Literature DB >> 31456560

Surveillance of vancomycin-resistant enterococci reveals shift in dominating clones and national spread of a vancomycin-variable vanA Enterococcus faecium ST1421-CT1134 clone, Denmark, 2015 to March 2019.

Anette M Hammerum1, Ulrik S Justesen2, Mette Pinholt3, Louise Roer1, Hülya Kaya1, Peder Worning3, Sanne Nygaard4, Michael Kemp2, Marianne Engell Clausen5, Karen Leth Nielsen6, Jurgita Samulioniené7, Mona Kjærsgaard8, Claus Østergaard9, John Coia10, Turid Snekloth Søndergaard11, Shahin Gaini12,13,14, Kristian Schønning15,3, Henrik Westh15,3, Henrik Hasman1, Barbara Juliane Holzknecht4.   

Abstract

We describe clonal shifts in vanA Enterococcus faecium isolates from clinical samples obtained from patients in Denmark from 2015 to the first quarter (Q1) of 2019. During Q1 2019, the vancomycin-variable enterococci (VVE) ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium became the most dominant vanA E. faecium clone and has spread to all five regions in Denmark. Among 174 E. faecium isolates with vanA, vanB or vanA/vanB genes in Q1 2019, 44% belonged to this type.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterococci; MLST; VRE; VVE; vanA; vanB

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31456560      PMCID: PMC6712932          DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.34.1900503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Euro Surveill        ISSN: 1025-496X


We describe the clonal shift for vanA Enterococcus faecium during the last 4 years and the national spread of a vancomycin-variable vanA E. faecium ST1421-CT1134 clone in Denmark. The aim is to highlight the importance of using molecular methods for detecting vancomycin-variable enterococci (VVE), and to alert other countries about this emerging nosocomial clone.

Vancomycin-variable enterococci

Vancomycin-variable enterococci (VVE) are E. faecium harboring the vanA gene complex, but being phenotypically vancomycin susceptible [1,2]. VVE can only be detected by molecular methods and cannot be cultured on selective vancomycin-containing media. Different clones of VVE have caused nosocomial outbreaks and development of vancomycin-resistant revertant mutants in vitro and in vivo has been described [1,3-5]. This makes the detection of VVE highly important in clinical samples in order to assure relevant antibiotic treatment and in screening samples to avoid nosocomial spread. In 2015 and 2016, sporadic VVE with different genetic background were detected in the Capital Region of Denmark, in connection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) outbreaks (data not shown). In 2016, a VVE clone belonging to ST1421-CT1134, which displays variable vancomycin susceptibility (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 1 to ≥ 256 mg/ml) was detected in screening samples from a hospital in the Capital Region [5]. One strain, Efm-V1511, belonging to this clone was characterised by Hansen et al. [5]. Efm-V1511 had a 49.6 Kp plasmid, which carried the Tn1546 (vanA transposon). Tn1546 was truncated in vanX by a 252 bp 3' deletion explaining the vancomycin susceptibility of Efm-V1511. In ST1421-CT1134 isolates resistant to vancomycin, resistance could be attributed to changes in ddl disrupting gene function sometimes accompanied by changes in vanS, increased pHVH-V1511 copy number or the existence of an additional vanA-containing plasmid encoding a functional vanX [5].

National surveillance of vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-variable enterococci

We have previously described the surveillance of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in clinical isolates in Denmark from 2005 to 2015 [6]. In the present study, we follow up and describe the data from isolates obtained from 2016 through the first quarter (Q1) of 2019. Since 2005, VRE isolates from clinical samples, e.g. urine, blood and tissue, as opposed to screening (faecal) isolates have been voluntarily submitted to Statens Serum Institut (SSI) from Danish Departments of Clinical Microbiology (DCM) for species identification, genotyping and surveillance (Figure 1) [7]. Only one isolate per patient per 12 months was included. All VRE isolates (699 E. faecium and 30 E. faecalis) were tested for the presence of vancomycin resistance genes vanA and vanB by PCR from 2005 through 2014.
Figure 1

The five healthcare regions and the 10 Departments of Clinical Microbiology, Denmark, 2019

