Literature DB >> 31453104

Primary meningitis due to Fusobacterium nucleatum successfully treated with ceftriaxone in a healthy adult male.

Trager Hintze1, Michelle Steed2,3, Eric Sievers3, John T Bagwell4, Nicola Selfa5.   

Abstract

Fusobacterium nucleatum is a rod-shaped gram-negative obligate anaerobe; this organism, and other anaerobes, are usually not a part of the culture performed for a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample. To date, four cases of Fusobacterium meningitis in adults have been published. We report successful treatment of a case of primary meningitis due to Fusobacterium nucleatum in an otherwise healthy 72-year-old male.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial meningitis; Ceftriaxone; Fusobacterium infections; Fusobacterium nucleatum

Year:  2019        PMID: 31453104      PMCID: PMC6704266          DOI: 10.1016/j.idcr.2019.e00616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IDCases        ISSN: 2214-2509


Introduction

Part of the normal flora of the oropharyngeal, gastrointestinal, and female genital tracts, Fusobacterium nucleatum is a rod-shaped gram-negative obligate anaerobe. As a pathogen, it typically causes local infections like pharyngitis, tonsillitis, and mastoiditis. When F. nucleatum results in a severe bacteremic illness it is referred to as “necrobacillosis.” As a result of the bacteremia, it can cause central nervous system complications including meningitis, brain abscess, and sinus venous thrombosis [1]. Bacterial meningitis in adults is most commonly due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Listeria monocytogenes, and Neisseria meningitidis. Most documented Fusobacterium meningitis cases occur in the pediatric population, and the majority are secondary to another infection, most commonly acute otitis media (AOM) [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]]. Three documented cases of meningitis due to Fusobacterium in adults have been reported, all of which are secondary to another primary diagnosis (AOM, spinal cord injury, and cavernous venous thrombosis) [[7], [8], [9]]. One other case described an otherwise healthy adult with meningitis due to F. necrophorum and focused on the identification of the organism through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry [10]. This case details the process of organism identification and treatment of a patient with primary meningitis due to F. nucleatum.

Case

A 72-year-old male presented to a regional medical center in a rural area of the United States with a 6-week history of headaches and neck pain and a 5-day history of nausea, vomiting, intractable hiccups, delirium, sixth cranial nerve palsy, hallucinations, and no history of rhinorrhea in that timeframe. The patient had a remote history of pituitary adenoma and transphenoidal resection and a carotid artery stenosis from the radiation. Lumbar puncture was performed with an elevated opening pressure. CSF was noted to be yellow and cloudy with a white blood cell count of 8955 cells/μL, a protein level of 400 mg/dL, and a glucose level <1 mg/dL. Computed tomography (CT) without contrast of the head was normal. The patient was initiated on a broad-spectrum antimicrobial regimen including: acyclovir, fluconazole, vancomycin, ampicillin, and ceftriaxone. Although the CSF parameters strongly indicated a bacterial course, acyclovir and fluconazole were initiated as part of the initial empiric antimicrobial regimen due to the severity of patient symptoms on arrival and the physician’s desire to broadly cover for pathogens. Prior to initiation of antimicrobials the patient was given a one-time dose of dexamethasone. Mental status showed minimal improvement 24 h following admission. At 48 h, the patient’s mental status showed marked improvement but a causative organism was yet to be identified as culture of the CSF had yielded both a negative Gram stain and negative culture. At 72 h following admission only the sixth cranial nerve palsy remained and the patient had a slightly delayed response to questioning; otherwise the patient’s mental status continued to improve. A sample was sent to the University of Washington Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory (UW-MDL) for PCR DNA amplification. The organism F. nucleatum was unequivocally identified with broad-range PCR, bacterial 16S rRNA gene primers. This result allowed a diagnosis of meningitis due to F. nucleatum on day six. On day eight, the patient was transferred to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) and continued on ceftriaxone as the sole antimicrobial agent for an additional 14 days. The patient finished the course of antimicrobials at the SNF and was discharged home. A repeat lumbar puncture was not performed as the patient had a complete resolution of symptoms. An infectious disease physician followed up with the patient via telephone at SNF discharge and 10 months. The patient declined an office visit and full workup, but reported a complete resolution of symptoms.

Discussion

Differing from the majority of other documented Fusobacterium infections, this case has no clear source of infection and appeared to be primary in origin. In the four previously reported cases, infection with Fusobacterium was fatal in one of the four patients. The patient in the fatal case report had an extensive history of alcoholism with encephalitis and hydrocephalus complicating the clinical course and failed to respond to combination metronidazole and penicillin [7]. In all cases, the identification of the bacterium via CSF culture was delayed, likely because anaerobic cultures are generally not performed on CSF samples [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. In the current case and in three of four reported cases, patients were started on a broad empiric antimicrobial regimen for meningitis that included a third-generation cephalosporin (see Table 1) [[7], [8], [9]]. One case included meropenem in addition to vancomycin [10]. In surviving patients, the agent used was either cefotaxime, meropenem, or ceftriaxone (current case). The patients from the three published reports of surviving cases were treated with metronidazole only after the finding of Fusobacterium and responded to therapy within 48–72 h of administration. The patient described in the current case was not changed from ceftriaxone because of the marked improvement demonstrated on this agent.
Table 1

Treatment and Outcomes in Fusobacterium meningitis.

