| Literature DB >> 31458780 |
Dhanasekaran Vikraman1,2, Sajjad Hussain3,3, Kamran Akbar3,4, Kathalingam Adaikalam2, Seung Hu Lee1, Seung-Hyun Chun3, Jongwan Jung3,3, Hyun-Seok Kim2, Hui Joon Park1,1.
Abstract
A cost-effective solution-based synthesis route to grow MoSe2 thin films with vertically aligned atomic layers, thereby maximally exposing the edge sites on the film surface as well as enhancing charge transport to the electrode, is demonstrated for hydrogen evolution reaction. The surface morphologies of thin films are investigated by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy analyses confirm the formation of the vertically aligned layered structure of MoSe2 in those films, with supporting evidences obtained by Raman. Additionally, their optical and compositional properties are investigated by photoluminescence and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and their electrical properties are evaluated using bottom-gate field-effect transistors. The resultant pristine MoSe2 thin film exhibited low overpotential of 88 mV (at 10 mA·cm-2) and a noticeably high exchange current density of 0.845 mA·cm-2 with excellent stability, which is superior to most of other reported MoS2 or MoSe2-based catalysts, even without any other strategies such as doping, phase transformation, and integration with other materials.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 31458780 PMCID: PMC6641717 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b00459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Characteristics of MoSe2 thin films. (a–c) Schematic representation of (a) solution preparation, (b) thin film deposition of the CBD process for the vertically aligned layered MoSe2 films, and (c) post-deposition annealing for the enhancement of the crystallinity of MoSe2 thin films in a Se environment using a tubular furnace. (d) Raman spectra (inset: X-ray diffraction patterns). (e) PL with their deconvoluted spectra. (f,g) XPS signals with their deconvoluted spectra for (f) Mo and (g) Se.
Figure 2Nanomorphologies of MoSe2 thin films. (a–e) SEM images, (f–j) TEM images (inset: high resolution), and (k–o) AFM topographical images (inset: AFM thickness profile spectra) of MoSe2 thin films prepared with different deposition times, such as 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min.
Figure 3Electrical properties of 15 min-grown MoSe2 thin film, characterized by FET. (a) Transfer characteristics (IDS vs VGS) of FET at VDS = 1 V (inset: optical image of MoSe2 FET). (b) Output characteristics (IDS vs VDS) of FET at various VGS of 0–80 V (10 V step). The inset shows the IDS–VDS curves at low VDS exhibiting a good linearity.
Figure 4Electrocatalytic performances of MoSe2 thin films. (a) Polarization curves. (b) Corresponding Tafel slopes. (c) Stability test for 20 h (15 min-grown sample). (d) Time course of the catalytic current during an electrolysis experiment (15 min-grown sample) at overpotential −88 mV vs RHE.
Comparison of the Catalytic Performances of This Work with the Reported Values
| electrocatalyst | overpotential (mV)@ 10 mA·cm–2 | Tafel slope (mV·dec–1) | exchange current density (mA·cm–2) | refs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MoS2 or MoSe2 | |||||
| vertical arrays of stepped MoS2 | 104 | 59 | 0.2 | ( | |
| network or flowerlike MoSe2 | 228 | 92 | ( | ||
| MoS2 treated by O2 plasma or annealed by H2 | >600 | 147–171 | 0.00038 | ( | |
| dendritic MoS2 | ∼225 | 73 | 0.0245 | ( | |
| nanotriangular MoS2 | ∼200 | 61 | 0.0381 | ( | |
| hierarchical MoSe2– | ∼290 | 98 | ( | ||
| vertically aligned MoSe2 | >450 | 105–120 | 0.002 | ( | |
| defect-rich MoS2 | ∼190 | 50 | ( | ||
| exfoliated MoS2 | ∼210 | 70 | ( | ||
| intercalation of vertically aligned MoSe2 by Li+ | 168 | 44 | 0.00025 | ( | |
| 1T MoS2 exfoliated by Li intercalant | ∼200 | 40 | ( | ||
| double-gyroid MoS2 | ∼230 | 50 | 0.00069 | ( | |
| MoS2 or MoSe2 + doping | Pt-doped MoS2 nanosheets | ∼140 | 96 | ( | |
| S-doped MoSe2 nanosheets | ∼100 | 60 | ( | ||
| Ni-doped vertically aligned MoSe2 on carbon fiber | 250 | 59.8 | 0.00038 | ( | |
| MoS2 or MoSe2-based hybrid | MoSe2–RGO (with PVP) nanosheets | ∼200 | 70 | ( | |
| MoS2–CuS | 100 | 39 | ( | ||
| hydrazine-treated MoO | >300 | 50 | 0.045 | ( | |
| MoS2(1– | 69 | 42.1 | 0.2994 | ( | |
| NiSe nanocrystallites on MoSe2 nanosheets | 210 | 56 | ( | ||
| MoSe2 nanosheets decorated on carbon Fiber | 182 | 69–76 | 0.0233 | ( | |
| MoSe2 nanoflowers on RGO nanosheets | 195 | 67 | ( | ||
| MoS2-coated CoSe2 nanobelts | 68 | 36 | 0.073 | ( | |
| Li-treated MoO | ∼290 | 52 | ( | ||
| perpendicularly oriented MoSe2 on SnO2 nanotubes | 174 | 51 | ( | ||
| perpendicularly oriented MoSe2 on graphene nanosheets | 159 | 61 | ( | ||
| MoS2 nanosheets on SnO2 nanotubes | ∼220 | 59 | ( | ||
| amorphous
MoS | ∼220 | 41 | ( | ||
| MoSe2 nanosheets on RGO | 115 | 69 | ( | ||
| MoS2 nanosheets between RGO sheets | ∼170 | 41 | ( | ||
| MoS1.0Se1.0 alloy | ∼200 | 56 | 0.32 | ( | |
| Li-intercalated MoS2 nanoparticles on the carbon fiber | >110 | 62 | 0.167 | ( |