The five healthcare regions and the 10 Departments of Clinical Microbiology, Denmark, 2019 DCM: Department of Clinical Microbiology; ND: not detected. Modified from DANMAP 2017 [7]. From 2015 through Q1 2019, all clinical VRE/VVE isolates (n = 1,935) underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as previously described [6]. From the WGS data, multilocus sequence type (MLST), and van genes were extracted in silico. The isolates were further subtyped in SeqSphere + (Ridom GmbH, Münster, Germany (http://www.ridom.de/seqsphere/)) using the cgMLST scheme by de Been et al. [8] for E. faecium. VVE diagnostic algorithms have differed substantially over time and between the five Danish regions. In 2017, testing of phenotypically vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium isolates from blood cultures for the presence of vanA/vanB genes by PCR was introduced in the DCMs in the Capital Region. During 2018, this was expanded to testing of all clinical E. faecium isolates. During 2018, molecular testing by PCR of E. faecium from all clinical samples was also implemented in one of the four DCMs in the Region of Southern Denmark. Furthermore, E. faecium isolates from blood cultures were tested by PCR for vanA/vanB genes in another DCM in the Region of Southern Denmark and in the DCM in the Central Denmark Region in 2018. In Q1 2019, diagnostic algorithms to detect VVE have expanded. Most of the DCMs across Denmark test at least all blood culture E. faecium isolates for the presence of vanA genes using PCR.

Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolates from clinical samples carrying vanA and vanB genes

From 2005 to Q1 2019, 2,503 vanA E. faecium, 74 vanB E. faecium, 32 vanA/vanB E. faecium, 12 vanA E. faecalis, and 43 vanB E. faecalis from clinical samples were submitted to SSI (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-variable Enterococcus faecium and vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis isolates from clinical samples carrying van genes, Denmark, 2005–Q1 2019 (n = 2,664)

Vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-variable Enterococcus faecium and vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis isolates from clinical samples carrying van genes, Denmark, 2005–Q1 2019 (n = 2,664) Q1: first quarter.

Emergence and disappearance of major Enterococcus faecium clones

Of the 1,935 VRE/VVE isolates obtained from 2015 through Q1 2019, 1,910 were E. faecium and 25 E. faecalis (Figure 2). The E. faecium isolates belonged to 29 sequence types (STs). ST80 (22%), ST203 (65%) and ST1421 (9%) were most prevalent. Typing by cgMLST revealed 156 different complex types (CTs). The 13 most common types of vanA, vanB and vanA/vanB E. faecium from 2015 to Q1 2019 are shown in Table 1. From 2015 to 2019, three types were dominating: ST80-CT14 vanA E. faecium, ST203-CT859 vanA E. faecium and ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium (Table 1).
Table 1

Description of the most common types of vanA and/or vanB Enterococcus faecium by MLST and cgMLST, Denmark, 2015–Q1 2019 (n = 1,910)

Types2015(n = 369)2016(n = 427)2017(n = 425)2018(n = 515)Q1 2019(n = 174)
n%n%n%n%n%
ST80-CT14 vanA 81223891541 < 1NDND
ST80-CT24 vanA 2361941132< 142
ST80-CT860 vanA 72113NDNDNDNDNDND
ST80-CT866 vanA 14410272NDNDNDND
ST80-CT991 vanA NDND1139261NDND
ST80-CT1160 vanA NDNDNDND72102NDND
ST80-CT1064 vanA/vanB NDND2< 18223542
ST80-CT1729 vanA NDNDNDNDNDND22421
ST117-CT873 vanA 51123NDNDNDNDNDND
ST117-CT1180 vanA NDNDNDND9230674
ST117-CT36 vanB NDNDNDNDNDND2< 1169
ST203-CT859 (subtypes CT1051 and CT1507) vanA 188512716426563161312012
ST1421-CT1134 vanA NDND2< 1133176347744
Other types51145112811982164425

CT: cluster type (cgMLST); MLST: multilocus sequence typing; ND: not detected; ST: sequence type (MLST); Q1: first quarter.

