| Literature DB >> 31458956 |
Sree Satya Bharati Moram1, Chandu Byram1, Sini Nanadath Shibu1, Bindu Madhuri Chilukamarri1, Venugopal Rao Soma1.
Abstract
We present a systematic study on the fabrication, characterization of versatile, and low-cost filter paper-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) substrates loaded with salt-induced aggregated Ag/Au nanoparticles (NPs). These were demonstrated as efficient SERS substrates for the detection of multiple explosive molecules such as picric acid (5 μM), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (1 μM), and 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (10 μM) along with a common dye molecule (methylene blue, 5 nM). The concentrations of the dye and explosive molecules in terms of mass represent 31.98 pg, 11.45 ng, 1.82 ng, and 13.06 ng, respectively. Silver (Ag) and gold (Au) colloidal NPs were prepared by femtosecond laser (∼50 fs, 800 nm, 1 kHz) ablation of Ag/Au-target immersed in distilled water. Subsequently, the aggregated nanoparticles were achieved by mixing the pure Ag and Au NPs with different concentrations of NaCl. These aggregated NPs were characterized by UV-visible absorption and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy techniques. The SERS substrates were prepared by soaking the filter paper in aggregated NPs. The morphologies of the paper substrates were investigated using field-emission scanning electron microscopy technique. We have achieved superior enhancements with high reproducibility and sensitivity for filter paper substrates loaded with Ag/Au NPs mixed for an optimum concentration of 50 mM NaCl.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 31458956 PMCID: PMC6644453 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1UV–visible absorption spectra of (a) nonaggregated spherical Ag NPs with λmax = 404 nm; aggregated spherical Ag NPs with different NaCl concentrations and (b) nonaggregated spherical Au NPs with λmax = 520 nm; aggregated spherical Au NPs with different NaCl concentrations.
Figure 2TEM and HRTEM images of (a,b) Ag NPs and (c,d) Au NPs in distilled water at lower and higher magnifications. Inset of (a,c) and (b,d) depicts their size distribution and SAED patterns, respectively.
Figure 3TEM images of (a) Ag NPs and (b) Au NPs mixed with NaCl solution at a concentration of 50 mM. FESEM analysis of the SERS substrates.
Figure 4FESEM images of FP loaded with Ag NPs with NaCl at different concentrations: (a) 1 mM, (b) 10 mM, (c) 50 mM, (d) 100 mM, (e) 500 mM, and (f) 1 M with the same magnification 10k×. The scale bars in (a,d,e,f) are 1 μm, whereas in (b) and (c), it is 2 μm.
Figure 5FESEM images of FP loaded with Au NPs with NaCl at different concentration (a) 1 mM (b) 10 mM (c) 50 mM (d) 100 mM (e) 500 mM (f) 1 M with the same magnification 10k×. The scale bars in (a,d,e) is 1 μm while in (b,c,f) it is 2 μm.
Figure 6Schematic representation of explosive detection by paper-based SERS substrates (Ag/Au-aggregated NP-loaded FP). Inset shows the photograph of bare and Au NP-loaded FP.
Figure 7(a) SERS spectra of MB (5 μM) acquired from FP loaded with Ag NPs at different concentrations of NaCl and (b) corresponding EF at 1620 cm–1 as a function of concentration.
Figure 8(a) SERS spectra of MB from Au NP-based FP with different concentrations of NaCl and (b) corresponding EF at 1620 cm–1 as a function of concentration.
Figure 9(a) SERS spectra of MB with various concentrations from 10–6 to 10–9 M and (b) corresponding linear calibration curves constructed by monitoring the intensity of the strong 1620 cm–1 using FP loaded with Ag NPs (50 mM NaCl).
Figure 10(a) SERS spectra of explosives: (a) PA [(i) 5 mM, (ii) 50 μM, and (iii) 5 μM], (b) DNT [(i) 5 mM, (ii) 50 μM, and (iii) 1 μM], (c) NTO [(i) 1 mM, (ii) 100 μM, and (iii) 10 μM] by using FP embedded with Ag NPs aggregated by optimized concentration of NaCl (50 mM).
Figure 11(a) SERS spectra of explosive (NTO) from different spots within paper substrate with Ag NPs at 50 mM NaCl and (b) histogram of the peak intensity at 1383 cm–1 with RSD of 9.78%.
Figure 12SERS spectra complex molecule (PA 5 μM + MB 50 nM) obtained with FP + Ag NPs + NaCl 50 mM.
