| Literature DB >> 31466264 |
Irene Escribano-López1, Aranzazu M de Marañon1, Francesca Iannantuoni1, Sandra López-Domènech1, Zaida Abad-Jiménez1, Pedro Díaz1, Eva Solá1, Nadezda Apostolova2, Milagros Rocha3,4, Víctor M Víctor5,6,7.
Abstract
Mitochondrial dysfunction has been shown to play a central role in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes (T2D), and mitochondria-targeted agents such as SS-31 are emerging as a promising strategy for its treatment. We aimed to study the effects of SS-31 on leukocytes from T2D patients by evaluating oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and autophagy. Sixty-one T2D patients and 53 controls were included. Anthropometric and analytical measurements were performed. We also assessed reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, calcium content, the expression of ER stress markers GRP78, CHOP, P-eIF2α, and autophagy-related proteins Beclin1, LC3 II/I, and p62 in leukocytes from T2D and control subjects treated or not with SS-31. Furthermore, we have evaluated the action of SS-31 on leukocyte-endothelium interactions. T2D patients exhibited elevated ROS concentration, calcium levels and presence of ER markers (GRP78 and CHOP gene expression, and GRP78 and P-eIF2α protein expression), all of which were reduced by SS-31 treatment. SS-31 also led to a drop in BECN1 gene expression, and Beclin1 and LC3 II/I protein expression in T2D patients. In contrast, the T2D group displayed reduced p62 protein levels that were restored by SS-31. SS-20 (with non-antioxidant activity) did not change any analyzed parameter. In addition, SS-31 decreased rolling flux and leukocyte adhesion, and increased rolling velocity in T2D patients. Our findings suggest that SS-31 exerts potentially beneficial effects on leukocytes of T2D patients modulating oxidative stress and autophagy, and ameliorating ER stress.Entities:
Keywords: Mitochondria; SS-31; autophagy; endoplasmic reticulum stress; oxidative stress; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2019 PMID: 31466264 PMCID: PMC6780723 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8091322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Protocol details and primer sequences.
|
| ||||
| Temperature | 95 °C | 95 °C | 60 °C | Melting |
| Time | 10 min | 10 s | 30 s | Curve |
| No. of Cycles | 1 | 40 | ||
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Forward | CCCCAGAACAGTATAACGGCA | ||
| Reverse | AGACTGTGTTGCTGCTCCAT | |||
|
| Forward | AAGAACCAGCTCACCTCCAACCC | ||
| Reverse | TTCAACCACCTTGAACGGCAA | |||
|
| Forward | AGAACCAGGAAACGGAAACAGA | ||
| Reverse | TCTCCTTCATGCGCTGCTTT | |||
|
| Forward | CGCATCTTCTTTTGCGTCG | ||
| Reverse | TTGAGGTCAATGAAGGGGTCA | |||
|
| Forward | GATTCGCCGCTTCAGCTTCTG | ||
| Reverse | CTGGAAAAGGCAACCAAGTCC | |||
Anthropometric and analytical parameters.
| Control | Type 2 Diabetes | BMI-Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 53 | 61 | - | - |
| Male (%) | 47.2 | 52.5 | ns | ns |
| Age (years) | 51.7 ± 9.3 | 55.1 ± 10.2 | ns | ns |
| Weight (Kg) | 72.9 ± 18.8 | 85.6 ± 15.5 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.8 ± 5.4 | 31.4 ± 5.6 | - | |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 85.8 ± 13.2 | 104.0 ± 11.9 | ||
| SBP (mmHg) | 23.3 ± 19.7 | 145.8 ± 14.8 | ||
| DBP (mmHg) | 73.6 ± 10.9 | 74.2 ± 25.6 | ns | ns |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 95.6 ± 13.6 | 154.0 ± 49.8 | ||
| Insulin (µUI/mL) | 7.56 ± 3.55 | 16.27 ± 9.09 | ||
| HOMA-IR | 1.71 ± 0.95 | 6.23 ± 4.64 | ||
| HbA1c (%) | 5.32 ± 0.36 | 7.42 ± 1.57 | ||
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 198.8 ± 35.5 | 168.0 ± 37.7 | ||
| HDL-c (mg/dL) | 57.3 ± 19.9 | 43.1 ± 9.2 | ||
| LDL-c (mg/dL) | 122.1 ± 28.9 | 93.7 ± 30.6 | ||
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 93.0 (26.5–150.5) | 133.0 (94.0–170.0) | ||
| hs-CRP (mg/L) | 1.17 (0.46–2.40) | 2.92 (1.88–6.39) |
Data are shown as mean ± SD and were compared by a Student’s t test for parametric variables, while they are shown as median and were compared by a Mann–Whitney U test (25th and 75th percentiles) for non-parametric variables. A univariate general linear model was used to adjust changes for BMI. A Chi-Square test was used to compare proportions among groups. ns: not significant.
Figure 1Effects of Szeto–Schiller (SS)-31 (30 min, 100 nM) on total and mitochondrial ROS production, and calcium levels in leukocytes from type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients and healthy subjects. (A) reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, measured as deacetylated by endogenous hydrolases to a form (DCFH)-DA fluorescence. (B) Mitochondrial ROS production, assessed as MitoSOX fluorescence. (C) Calcium levels, determined as Fluo-4 fluorescence. Representative fluorescence microscopy images are also shown. (D) Analysis of total ROS levels, measured as DCFH-DA fluorescence in leukocytes from healthy subjects upon a positive control treatment (rotenone, ROT) in the presence or absence of SS-31 or catalase (CAT) and representative cytograms of the 4 groups stained with APC-CD45 and DCFH-DA. 10,000 cells were analyzed in each experiment. n = 6. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 with regard to control group; ## p < 0.01 ### p < 0.001 vs. non-treated T2D group; a p < 0.05 vs. rotenone treatment.
Figure 2Evaluation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress parameters in leukocytes from T2D patients and controls in the absence and presence of SS-31 (30 min, 100 nM) (A) GRP78 expression. (B) DDIT3/CHOP expression. (C) GRP78 protein levels and representative western blotting (WB) images. (D) P-eIF2α protein levels and representative WB images. * p < 0.05 with regard to control group # p < 0.05 vs. non-treated T2D group.
Figure 3Study of autophagy-related parameters in leukocytes from control subjects and T2D patients in the presence and absence of SS-31 (30 min, 100 nM). (A) BECN1 expression. (B) Beclin 1 protein expression and representative WB images. (C) SQSTM1/p62 expression (D) p62 protein expression and representative WB images (E) LC3 II/I ratio of protein expression and representative WB images. * p < 0.05 with regard to control group, # p < 0.05 vs. non-treated T2D group.
Figure 4Study of the expression of protein markers of ER stress and autophagy, induced pharmacologically in leukocytes from healthy controls, in the presence and absence of SS-31 (30 min, 100 nM). (A) GRP78, (B) P-eIF2α, (C) Beclin1, (D) LC3 II/I ratio, and (E) p62. Representative WB images are also shown. * p < 0.05 with regard to control group; a p < 0.05 vs. rotenone-treated group. n = 6. ROT, rotenone (50 µM, 20 min); TG, thapsigargin (1 µM, 20 min); RAPA, rapamycin (0.5 µM, 30 min).