Literature DB >> 31463120

Clinical utility of robot-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy in advanced esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Jae Kwang Yun1, In-Seob Lee2, Chung-Sik Gong2, Bum Soo Kim2, Hyeong Ryul Kim1, Dong Kwan Kim1, Seung-Il Park1, Yong-Hee Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although robot-assisted minimally-invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) surgeries are expanding clinically, few studies have reported patients with locally-advanced esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT).
METHODS: From 2013 to 2017, 219 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent RAMIE and 35 of them received nCRT at our institution. During the period, 289 patients underwent conventional open esophagectomy (OE) and 111 patients underwent nCRT. We compared postoperative mortality and morbidity of RAMIE and OE patients after nCRT.
RESULTS: In patients who received nCRT, the RAMIE and OE groups had similar operative time, estimated blood loss, early-period mortality, and recurrence rate (≤1 year) and both groups showed a high rate of complete resection. With respect to postoperative morbidities, such as anastomotic leakage, chylothorax, postoperative bleeding, and wound infection, only vasopressor use was significantly higher in the OE group (P<0.001). The RAMIE group had a lower, but not statistically significant, postoperative pneumonia incidence than the OE group (5.7% vs. 13.5%, P=0.341).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who received nCRT for locally-advanced esophageal cancer, RAMIE is safe and feasible with comparable postoperative mortality and morbidity to conventional OE. Patients with advanced-stage esophageal cancer who received nCRT may be surgical candidates for RAMIE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal neoplasms; esophagectomy; minimally invasive surgical procedures; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; robotic surgical procedures

Year:  2019        PMID: 31463120      PMCID: PMC6688028          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  22 in total

1.  Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system.

Authors:  M Hashizume; M Shimada; M Tomikawa; Y Ikeda; I Takahashi; R Abe; F Koga; N Gotoh; K Konishi; S Maehara; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Enzinger; Robert J Mayer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons general thoracic surgery databases: joint standardization of variable definitions and terminology.

Authors:  Felix G Fernandez; Pierre E Falcoz; Benjamin D Kozower; Michele Salati; Cameron D Wright; Alessandro Brunelli
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position.

Authors:  Dae Joon Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Chang Young Lee; Jin-Gu Lee; Seok Jin Haam; In-Kyu Park; Kyung Young Chung
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery.

Authors:  S R Craig; H A Leaver; P L Yap; G C Pugh; W S Walker
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure.

Authors:  I Nagahiro; A Andou; M Aoe; Y Sano; H Date; N Shimizu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy using a four-arm platform: experience, technique and cautions during early procedure development.

Authors:  Inderpal S Sarkaria; Nabil P Rizk; David J Finley; Manjit S Bains; Prasad S Adusumilli; James Huang; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 9.  Impact of the 7th Edition AJCC staging classification on the NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology for gastric and esophageal cancers.

Authors:  Vivian E Strong; Thomas A D'Amico; Lawrence Kleinberg; Jaffer Ajani
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation-Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Ashish Goel; Vikash Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-25

Review 2.  Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stepan M Esagian; Ioannis A Ziogas; Konstantinos Skarentzos; Ioannis Katsaros; Georgios Tsoulfas; Daniela Molena; Michalis V Karamouzis; Ioannis Rouvelas; Magnus Nilsson; Dimitrios Schizas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao Zheng; Xiao-Kun Li; Chi Zhang; Hai Zhou; Sai-Guang Ji; Ji-Hong Zhong; Yang Xu; Zhuang-Zhuang Cong; Gao-Ming Wang; Wen-Jie Wu; Yi Shen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Tumor regression grade combined with lymph node status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jae Kwang Yun; Youngwoong Kim; Geun Dong Lee; Sehoon Choi; Yong-Hee Kim; Dong Kwan Kim; Seung-Il Park; Hyeong Ryul Kim
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 4.711

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.