| Literature DB >> 31456761 |
Lei Sun1, Yuhua Fu2, Yang Yang1, Xinxin Wang1, Weijie Cui1, Dan Li1, Xiaohui Yuan2, Zhiwu Zhang3, Yongping Fu1, Yu Li1.
Abstract
Agaricus bisporus distributed in the Tibetan Plateau of China has high-stress resistance that is valuable for breeding improvements. However, its evolutionary history, specialization, and adaptation to the extreme Tibetan Plateau environment are largely unknown. Here, we performed de novo genome sequencing of a representative Tibetan Plateau wild strain ABM and comparative genomic analysis with the reported European strain H97 and H39. The assembled ABM genome was 30.4 Mb in size, and comprised 8,562 protein-coding genes. The ABM genome shared highly conserved syntenic blocks and a few inversions with H97 and H39. The phylogenetic tree constructed by 1,276 single-copy orthologous genes in nine fungal species showed that the Tibetan Plateau and European A. bisporus diverged ∼5.5 million years ago. Population genomic analysis using genome resequencing of 29 strains revealed that the Tibetan Plateau population underwent significant differentiation from the European and American populations and evolved independently, and the global climate changes critically shaped the demographic history of the Tibetan Plateau population. Moreover, we identified key genes that are related to the cell wall and membrane system, and the development and defense systems regulated A. bisporus adapting to the harsh Tibetan Plateau environment. These findings highlight the value of genomic data in assessing the evolution and adaptation of mushrooms and will enhance future genetic improvements of A. bisporus.Entities:
Keywords: adaptation; button mushroom; demographic history; genome sequencing; resequencing
Year: 2019 PMID: 31456761 PMCID: PMC6700258 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Strains of Agaricus bisporus var. bisporus used for genome resequencing.
| CCMJ1009 | AB3 | A15 | America | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1013 | AB7 | As2796 | Fujian, China | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1018 | AB12 | As4580 | Fujian, China | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1020 | AB14 | ZA | Germany | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1021 | AB25 | S130A | America | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1028 | AB22 | S46 | Fujian, China | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1033 | AB27 | C13 | America | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1035 | AB29 | 72 | America | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1037 | AB31 | U1 | Netherlands | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1038 | AB32 | PSU310 | America | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1039 | AB33 | 126 | Netherlands | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1053 | AB35 | M-1 | Spain | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1106 | AB43 | 2094 | Tibet, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1109 | AB42 | Ag23 | England | Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1352 CCMJ1343 | AB51 AB39 | A12 W192 | America Fujian, China | Cultivated strain Cultivated strain |
| CCMJ1347 | AB54 | T12387 | Yunnan, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1350 | AB57 | W1 | Sichuan, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1351 | AB58 | W2 | Sichuan, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1360 | AB67 | W3 | Sichuan, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1361 | AB68 | W4 | Sichuan, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1363 | AB70 | W5 | Sichuan, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1369 | AB76 | W6 | Sichuan, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1372 | AB79 | W7 | Sichuan, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1374 | AB81 | W11 | Sichuan, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1377 | AB84 | W8 | Sichuan, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1379 | AB86 | W12 | Sichuan, China | Wild strain |
| CCMJ1381 | AB88 | W9 | Sichuan, China | Wild stain |
| CCMJ1384 | AB91 | W10 | Sichuan, China | Wild stain |
Summary of genome assembly and annotation of three A. bisporus var. bisporus strains.
| ABM | 30.44M | 18 | 2.3M | 46.53 | 8,562 | 3.80M (12.50%) | 0.11M (0.36%) |
| H97 | 30.23M | 29 | 0.3M | 46.50 | 8,631 | 4.18M (13.83%) | 0.77M (2.53%) |
| H39 | 30.78M | 13 | 2.5M | 46.52 | 8,492 | 5.16M (16.76%) | 0.02M (0.06%) |
FIGURE 1The ABM genome and evolution of A. bisporus. (A) The A. bisporus genome. Outside to inside of concentric circles show GC content, assembly scaffold number, gene density, non-coding RNA (ncRNA), all repeat content, LTR content, LINE content, DNA repeat content, satellite content. (B) Venn diagram of the predicted gene number in InterPro, KEGG, SwissProt, KOG, and NR database. (C) Numbers on the nodes represent the divergence times. The number of expanded (green) and contracted (red) gene families in each lineage is shown on the corresponding branch. MRCA, most recent common ancestor.
FIGURE 2The comparative genomic analysis of three A. bisporus strains. (A) Unique and share gene families. The number of unique and shared gene families is shown in each of the diagram components. (B) Comparison of orthologous genes. (C) Whole-genome collinearity analysis, which only showed the contigs exhibiting significant collinear relationship among species.
FIGURE 3Demographic history of A. bisporus distributed in the Tibet Plateau.
FIGURE 4Population genomic analysis of A. bisporus. (A) Phylogenetic tree. (B) PCA plots. (C) Genetic structure.
FIGURE 5Genomic regions with strong selective sweep signals in the wild high-resistance and cultural high-sense populations of A. bisporus. (A) Distribution of Pi ratios and FST values. The region of red point were identified as selected regions for two groups. (B) Part of selected genes with their genotype diversity.