Literature DB >> 31454046

Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Volumetric Bone Density and Bone Strength: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lauren A Burt1, Emma O Billington1, Marianne S Rose2, Duncan A Raymond1, David A Hanley1, Steven K Boyd1.   

Abstract

Importance: Few studies have assessed the effects of daily vitamin D doses at or above the tolerable upper intake level for 12 months or greater, yet 3% of US adults report vitamin D intakes of at least 4000 IU per day. Objective: To assess the dose-dependent effect of vitamin D supplementation on volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) and strength. Design, Setting, and Participants: Three-year, double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted in a single center in Calgary, Canada, from August 2013 to December 2017, including 311 community-dwelling healthy adults without osteoporosis, aged 55 to 70 years, with baseline levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) of 30 to 125 nmol/L. Interventions: Daily doses of vitamin D3 for 3 years at 400 IU (n = 109), 4000 IU (n = 100), or 10 000 IU (n = 102). Calcium supplementation was provided to participants with dietary intake of less than 1200 mg per day. Main Outcomes and Measures: Co-primary outcomes were total volumetric BMD at radius and tibia, assessed with high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, and bone strength (failure load) at radius and tibia estimated by finite element analysis.
Results: Of 311 participants who were randomized (53% men; mean [SD] age, 62.2 [4.2] years), 287 (92%) completed the study. Baseline, 3-month, and 3-year levels of 25(OH)D were 76.3, 76.7, and 77.4 nmol/L for the 400-IU group; 81.3, 115.3, and 132.2 for the 4000-IU group; and 78.4, 188.0, and 144.4 for the 10 000-IU group. There were significant group × time interactions for volumetric BMD. At trial end, radial volumetric BMD was lower for the 4000 IU group (-3.9 mg HA/cm3 [95% CI, -6.5 to -1.3]) and 10 000 IU group (-7.5 mg HA/cm3 [95% CI, -10.1 to -5.0]) compared with the 400 IU group with mean percent change in volumetric BMD of -1.2% (400 IU group), -2.4% (4000 IU group), and -3.5% (10 000 IU group). Tibial volumetric BMD differences from the 400 IU group were -1.8 mg HA/cm3 (95% CI, -3.7 to 0.1) in the 4000 IU group and -4.1 mg HA/cm3 in the 10 000 IU group (95% CI, -6.0 to -2.2), with mean percent change values of -0.4% (400 IU), -1.0% (4000 IU), and -1.7% (10 000 IU). There were no significant differences for changes in failure load (radius, P = .06; tibia, P = .12). Conclusions and Relevance: Among healthy adults, treatment with vitamin D for 3 years at a dose of 4000 IU per day or 10 000 IU per day, compared with 400 IU per day, resulted in statistically significant lower radial BMD; tibial BMD was significantly lower only with the 10 000 IU per day dose. There were no significant differences in bone strength at either the radius or tibia. These findings do not support a benefit of high-dose vitamin D supplementation for bone health; further research would be needed to determine whether it is harmful. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01900860.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31454046      PMCID: PMC6714464          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.11889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  35 in total

1.  Analyzing incomplete longitudinal clinical trial data.

Authors:  Geert Molenberghs; Herbert Thijs; Ivy Jansen; Caroline Beunckens; Michael G Kenward; Craig Mallinckrodt; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  Vitamin D in adult health and disease: a review and guideline statement from Osteoporosis Canada.

Authors:  David A Hanley; Ann Cranney; Glenville Jones; Susan J Whiting; William D Leslie; David E C Cole; Stephanie A Atkinson; Robert G Josse; Sidney Feldman; Gregory A Kline; Cheryl Rosen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  The development and evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire used in assessing vitamin D intake in a sample of healthy young Canadian adults of diverse ancestry.

Authors:  Hongyu Wu; Agnes Gozdzik; Jodi Lynn Barta; Dennis Wagner; David E Cole; Reinhold Vieth; Esteban J Parra; Susan J Whiting
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Efficacy and safety of vitamin D3 intake exceeding the lowest observed adverse effect level.

Authors:  R Vieth; P C Chan; G D MacFarlane
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kerrie M Sanders; Amanda L Stuart; Elizabeth J Williamson; Julie A Simpson; Mark A Kotowicz; Doris Young; Geoffrey C Nicholson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The effect of high-dose vitamin D on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mass--a randomized controlled 1-year trial.

Authors:  G Grimnes; R Joakimsen; Y Figenschau; P A Torjesen; B Almås; R Jorde
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons.

Authors:  D Podsiadlo; S Richardson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 9.  A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.

Authors:  Helen C Roberts; Hayley J Denison; Helen J Martin; Harnish P Patel; Holly Syddall; Cyrus Cooper; Avan Aihie Sayer
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 10.668

10.  No significant effect on bone mineral density by high doses of vitamin D3 given to overweight subjects for one year.

Authors:  Rolf Jorde; Monica Sneve; Peter A Torjesen; Yngve Figenschau; John-Bjarne Hansen; Guri Grimnes
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.271

View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  Official recommendations for vitamin D through the life stages in developed countries.

Authors:  Samantha M Kimball; Michael F Holick
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Vitamin D Metabolism and Guidelines for Vitamin D Supplementation.

Authors:  Indra Ramasamy
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-12

3.  Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  D E Whittier; S K Boyd; A J Burghardt; J Paccou; A Ghasem-Zadeh; R Chapurlat; K Engelke; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Parkinson's disease and osteoporosis: basic and clinical implications.

Authors:  Carolina A Figueroa; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-04-26

5.  The relationship of 25-hydroxyvitamin D values and risk of fracture: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  A J Aul; D V Dudenkov; K C Mara; Y J Juhn; C I Wi; J A Maxson; T D Thacher
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Vitamin D supplementation does not enhance resistance training-induced gains in muscle strength and lean body mass in vitamin D deficient young men.

Authors:  Lauri Savolainen; Saima Timpmann; Martin Mooses; Evelin Mäestu; Luule Medijainen; Lisette Tõnutare; Frederik Ross; Märt Lellsaar; Eve Unt; Vahur Ööpik
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Predictors of circulating vitamin D levels in healthy mid-life Singaporean women.

Authors:  Wei Fun Cheong; Shanshan Ji; Amaury Cazenave-Gassiot; Win Pa Pa Thu; Susan Logan; Jane Cauley; Michael S Kramer; Eu-Leong Yong
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  The Vitamin D Metabolite Ratio Is Associated With Changes in Bone Density and Fracture Risk in Older Adults.

Authors:  Charles Ginsberg; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Ronit Katz; Jan Hughes-Austin; Lindsay M Miller; Jessica O Becker; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Michael G Shlipak; Mark J Sarnak; Joachim H Ix
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Calcifediol or vitamin D to optimize vitamin D status: Reply to letter of M Sosas.

Authors:  R Bouillon; J M Quesada-Gomez
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Obesity-related asthma in children: A role for vitamin D.

Authors:  Brian P O'Sullivan; Laura James; Joseph M Majure; Scott Bickel; Ly-Thao Phan; Monica Serrano Gonzalez; Heather Staples; Jade Tam-Williams; Jason Lang; Jessica Snowden
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2020-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.