| Literature DB >> 31461663 |
Olga Jovanović1, Sanja Škulj2, Elena E Pohl3, Mario Vazdar4.
Abstract
Reactive aldehydes (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31461663 PMCID: PMC7115857 DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.08.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Free Radic Biol Med ISSN: 0891-5849 Impact factor: 7.376
Lipid bilayer compositions used in MD simulations.
| Bilayer composition | Name | Number of molecules |
|---|---|---|
| DOPC:DOPE | PC:PE | 64/64 |
| DOPC:HNE-Michael adduct | MA-HNE | 64/64 |
| DOPC:HNE-Schiff base adduct | SB-HNE | 64/64 |
| DOPC:ONE-Schiff base adduct | SB-ONE | 64/64 |
| DOPC:HNE-double Michael adduct | D-MA-HNE | 64/64 |
| DOPC:HNE-double Schiff adduct | D-SB-HNE | 64/64 |
Fig. 3A. Chemical structures of DOPE adducts of HNE and ONE. B. Proposed reaction mechanism for HNE-double Michael adduct and HNE-double Schiff adduct formation. R stands for the rest of the DOPE lipid molecule.
Fig. 1Effect of reactive aldehydes (HNE and ONE) on total membrane conductance (Gm). The lipid compositions of bilayer membranes were: DOPC:CL (90:10 mol%), DOPE:DOPC:CL (45:45:10 mol%), and E. coli polar lipid (PE:PG:CL, 71.4:23.4:5.2 mol%). The buffer solution contained 50 mM Na2SO4, 10 mM MES, and 10 mM TRIS at 32 °C and pH = 7.32. The concentrations of lipids and RAs were 1.2 mg/ml and 0.84 mM, respectively.
Fig. 2Influence of HNE-DOPE adducts on Na+ and H+ translocation. A. Representative current-voltage measurements in the presence (grey triangles) and absence (white dots) of a pH gradient of 0.4. The voltage shift is the difference in the x-axis intersection values of both measurements. The membranes were composed of DOPE:DOPC:CL (45:45:10 mol%). The buffer solution contained 50 mM Na2SO4, 10 mM MES, 10 mM TRIS, and 0.6 mM EGTA at 32°C and pH=7.32. B. Influence of the ionic strength of the buffer solution on total membrane conductance (Gm) in the presence of HNE or ONE. The membrane were composed of DOPE:DOPC (50:50 mol%). Besides NaCl, the buffer solution also contained 10 mM MES and 10 mM TRIS at 32°C and pH 7.32. The concentrations of lipids and RAs were 1.2 mg/ml and 0.84 mM, respectively.
Fig. 4Average z-positions of the different groups calculated for HNE adducts (A), and the number density profiles for lipid bilayer membranes of different compositions (DOPC:MA-HNE (B), DOPC:SB-HNE (C), DOPC:D-MA-HNE (D), DOPC:D-SB-HNE (E), and DOPC:SB-ONE (F)). N(PE) stands for the nitrogen atom in the DOPE ammonium group. N(MA), O(MA) and C(MA) are nitrogen and oxygen in hydroxyl group, and terminal carbon atom of MA-HNE and D-MA-HNE, respectively. N(SB), O(SB) and C(SB) are nitrogen and oxygen in the hydroxyl group and terminal carbon atom of SB-HNE, D-SB-HNE, and ONE-Schiff base adducts, respectively. OW is the water oxygen atom.
Fig. 5Influence of HNE and ONE adducts on area per lipid (A) and hydrophobic thickness (B) in membranes of different lipid compositions. Membranes were composed of DOPC:DOPE or DOPC:RADOPE (50:50 mol%). The RAs used were: the Michael adduct of HNE (MA-HNE), Schiff base adduct of HNE (SB-HNE), and Schiff base adduct of ONE (SB-ONE). D-MA-HNE and D-SB-HNE are double Michael adducts or Schiff base adducts of HNE. Hydrophobic thickness was calculated for OW ndp = 1 nm−3.
Fig. 6Influence of HNE and ONE adducts on free energy barrier (A) and permeability coefficient (B). For labels see Fig. 5.
Fig. 7Mechanism of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) action on lipid bilayer membrane. HNE, produced by cells under conditions of oxidative stress, covalently modifies phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) forming different HNE-PE adducts (orange-lila). Their position in lipid bilayer membrane is responsible for decrease in energy barrier ΔG and increase in permeability PNa for sodium ions. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)