OBJECTIVES: To identify subtypes of neuropsychiatric symptom (NPS) course among cognitively normal individuals and to assess the association between these subtypes and hazard of later mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia diagnosis. METHODS: We modeled neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire (NPI-Q) scores from 4184 volunteers over approximately 4 years using growth mixture models, generating latent classes of trajectory. We then fit Cox proportional hazard models to determine if membership in trajectory classes was associated with increased hazard of diagnosis of MCI or dementia. RESULTS: We identified four trajectory classes: the majority of the sample (65%) would be expected to belong to a class with consistently low or zero NPS. The next most prevalent class, (16%) showed a decrease over time in NPI-Q total score but, compared with the majority class had an almost threefold increase in hazard of MCI or dementia (HR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.82-4.68). Another class (14%) showed an increase in NPS over time and was also associated with greater hazard of MCI or dementia (HR: 3.96; CI: 2.61-6.03). The smallest class (5%) had high and fluctuating NPI-Q total scores and had the greatest hazard (HR: 4.57; CI: 2.72-7.63). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that it is possible to identify meaningful groups of NPS trajectories and that trajectory of NPS can convey information beyond a single cross-sectional measure. While even those whose NPS improved were at increased hazard of MCI or dementia, hazard increased as a function of the severity of the NPS trajectory.
OBJECTIVES: To identify subtypes of neuropsychiatric symptom (NPS) course among cognitively normal individuals and to assess the association between these subtypes and hazard of later mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia diagnosis. METHODS: We modeled neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire (NPI-Q) scores from 4184 volunteers over approximately 4 years using growth mixture models, generating latent classes of trajectory. We then fit Cox proportional hazard models to determine if membership in trajectory classes was associated with increased hazard of diagnosis of MCI or dementia. RESULTS: We identified four trajectory classes: the majority of the sample (65%) would be expected to belong to a class with consistently low or zero NPS. The next most prevalent class, (16%) showed a decrease over time in NPI-Q total score but, compared with the majority class had an almost threefold increase in hazard of MCI or dementia (HR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.82-4.68). Another class (14%) showed an increase in NPS over time and was also associated with greater hazard of MCI or dementia (HR: 3.96; CI: 2.61-6.03). The smallest class (5%) had high and fluctuating NPI-Q total scores and had the greatest hazard (HR: 4.57; CI: 2.72-7.63). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that it is possible to identify meaningful groups of NPS trajectories and that trajectory of NPS can convey information beyond a single cross-sectional measure. While even those whose NPS improved were at increased hazard of MCI or dementia, hazard increased as a function of the severity of the NPS trajectory.
Authors: Gloria Dal Forno; Mark T Palermo; Janet E Donohue; Helen Karagiozis; Alan B Zonderman; Claudia H Kawas Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Zahinoor Ismail; Eric E Smith; Yonas Geda; David Sultzer; Henry Brodaty; Gwenn Smith; Luis Agüera-Ortiz; Rob Sweet; David Miller; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Anna Pink; Gorazd B Stokin; Mairead M Bartley; Rosebud O Roberts; Ondrej Sochor; Mary M Machulda; Janina Krell-Roesch; David S Knopman; Jazmin I Acosta; Teresa J Christianson; V Shane Pankratz; Michelle M Mielke; Ronald C Petersen; Yonas E Geda Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Kumar B Rajan; Robert S Wilson; Kimberly A Skarupski; Carlos F Mendes de Leon; Denis A Evans Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Ian G McKeith; Bradley F Boeve; Dennis W Dickson; Glenda Halliday; John-Paul Taylor; Daniel Weintraub; Dag Aarsland; James Galvin; Johannes Attems; Clive G Ballard; Ashley Bayston; Thomas G Beach; Frédéric Blanc; Nicolaas Bohnen; Laura Bonanni; Jose Bras; Patrik Brundin; David Burn; Alice Chen-Plotkin; John E Duda; Omar El-Agnaf; Howard Feldman; Tanis J Ferman; Dominic Ffytche; Hiroshige Fujishiro; Douglas Galasko; Jennifer G Goldman; Stephen N Gomperts; Neill R Graff-Radford; Lawrence S Honig; Alex Iranzo; Kejal Kantarci; Daniel Kaufer; Walter Kukull; Virginia M Y Lee; James B Leverenz; Simon Lewis; Carol Lippa; Angela Lunde; Mario Masellis; Eliezer Masliah; Pamela McLean; Brit Mollenhauer; Thomas J Montine; Emilio Moreno; Etsuro Mori; Melissa Murray; John T O'Brien; Sotoshi Orimo; Ronald B Postuma; Shankar Ramaswamy; Owen A Ross; David P Salmon; Andrew Singleton; Angela Taylor; Alan Thomas; Pietro Tiraboschi; Jon B Toledo; John Q Trojanowski; Debby Tsuang; Zuzana Walker; Masahito Yamada; Kenji Kosaka Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 9.910