Literature DB >> 25714799

Facial width-to-height ratio in a large sample of Commonwealth Games athletes.

Robin S S Kramer1.   

Abstract

Evidence that facial width-to-height ratio (FWHR) is a sexually dimorphic morphological measure is mixed. Research has also linked FWHR with aggression and other behavioral tendencies, at least in men. Again, other research has found no such relationship. Here, I tested for both possible relationships using a sample of 2,075 male and 1,406 female athletes from the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games. Men showed significantly greater FWHRs than women, but this difference could be attributed to differences in body size. In addition, I found greater FWHRs in men who competed in sports involving physical contact and those stereotyped as more masculine. Again, these results could be attributed to differences in body size between categories. For women, no differences in FWHR were found regarding the amount of contact involved in a sport and how that sport was stereotyped. Finally, the FWHRs of athletes showed no relationship with the amount of aggression and related traits that were judged as required for success in those sports, although FWHRs did correlate with perceived endurance demands in women. Therefore, in a large sample of athletes, the sex difference in FWHR could be attributed to body size, and little support was found for the predicted links between this facial measure and behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25714799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Psychol        ISSN: 1474-7049


  9 in total

1.  Facial width-to-height ratio is associated with agonistic and affiliative dominance in bonobos (Pan paniscus).

Authors:  J S Martin; N Staes; A Weiss; J M G Stevens; A V Jaeggi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Tracking sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio across the lifespan: implications for perceived aggressiveness.

Authors:  Stephanie Summersby; Bonnie Harris; Thomas F Denson; David White
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  Within-person variability in men's facial width-to-height ratio.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  The Bogazici face database: Standardized photographs of Turkish faces with supporting materials.

Authors:  S Adil Saribay; Ali Furkan Biten; Erdem Ozan Meral; Pinar Aldan; Vít Třebický; Karel Kleisner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Trust in AI Agent: A Systematic Review of Facial Anthropomorphic Trustworthiness for Social Robot Design.

Authors:  Yao Song; Yan Luximon
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Graham Albert; George B Richardson; Timothy S McHale; Seth M Weinberg; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Facial and body sexual dimorphism are not interconnected in the Maasai.

Authors:  Marina L Butovskaya; Victoria V Rostovtseva; Anna A Mezentseva
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.867

8.  Facial Width-To-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Katherine N Hanson Sobraske; Theodore Samore; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Facial features and unethical behavior - Doped athletes show higher facial width-to-height ratios than non-doping sanctioned athletes.

Authors:  Bjoern Krenn; Callum Buehler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.