Summary of the Results Obtained from Paper-Based SERS Substrates Reported in the Literature
| s. no. | NPs & size | SERS substrate | fabrication method | analyte | EF | spectrometer (wavelength) | refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ag | Whatman chromatography paper (Grade 1 CHR) | silver mirror reaction | Rhodamine (Rh6G)—10–11 M | HORIBA Jobin Yvon (532 nm and 632 nm) | ( | |
| 2 | Ag (60 nm) | GSM grade paper | pipetting NPs | RH6G—0.1 nM, Malachite green (MG)—1 nM | MG—107 | Table Top Raman spectrometer (785 nm) | ( |
| 3 | Ag | Fisher brand chromatography paper | inkjet printer | Rh6G—10 nM | 105 | HORIBA Jobin Yvon HR-VIS Raman microscope (632.8 nm) | ( |
| 5 | Ag | FP | silver mirror reaction | Crystal Violet—10–9 M Thiram—10–7 M | microscope Raman system—DeltaNu | ( | |
| 6 | Ag | Whatman No 3 grade FP | soaking in NaCl | seminal plasma Rh6G | 107 | Micro Raman System (785 nm) | ( |
| 7 | Ag | brushing | microfluidic paper | Rh6G—1 nM MG—10 nM | 107 | DXR Raman microscope (632.8 nm) | ( |
| 8 | Au NRs (60 nm long and 18 nm dia.) | Whatman FP grade 1 | drop cast | 5 × 106 | Raman system (785 nm) | ( | |
| 9 | Ag NPs & Ag NSs (stars) | Whatman FP grade 1 | drop cast | Rhodamine (Rh6G) | 107 | HORIBA Jobin Yvon (633 nm) | ( |
| 10 | Ag nano triangles | FP | immersion | PA—10–6 M PATP—10–8 M | Titan Electro Optics Raman spectrometer (532 nm) | ( | |
| 11 | Ag nanowires | Millipore-mixed cellulose membrane | filtrating of Ag NS through hydrophilic filter | CV—1.0 × 10–8 mol·L–1 BPE—5.0 × 10–9 mol·L–1 | 7.7 × 106 1.4 × 106 | Renishaw InVia Raman microscope (532, 633 and 785 nm) | ( |
| 12 | Au nanorods (5–100 nm) | Whatman FP grade 1, swab | immersion | 1,4-benzenedithiol BDT—0.1 nM | 5 × 105 | HORIBA confocal Raman spectrometer (785 nm) | ( |
| 13 | Au NPs (5–100 nm) | Whatman FP grade 4 | drop cast | 3 × 104 | HORIBA confocal Raman Spectrometer (785 nm) | ( | |
| 14 | Au NPs | Whatman chromatography FP grade 1 | ink jet printing | carboxymethyl cellulose & AuNPs (7:1), Rhodamine (RH6G) | 1.8 × 104 | SENTERRA confocal Raman spectrometer—(785 nm) | ( |
| 15 | anisotropic Au NPs (20 nm) | FP | soaking | benzenedithiol (BDT)—1 μM steronoin—100 nM | WITec alpha300 Raman spectrometer (785 nm) | ( | |
| 16 | Au NPs | FP | dropped | mucin—1 nM | confocal Raman spectrometer (Renishaw—633 nm) | ( | |
| 17 | Au nano rods | FP | dipping | cancer screening | Raman microscope (Renishaw—785 nm) | ( | |
| 18 | Au NPs | Whatman FP grade 1 | thermal inkjet technology | 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene—94 pg DNT—7.8 pg, 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene—0.89 pg | portable spectrometer (R-3000QE, Agiltron)—785 nm | ( | |
| 19 | Au @ Ag 30 nm Au core & 7 nm Ag shell | Whatman 1 qualitative FP | printing | Thiram—10–9 mol L–1 | micro Raman system (785 nm) | ( | |
| 20 | GO @ Ag NPs @ paper | Whatman 1 chromatography paper | immersion and dip coating method | RH6G—10–19 M CV—10–20 M | HORIBA HR evolution 800 Ar excitation laser (532 nm) | ( | |
| 21 | Au NPs (15–120 nm) Au NRs Ag NPs (50–80 nm) | A4 paper FP | pen-on-paper | LOD < 10 attomoles-dye < 10 ppb—pesticide | Micro-Renishaw InVia reflex system (532, 633, and 785 nm) | ( | |
| 22 | Au porous nanospheres (55 nm) | laboratory FP | soaking | Rhodamine (Rh6G)—10 nM | 2.3 × 106 | Renishaw Invia Raman (633 nm) | ( |
| 23 | aggregated Ag/Au NPs | Whatman FP grade 1 | soaking | MB (5 nM), PA (5 μM), DNT (1 μM), NTO (10 μM) | 3.4 × 107, 2.4 × 104, 2 × 104, 2.1 × 104 | portable (BWTEK) 785 nm | present study |