| Literature DB >> 31466367 |
Lina Adomaitienė1, Rūta Nadišauskienė2, Mahshid Nickkho-Amiry3, Arvydas Čižauskas4, Jolita Palubinskienė5, Cathrine Holland3, Mourad W Seif3.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Endometrial polyps in asymptomatic postmenopausal women are often incidentally found, yet only 1.51% of them are malignant. Their potential for malignant transformation has not been adequately addressed. The aim of this study was to investigate the proliferation within endometrial polyps as one of the indicators of their malignization potential in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Ki-67; endometrial polyps; malignancy; postmenopausal; proliferation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31466367 PMCID: PMC6780687 DOI: 10.3390/medicina55090543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Figure 1(A) A case of postmenopausal benign polyp. (B) A case of premenopausal benign polyp. (C) A case of atrophic endometrium. (D) A case of endometrial cancer. Original magnification 40× (A–D).
Clinicopathologic and demographic characteristics of malignant endometrial polyps.
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Demographics | |
| Age | |
| <60 | 2 (16.7) |
| ≥60 | 10 (83.3) |
| Vaginal bleeding | |
| No | 4 (33.3) |
| Yes | 8 (66.7) |
| Pathological classification | |
| Endometrioid adenocarcinoma | 12 (100.0) |
| Surgical-pathological staging | |
| IA | 12 (100.0) |
| IB | 0 (0.0) |
| Differentiation degree | |
| High (G1) | 7 (58.3) |
| Moderate (G2) | 4 (33.3) |
| Poor (G3) | 1 (8.4) |
| Depth of myometrial invasion | |
| Absent | 7 (58.3) |
| <1/2 | 5 (41.7) |
| ≥1/2 | 0 (0.0) |
| Endometrial carcinoma (EC) confined to a polyp | |
| Yes | 7 (58.3) |
| No | 5 (41.7) |
Ki-67 percentage in different endometrial lesions.
| Histology Type | N | Ki-67 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (IQR), % | |||||
| Epithelial | Stromal | ||||
| Postmenopausal benign polyps | 52 | 4.7 (3.2–7.8) | 0.05 (0.02–0.08) | - | - |
| Premenopausal benign polyps | 32 | 11.4 (5.0–17.6) | 0.12 (0.05–0.30) |
|
|
| Endometrial cancer: | 35 | 8.3 (2.2–37.0) | 0.43 (0.13–1.79) |
|
|
| EC with coexisting benign polyps: | 19 | ||||
| Polyps | 4.4 (2.1–8.8) | 0.03 (0.01–0.06) | 0.886 | 0.071 | |
| EC | 33.5 (10.7–76.4) | 1.08 (0.48–2.59) |
|
| |
| Polyps with foci of EC: | 12 | ||||
| Polyp tissue | 4.6 (1.8–7.8) | 0.05 (0.02–0.11) | 0.711 | 0.986 | |
| EC focus | 2.8 (1.7–5.4) | 0.18 (0.04–0.37) | 0.171 |
| |
| Patients who had EP and later developed EC: | 4 | ||||
| Polyps | 4 | 1.3 (1.1–2.4) | 0.02 (0.02–0.04) |
| 0.098 |
| Later developed EC | 4 | 1.9 (1.5–4.9) | 0.28 (0.06–0.44) | 0.242 |
|
| Atrophic endometrium | 31 | 2.4 (0.4–3.6) | 0.01 (0.00–0.02) |
|
|
* Compared with asymptomatic postmenopausal endometrial polyps (Mann Whitney U test). Abbreviations: EC, endometrial carcinoma; EP, endometrial polyps; IQR, interquartile range. Bold values denote statistical significance at the p < 0.05 level.
Figure 2Box and whisker plots showing epithelial (a) and stromal (b) expression of Ki-67 over the spectrum of endometrial lesions. Boxes extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles and whiskers mark the range. Medians are displayed as horizontal lines within the boxes. The circles and asterisks represent points more than 1.5 IQR (interquartile range) and 3 IQR from the nearer quartile, respectively. Abbreviations: PostM EP, postmenopausal benign endometrial polyps. PremM EP, premenopausal benign endometrial polyps. EC, endometrial cancer. Malignant EP, endometrial polyps including polyp tissue of cases where polyp was found with coexisting endometrial cancer or had carcinoma focus inside.
Figure 3Box and whisker plot showing epithelial expression of Ki-67 over the spectrum of endometrial lesions in selected cases. Boxes extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles and whiskers mark the range. Medians are displayed as horizontal lines within the boxes. The circles and asterisks represent points more than 1.5 IQR and 3 IQR from the nearer quartile, respectively. *, p < 0.05. Abbreviations: PostM, postmenopausal polyps. EP, endometrial polyp. EC, endometrial carcinoma. a—cases of endometrial carcinoma with coexisting benign endometrial polyps; b—cases of endometrial polyps with foci of endometrial carcinoma; c—cases of endometrial polyps and later developed endometrial carcinoma.
Figure 4Comparison of Ki-67 scores according to staging (a) and histodifferentation (b). Boxes extend from 25th to 75th percentiles and whiskers mark the range. Medians are displayed as horizontal lines within the boxes. The circles are points more than 1.5 IQR from the nearer quartile. Abbreviations: FIGO, The International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
Figure 5Immunohistochemical staining with Ki-67 in different grades of histodifferentation. G1: high differentiation degree. G2: moderate differentiation degree. G3: poor differentiation degree.