| Literature DB >> 31461751 |
Hanaa Elgamily1, Engie Safwat1, Zainab Soliman2, Heba Salama3, Hoda El-Sayed3, Mohamed Anwar2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article evaluates the antibacterial and remineralization potential of experimentally prepared toothpastes containing different mixtures of nano casein phosphopeptides (nCPP), nano amorphous calcium phosphate (nACP), probiotic - Lactobacillus rhamnosus B-445 (L. rhamnosus), and nano glycomacropeptide (nGMP).Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31461751 PMCID: PMC6890513 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Dent
The mean, standard deviation (SD) values of overall inhibition zone results for all groups
| Variables | Overall Inhibition zone diameter (mm) | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | Standard deviation | |
| Abbreviations: ACP, amorphous calcium phosphate; CPP, casein phosphopeptide; GMP, glycomacropeptide. | ||
| A0 (base) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| A1 (CPP) | 8.10 b. | 2.7 |
| A2 (CPP/ACP) | 10.4 b | 2.7 |
| A3 (CPP/ACP/Probiotic) | 17.1 a | 1.9 |
| A4 (CPP/ACP/GMP) | 15.9 a | 2.2 |
| A5 (Commercial) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
|
| ≤ 0.001* | |
The mean, standard deviation (SD) of microhardness in different groups
|
| VHN | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | After demineralization | After treatment 7 d | After treatment 15 d |
| |||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Abbreviations: ACP, amorphous calcium phosphate; CPP, casein phosphopeptide; GMP, glycomacropeptide; VHN, Vickers hardness number. | |||||||||
| A0 (base) | 177.7 Aa | 37.4 | 63.3 Ab | 20.7 | 64.4 Ab | 16.6 | 58.1 Ab | 16.6 | < 0.001* |
| A1 (CPP) | 182.3 Aa | 46.9 | 41.5 Ab | 13.5 | 83.4 Bb | 18.4 | 78.4 Ab | 21.1 | < 0.001* |
| A2 (CPP/ACP) | 195.9 Aa | 49.2 | 48.4 Ac | 18.8 | 100.9 Bb | 16.5 | 124.5 Bb | 16.05 | < 0.001* |
| A3 (CPP/ACP/Probiotic) | 253.2 Ba | 30.9 | 63.9 Ac | 19.7 | 117.4 Cb | 12.9 | 125.8 Bb | 18.8 | < 0.001* |
| A4 (CPP/ACP/GMP) | 276.6 Ba | 42.9 | 54.7 Ac | 15.1 | 81.5 Bc | 14.5 | 149.9 Cb | 13.2 | 0.0032* |
| A5 (Commercial) | 265.3 Ba | 34.9 | 47.2 Ad | 13.4 | 85.7 Bc | 8.4 | 130.6 Bb | 17.1 | < 0.001* |
|
| 0.01* | 0.09ns | < 0.013* | 0.008* | |||||
Fig. 1Bar chart representing the amount of increase in the Vickers hardness number (VHN) values after 15 days’ remineralization period.
Fig. 2( A ) The baseline of normal bovine enamel sample. ( B ) Demineralized enamel. ( C ) Remineralized enamel exhibiting precipitation of a few numbers of white nanoparticles on the dentinal tubules orifices after 15 days’ treatment using (A3) toothpaste at magnification (1, 000×). ( D ) Remineralized enamel exhibiting precipitation of a few numbers of white nanoparticles on the dentinal tubules orifices after 15 days’ treatment using (A3) toothpaste at magnification (2,000×).
Fig. 3( A ) The baseline of normal bovine enamel sample. (B) Demineralized enamel. ( C ). Remineralized enamel exhibiting precipitation of multiple numbers of white nanoparticles on the dentinal tubules orifices after 15 days’ treatment using (A4) toothpaste at magnification (1,000×). ( D ) Remineralized enamel exhibiting precipitation of multiple numbers of white nanoparticles on the dentinal tubules orifices after 15 days’ treatment using (A4) toothpaste at magnification (2,000×).