Kevin Kadakia1,2, Cory M Pfeifer3, Joseph Cao1, Ellen J O'Connell4,5, Jeannie Kwon1, Travis Browning1,5. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Dr, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. Cory.Pfeifer@utsouthwestern.edu. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. 5. Parkland Health and Hospital System, 5200 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to study the effect of providing scorecards to emergency department providers to assess its effect on changes in utilization. METHODS: CT of the abdomen and pelvis, CT angiogram of the chest for pulmonary embolism, and CT of the head were targeted due to ordering variability, cost, and radiation exposure. The utilization rate for each provider was assessed for emergency department providers. Following this, providers were given scorecards regarding their utilization as well as their relative utilization compared with each other. Utilization was then monitored following the intervention to assess the effect of the scorecard on ordering practices. RESULTS: No significant effect on the utilization of these 3 exams was found after the scorecard intervention. CONCLUSION: Providing scorecards to make emergency department providers aware of their relative utilization does not significantly alter ordering behavior. Incentive-based systems may be required in order to lessen overutilization of these 3 commonly ordered radiology procedures in the emergency department.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to study the effect of providing scorecards to emergency department providers to assess its effect on changes in utilization. METHODS: CT of the abdomen and pelvis, CT angiogram of the chest for pulmonary embolism, and CT of the head were targeted due to ordering variability, cost, and radiation exposure. The utilization rate for each provider was assessed for emergency department providers. Following this, providers were given scorecards regarding their utilization as well as their relative utilization compared with each other. Utilization was then monitored following the intervention to assess the effect of the scorecard on ordering practices. RESULTS: No significant effect on the utilization of these 3 exams was found after the scorecard intervention. CONCLUSION: Providing scorecards to make emergency department providers aware of their relative utilization does not significantly alter ordering behavior. Incentive-based systems may be required in order to lessen overutilization of these 3 commonly ordered radiology procedures in the emergency department.
Authors: Hannah J Wong; Chris L Sistrom; Theodore I Benzer; Elkan F Halpern; Dante J Morra; G Scott Gazelle; Timothy G Ferris; Jeffrey B Weilburg Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: William R Hendee; Gary J Becker; James P Borgstede; Jennifer Bosma; William J Casarella; Beth A Erickson; C Douglas Maynard; James H Thrall; Paul E Wallner Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jarone Lee; C Scott Evans; Neil Singh; Jonathan Kirschner; Daniel Runde; David Newman; Dan Wiener; Josh Quaas; Kaushal Shah Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2012-12-19
Authors: Lauren M Westafer; Ashley Kunz; Patrycja Bugajska; Amber Hughes; Kathleen M Mazor; Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Mihaela S Stefan; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 3.451