 minutes using standard implants to 48.3 minutes following adoption of 3D printed molds.
CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional printed models can be used to create molds for shaping bioabsorbable implants for customized surgical repair, improving fit, reducing tissue handling and postoperative edema, and reducing surgical times.
Copyright © 2019 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Bioabsorbable implant; Blow-out; Orbit fracture; Orbital floor

Year:  2019        PMID: 31466890     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  5 in total

Review 1.  3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Adeeb Zoabi; Idan Redenski; Daniel Oren; Adi Kasem; Asaf Zigron; Shadi Daoud; Liad Moskovich; Fares Kablan; Samer Srouji
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  3D Printed Models for Teaching Orbital Anatomy, Anomalies and Fractures.

Authors:  Roya Vatankhah; Ali Emadzadeh; Sirous Nekooei; Bahar Tafaghodi Yousefi; Majid Khadem Rezaiyan; Hossein Karimi Moonaghi; Mohammad Etezad Razavi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2021-10-25

Review 3.  Low-Cost Cranioplasty-A Systematic Review of 3D Printing in Medicine.

Authors:  Wojciech Czyżewski; Jakub Jachimczyk; Zofia Hoffman; Michał Szymoniuk; Jakub Litak; Marcin Maciejewski; Krzysztof Kura; Radosław Rola; Kamil Torres
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Orbital Bony Reconstruction With Presized and Precontoured Porous Polyethylene-Titanium Implants.

Authors:  Nathan W Blessing; Andrew J Rong; Brian C Tse; Benjamin P Erickson; Bradford W Lee; Thomas E Johnson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021 May-Jun 01       Impact factor: 2.011

Review 5.  3D Printing in Eye Care.

Authors:  Ryan D Larochelle; Scott E Mann; Cristos Ifantides
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-07-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.