Primary DiagnosisOtitis Media [7]Spinal cord injury [8]Carotid artery stenosis [9]PCR- Electrospray [10]Meningitis(Current Case)
Empiric antimicrobial therapyCeftriaxoneCefotaximeCefotaximeVancomycinCeftriaxone
VancomycinFosfomycinChloramphenicolMeropenemVancomycin
AmpicillinMetronidazole*Ampicillin
Fusobacterium therapyMetronidazoleMetronidazoleMetronidazoleMeropenemCeftriaxone
Penicillin
Days from admission to Fusobacterium therapy9None reported956N/A
Adjunctive therapiesDexamethasoneNone reportedNone reportedNone ReportedDexa-methasone
OutcomeDied on day 12 from increased intracranial pressure and brain stem infarctionSurvived with complete symptom resolutionSurvived with majority symptom resolution upon dischargeSurvived with majority of symptom resolution within 12 monthsSurvived with majority of symptom resolution upon discharge
Treatment and Outcomes in Fusobacterium meningitis. With no established guidelines for treatment of meningitis due to Fusobacterium, antibacterial selection is guided by clinical judgement, available drug resources, and drug action. Coverage of Fusobacterium could have been conferred by ampicillin or ceftriaxone from the empiric regimen, though neither of these agents would be a first-line option for an anaerobe like Fusobacterium. In the published case reports where the patient survived, neither ampicillin or ceftriaxone was a chosen agent. Use of cefotaxime over ceftriaxone may have been entirely due to formulary restrictions; the similarities in antibacterial coverage between these two third-generation cephalosporins would suggest similar results should be expected from either agent. Ampicillin was chosen as part of the empiric therapy because of the patient’s age and risk for meningitis due to Listeria species. The nature of the infection being primary or secondary may play a role in the efficacy of a third-generation cephalosporin. In the published cases, meningitis due to Fusobacterium was secondary to another disease process whereas the infection was primary in the present case. The ability to send a sample to UW-MDL for PCR DNA amplification greatly aided the institution in the identification of a causal organism. In areas without this resource, identification is delayed, but with a focus on patient symptom improvement and a high usage rate of ceftriaxone in empiric therapy for meningitis it is possible there are other cases of meningitis due to Fusobacterium that are not identified. As universal PCR becomes available to a greater number of institutions, the identification of meningitis due to Fusobacterium could increase and ceftriaxone could be considered as a viable option for treatment.

Note

At the time of patient encounter, data collection, and article preparation Dr. Hintze was a fourth-year pharmacy student at Idaho State University College of Pharmacy.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Trager Hintze: Data curation, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Michelle Steed: Writing - original draft, Supervision. Eric Sievers: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. John T. Bagwell: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Nicola Selfa: Resources, Writing - review & editing.
  10 in total

1.  Characteristics of brain abscess with isolation of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  Gwenaël Le Moal; Cédric Landron; Ghislaine Grollier; Benoit Bataille; France Roblot; Pascal Nassans; Bertrand Becq-Giraudon
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  2003

2.  A 12-year-old girl with pharyngitis, meningitis and sinovenous thrombosis.

Authors:  Jacob L Jaremko; Adam Kirton; Jennifer L Brenner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Carotid artery stenoses and thrombosis secondary to cavernous sinus thromboses in Fusobacterium necrophorum meningitis.

Authors:  T H Jones; V Bergvall; J P Bradshaw
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Identification of occult Fusobacterium nucleatum central nervous system infection by use of PCR-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Sudha Nagalingam; Michelle Lisgaris; Benigno Rodriguez; Michael R Jacobs; Michael Lederman; Robert A Salata; Andrea M Hujer; Atis Muehlenbachs; Marlene DeLeon-Carnes; John J Farrell; Rangarajan Sampath; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Meningitis due to Fusobacterium nucleatum after a kart crash.

Authors:  E Denes; A Cypierre; J Vacquier; M Matt; P Weinbreck
Journal:  Med Mal Infect       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.152

6.  Fulminant Fusobacterium necrophorum meningitis in an immunocompetent adolescent.

Authors:  Giulia Angelino; Nicoletta Cantarutti; Sara Chiurchiù; Donato Amodio; Maia De Luca; Laura Lancella; Luana Coltella; Cristina Russo; Andrea Finocchi
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.454

7.  Meningitis due to Fusobacterium necrophorum in an adult.

Authors:  SreeNeelima Garimella; Aparna Inaparthy; Thomas Herchline
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Rare but numerous serious complications of acute otitis media in a young child.

Authors:  Mariëtte P E Van Munster; Frank Brus; Dick Mul
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-03-12

Review 9.  Fusobacterium necrophorum middle ear infections in children and related complications: report of 25 cases and literature review.

Authors:  Alban Le Monnier; Anne Jamet; Etienne Carbonnelle; Gwladys Barthod; Kaoutar Moumile; Fabrice Lesage; Jean-Ralph Zahar; Yves Mannach; Patrick Berche; Vincent Couloigner
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 10.  Meningitis due to Fusobacterium necrophorum subspecies necrophorum. Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  J A Jacobs; J J Hendriks; P D Verschure; A M van der Wurff; G Freling; G D Vos; E E Stobberingh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.553

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.