Literature DB >> 32976336

Orbital Bony Reconstruction With Presized and Precontoured Porous Polyethylene-Titanium Implants.

Nathan W Blessing1,2, Andrew J Rong1, Brian C Tse1, Benjamin P Erickson1,3, Bradford W Lee1, Thomas E Johnson1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Complex bony orbital defects are reconstructively challenging due to loss of intraoperative anatomical landmarks and adjacent support. Presized and precontoured porous polyethylene-titanium implants (Medpor Titan 3D Orbital Floor Implant) are designed to reestablish normal orbital floor and medial wall anatomy and are modeled after anatomically averaged orbits. This is the first study to report clinical outcomes with this implant.
METHODS: This retrospective case series reviewed clinical data and outcomes for patients undergoing orbital reconstruction with a presized and precontoured porous polyethylene-titanium orbital implant from January 2016 to June 2018.
RESULTS: A total of 34 orbits of 33 patients were identified (mean age: 43 ± 16 years, 70% men). Most bony defects were a result of trauma and included large orbital floor deformities (100%), medial wall defects (74%), disrupted inferomedial struts (68%), and broken posterior ledges (82%). Symptomatic diplopia (73%) and enophthalmos (89%, mean: 3.7 ± 2.1 mm) were common preoperatively. Many cases were revisions (44%). Mean follow up was 7.8 ± 6.7 months. All patients had improved globe positioning, enophthalmos, and hypoglobus. Seven patients had persistent postoperative diplopia: 6 responded to prism therapy and 1 required strabismus surgery. One patient required retrobulbar hematoma drainage and 1 patient required implant explantation due to chronic infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available presized and precon toured porous polyethylene-titanium implants are useful for complex orbital bony defects and can achieve functional improve ments in diplopia, enophthalmos, and extraocular motility with a low incidence of postoperative complications or revisional surgery.
Copyright © 2021 The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32976336      PMCID: PMC7982351          DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0740-9303            Impact factor:   2.011


  22 in total

1.  Combined use of titanium mesh and resorbable PLLA-PGA implant in the treatment of large orbital floor fractures.

Authors:  Fernando González Magaña; Rodrigo Menéndez Arzac; Laura De Hilario Avilés
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Incidence of diplopia after division and reattachment of the inferior oblique muscle during orbital fracture repair.

Authors:  Ramzi M Alameddine; Jeffrey Z Tsao; Audrey C Ko; Bradford W Lee; Don O Kikkawa; Bobby S Korn
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Low-Cost 3D Printing Orbital Implant Templates in Secondary Orbital Reconstructions.

Authors:  Alison B Callahan; Ashley A Campbell; Carisa Petris; Michael Kazim
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 1.746

4.  Orbital fracture repair outcomes with preformed titanium mesh implants and comparison to porous polyethylene coated titanium sheets.

Authors:  Michelle Y Peng; Shannath L Merbs; Michael P Grant; Nicholas R Mahoney
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  Evidence-based medicine: Orbital floor fractures.

Authors:  Michael S Gart; Arun K Gosain
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Combined orbital floor and medial wall fractures involving the inferomedial strut: repair technique and case series using preshaped porous polyethylene/titanium implants.

Authors:  Raymond I Cho; Brett W Davies
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-05-31

7.  Preformed vs intraoperative bending of titanium mesh for orbital reconstruction.

Authors:  E Bradley Strong; Scott C Fuller; David F Wiley; Janina Zumbansen; M D Wilson; Marc C Metzger
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Orbital adherence syndrome secondary to titanium implant material.

Authors:  Hui Bae Harold Lee; William R Nunery
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.746

9.  Use of porous polyethylene with embedded titanium in orbital reconstruction: a review of 106 patients.

Authors:  Daniel C Garibaldi; Nicholas T Iliff; Michael P Grant; Shannath L Merbs
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.746

10.  Surgical Correction of Diplopia in Orbital Fracture: Influence of Material and Design.

Authors:  S M Balaji; Preetha Balaji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jan-Jun
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction-An Overview.

Authors:  Victor A Vasile; Sinziana Istrate; Raluca C Iancu; Roxana M Piticescu; Laura M Cursaru; Leopold Schmetterer; Gerhard Garhöfer; Alina Popa Cherecheanu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.623

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.