| Literature DB >> 31459862 |
Julia Stroh1, Naveed Z Ali1, Christiane Maierhofer1, Franziska Emmerling1.
Abstract
Here, we report on a first mechanochemical synthesis of ettringite, an important cement hydrate phase. The mineral compound ettringite ([Ca3Al(OH)6]2·(SO4)3·26H2O) occurs rarely in nature, but is common for cement-based materials. Ettringite has wide technical application in the ceramic and paper industry. However, its typical wet-chemical synthesis is cumbersome and produces waste water and CO2 emissions. Here, we investigate the first mechanochemical synthesis of ettringite for developing an easy and sustainable alternative for industrial application. The mechanosynthesis was monitored in situ by coupled synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) and infrared thermography (IRT). The consumption of the reactants and the formation of the reaction product were monitored with time-resolved XRD. IRT showed the temperature increase based on the exothermic reaction. The reaction conversion was significantly improved changing the strategy of the mechanosynthesis from a one- to a two-step process. The latter included neat pregrinding of solid reactants followed by a delayed addition of the stoichiometric amount of water. Thus, an increase of reaction conversion from 34 to 94% of ettringite could be achieved.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31459862 PMCID: PMC6649167 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Schematics of the syntheses: left: one-step mechanosynthesis, right: two-step mechanosynthesis. Both processes were followed in situ by coupled IRT and synchrotron XRD analyses using the setup shown on the bottom left. Solid reactants include Ca(OH)2 (yellow), Al(OH)3 (green), and CaSO4·2H2O (red).
Figure 2In situ XRD data of the mechanochemical ettringite formation. Left: one-step mechanosynthesis; right: two-step mechanosynthesis with delayed water addition after 90 min of neat grinding of solid reactants. Reflection positions of the reactants and ettringite are shown as barcodes. Bottom: the diffractograms of the product mixtures.
Figure 3Time evolution of the temperature and the amounts of reactant and product in the reaction mixture. The temperature is shown as a difference to the room temperature (ΔT). The amounts of the compounds were assessed by calculating peak areas of their normalized diffraction signals: ettringite, reflection (1 0 0) at 9.1° (Cu Kα1); calcium sulfate dihydrate, reflection (0 2 0) at 11.6° (Cu Kα1).