CT: cluster type (cgMLST); MLST: multilocus sequence typing; ND: not detected; ST: sequence type (MLST); Q1: first quarter. In 2015, 22% of the E. faecium isolates belonged to ST80-CT14 vanA E. faecium. The type decreased during 2016. ST203-CT859 vanA E. faecium isolates were first detected during the end of 2014 [6]. It emerged very fast and was the most prevalent vanA E. faecium type (together with its subtypes CT1051 and CT1507) during 2015 to 2017, but decreased in 2018 (Table1). In Q1 2019 only 12% of the VRE/VVE E. faecium isolates belonged to ST203-CT859. In 2017, 3% of the E. faecium isolates belonged to the VVE clone, ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium. This type was only detected from clinical samples from the Capital Region. In 2018, 34% of the E. faecium isolates belonged to ST1421-CT1134 and were detected in the Capital Region, the Region Zealand and from one DCM in the Region of Southern Denmark (Table 1, Table 2). During Q1 2019, ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium was the most prevalent type (44%) (Table 1). It was detected in all five regions of Denmark, 50 isolates from the Capital Region, one isolate from Region Zealand, 23 isolates from the Region of Southern Denmark, two isolates from Central Denmark Region and one isolate from the North Denmark Region (Table 2). Furthermore, ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium spread to the Faroe Islands during 2018 and 2019 (data not shown).
Table 2

Regional occurrence of ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium, Denmark, 2016–Q1 2019 (n = 268)

Region2016(n = 2)2017(n = 13)2018(n = 176)Q1 2019(n = 77)
Capital Region of Denmark2915850
Region ZealandND391
Region of Southern DenmarkNDND923
Central Denmark RegionNDNDND2
North Denmark RegionND1ND1

Q1: first quarter.

Q1: first quarter.

Discussion and conclusion

During 2005 to Q1 2019, most of the Danish clinical VRE isolates have been vanA E. faecium isolates. This study shows that predominating clones shifted over time and, importantly, the emergence of a vancomycin-variable clone, ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium, that has spread to all the five Danish regions in 2019. Although the E. faecium isolates belonged to 156 CTs, three types (ST80-CT14 vanA E. faecium, ST203-CT859 vanA E. faecium, ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium) have dominated during the last 4 years. ST80-CT14 vanA E. faecium was highly prevalent in the Capital Region during 2012 to 2015 [9]. The vanA E. faecium constituting Group2_ST80 in the paper by Pinholt et al. [9] belonged to ST80-CT14 (data not shown). On a national level, the numbers of ST80-CT14 vanA E. faecium decreased during 2016 to 2018, and this clone was not detected during Q1 2019. ST203-CT859 vanA E. faecium emerged during 2015 through 2017 and nearly disappeared 2019. This clone has spread to Sweden, the Faroe Islands and Greenland [6,7]. Because of differences in diagnostic algorithms, there is a detection bias of VVE. It seems very likely that ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium have been under-reported in some regions at least during some periods. Thus, the rising incidence could partly be explained by increasing molecular testing of vancomycin susceptible isolates. However, a sharply increasing incidence has also been seen in DCM with extensive testing for VVE. The origin of ST80-CT14 vanA E. faecium and ST203-CT859 vanA E. faecium are still unknown. vanA E. faecium isolates belonging to ST1421-CT1134 have also been reported from Australia, but these isolates have not been VVE [10]. Why these three clones were so successful is unknown. The spread of the VVE clone, ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium, in Denmark is of concern, especially since VVE diagnostic is challenging. Because of this, the clone is likely to be underdiagnosed, which facilitates further spread. Since cross-border spread has been described for VRE, countries with patients transferred from Denmark should be aware of the vancomycin-variable ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium clone.
  9 in total

1.  Core Genome Multilocus Sequence Typing Scheme for High- Resolution Typing of Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Mark de Been; Mette Pinholt; Janetta Top; Stefan Bletz; Alexander Mellmann; Willem van Schaik; Ellen Brouwer; Malbert Rogers; Yvette Kraat; Marc Bonten; Jukka Corander; Henrik Westh; Dag Harmsen; Rob J L Willems
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  WGS of 1058 Enterococcus faecium from Copenhagen, Denmark, reveals rapid clonal expansion of vancomycin-resistant clone ST80 combined with widespread dissemination of a vanA-containing plasmid and acquisition of a heterogeneous accessory genome.

Authors:  Mette Pinholt; Sion C Bayliss; Heidi Gumpert; Peder Worning; Veronika V S Jensen; Michael Pedersen; Edward J Feil; Henrik Westh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Relentless spread and adaptation of non-typeable vanA vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium: a genome-wide investigation.

