Literature DB >> 31463878

Attitudes of robotic surgery educators and learners: challenges, advantages, tips and tricks of teaching and learning robotic surgery.

S R Turner1,2, J Mormando3,4, B J Park3, J Huang3.   

Abstract

As the application of robotic surgical technology grows, so does the need to instruct surgical residents in robotic techniques. To better understand the challenges and benefits unique to robotic surgery education, this study explored the attitudes of teachers and learners. A 43-item questionnaire was developed with five domains: challenges and benefits of robotic education, training methodologies, trainees' readiness for learning, and education tips. This was delivered to surgeons and surgical fellows at a high-volume surgical department. 31 surgeons and 25 fellows from 7 specialties responded (response rate 70% and 43%). The teaching and learning of robotic surgery were perceived as superior to traditional minimally invasive surgery by both surgeons (in 7/9 factors studied) and fellows (7/9), but was seen as mostly disadvantageous compared to open surgery by both surgeons (in 6/9 factors studied) and fellows (8/9). Surgeons frequently stated the greatest challenge to teaching robotics was the need to relinquish total control to the trainee. Robotic surgery education is generally well received and offers several advantages. However, teaching robotic surgery presents unique challenges, especially when compared to open surgery. Understanding the benefits of, and barriers to, robotic surgery education may help develop more effective training paradigms that are responsive to educational needs while maintaining patient safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Curriculum; Minimally invasive surgery; Resident; Robotic surgery; Simulation; Surgical education

Year:  2019        PMID: 31463878     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01013-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  5 in total

1.  Training for next generation surgeons: a pilot study of robot-assisted hysterectomy managed by resident using dual console.

Authors:  Clémence Klapczynski; Camille Sallée; Antoine Tardieu; Clémence Peschot; Manon Boutot; Nadia Mohand; Aymeline Lacorre; François Margueritte; Tristan Gauthier
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 2.  [Robot-assisted head and neck surgery].

Authors:  P J Schuler; F Boehm; L R Schild; J Greve; T K Hoffmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum.

Authors:  Jill M Collins; Danielle S Walsh; John Hudson; Shakira Henderson; Julie Thompson; Michael Zychowicz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-08-26

4.  Current status of robotic surgery in colorectal residency training programs.

Authors:  Adam D Shellito; Sonam Kapadia; Amy H Kaji; Cynthia M Tom; Christine Dauphine; Beverley A Petrie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Virtual classroom proficiency-based progression for robotic surgery training (VROBOT): a randomised, prospective, cross-over, effectiveness study.

Authors:  Arjun Nathan; Sonam Patel; Maria Georgi; Monty Fricker; Aqua Asif; Alexander Ng; William Mullins; Man Kien Hang; Alexander Light; Senthil Nathan; Nader Francis; John Kelly; Justin Collins; Ashwin Sridhar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-10-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.