Authors:  Sebastiaan J van Hal; Alicia G Beukers; Verlaine J Timms; Justin A Ellem; Peter Taylor; Michael W Maley; Peter J Newton; John K Ferguson; Andie Lee; Sharon C-A Chen; Vitali Sintchenko
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Emergence of a vancomycin-variable Enterococcus faecium ST1421 strain containing a deletion in vanX.

Authors:  Thomas Arn Hansen; Martin Schou Pedersen; Lone Gilmor Nielsen; Chih Man German Ma; Lillian Marie Søes; Peder Worning; Christian Østergaard; Henrik Westh; Mette Pinholt; Kristian Schønning
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Emergence of vanA Enterococcus faecium in Denmark, 2005-15.

Authors:  Anette M Hammerum; Sharmin Baig; Yasmin Kamel; Louise Roer; Mette Pinholt; Heidi Gumpert; Barbara Holzknecht; Bent Røder; Ulrik S Justesen; Jurgita Samulioniené; Mona Kjærsgaard; Claus Østergaard; Anette Holm; Esad Dzajic; Turid Snekloth Søndergaard; Shahin Gaini; Petra Edquist; Erik Alm; Berit Lilje; Henrik Westh; Marc Stegger; Henrik Hasman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Vancomycin-variable Enterococcus faecium: in vivo emergence of vancomycin resistance in a vancomycin-susceptible isolate.

Authors:  Bryan Coburn; Donald E Low; Samir N Patel; Susan M Poutanen; Dea Shahinas; Alireza Eshaghi; Barbara M Willey; Allison McGeer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Outbreak of vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium containing the wild-type vanA gene.

Authors:  Tom A Szakacs; Lindsay Kalan; Michael J McConnell; Alireza Eshaghi; Dea Shahinas; Allison McGeer; Gerry D Wright; Donald E Low; Samir N Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Prevalence of vancomycin-variable Enterococcus faecium (VVE) among vanA-positive sterile site isolates and patient factors associated with VVE bacteremia.

Authors:  Philipp Kohler; Alireza Eshaghi; Hyunjin C Kim; Agron Plevneshi; Karen Green; Barbara M Willey; Allison McGeer; Samir N Patel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Silenced vanA Gene Cluster on a Transferable Plasmid Caused an Outbreak of Vancomycin-Variable Enterococci.

Authors:  Audun Sivertsen; Torunn Pedersen; Kjersti Wik Larssen; Kåre Bergh; Torunn Gresdal Rønning; Andreas Radtke; Kristin Hegstad
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Trend of clinical vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolated in a regional Italian hospital from 2001 to 2018.

Authors:  Simona Fioriti; Serena Simoni; Sara Caucci; Gianluca Morroni; Elisa Ponzio; Sonia Nina Coccitto; Lucia Brescini; Oscar Cirioni; Stefano Menzo; Francesca Biavasco; Eleonora Giovanetti; Andrea Brenciani; Carla Vignaroli
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Alternative vanHAX promoters and increased vanA-plasmid copy number resurrect silenced glycopeptide resistance in Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Theresa Maria Wagner; Jessin Janice; Audun Sivertsen; Ingegerd Sjögren; Arnfinn Sundsfjord; Kristin Hegstad
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Characterization of the Gut Microbiome and Resistomes of Wild and Zoo-Captive Macaques.

Authors:  Ting Jia; Wei-Shan Chang; Vanessa R Marcelino; Sufen Zhao; Xuefeng Liu; Yuyan You; Edward C Holmes; Mang Shi; Chenglin Zhang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-24

Review 4.  Long-Term Safety Following Faecal Microbiota Transplantation as a Treatment for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection Compared with Patients Treated with a Fixed Bacterial Mixture: Results from a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Frederik Cold; Camilla Kara Svensson; Andreas Munk Petersen; Lars Hestbjerg Hansen; Morten Helms
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Emergence of pstS-Null Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Clone ST1478, Canada, 2013-2018.

Authors:  Melissa McCracken; Robyn Mitchell; Stephanie Smith; Susy Hota; John Conly; Tim Du; John Embil; Lynn Johnston; Debbie Ormiston; Jennifer Parsonage; Andrew Simor; Alice Wong; George Golding
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 6.883

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.