| Literature DB >> 31450853 |
Cho Lee Wong1, Kai Chow Choi1, Bernard M H Law1, Dorothy N S Chan1, Winnie K W So2.
Abstract
The utilization rate of cervical cancer screening services among South Asian women is low. Multimedia interventions conducted by community health workers (CHWs) could potentially enhance the cervical cancer screening uptake among these individuals. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and preliminary effects of a CHW-led multimedia intervention on cervical cancer screening uptake among this underprivileged group. This pilot study utilized a randomized wait-list controlled trial design. Forty-two South Asian women were recruited at six ethnic minority associations. Randomization of each organization into either the intervention arm or wait-list control arm was then performed. The intervention was conducted by the CHWs from the associations where the participants were recruited. Outcome measures, were assessed and compared at baseline and immediately post-intervention. We demonstrated that the intervention was feasible as evidenced by the high consent rate and low withdrawal and attrition rates. The intervention arm showed a statistically significant improvement in perceived benefits (p = 0.001) and perceived barriers (p = 0.02). However, no significant difference was noted in screening uptake and screening intention between arms. Our findings support the feasibility of CHW-led multimedia intervention and provide preliminary evidence of its effectiveness on enhancing the cervical cancer screening beliefs among South Asian women.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical cancer; South Asians; cancer screening; community health worker
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31450853 PMCID: PMC6747061 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16173072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The flow diagram of intervention and data collection points. CHW: community health worker.
Baseline characteristics of the participants (n = 42).
| Characteristics | Control ( | Intervention ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) † | 41.57 (8.8) | 41.43 (12.0) | 0.965 a |
| Ethnicity | |||
| Pakistani | 5 (23.8%) | 9 (42.9%) | 0.386 b |
| Nepali | 8 (38.1%) | 7 (33.3%) | |
| Indian | 8 (38.1%) | 5 (23.8%) | |
| Educational level | |||
| Primary school or below | 4 (19.0%) | 5 (23.8%) | 0.723 c |
| Secondary school | 10 (47.6%) | 7 (33.3%) | |
| College or above | 7 (33.3%) | 9 (42.9%) | |
| Have part-/full-time job | |||
| No | 13 (61.9%) | 17 (81.0%) | 0.172 b |
| Yes | 8 (38.1%) | 4 (19.0%) | |
| Monthly family income (HK$) | |||
| <10,000 | 2 (9.5%) | 6 (28.6%) | 0.079 c |
| 10,000–19,999 | 7 (33.3%) | 10 (47.6%) | |
| ≥20,000–29,999 | 9 (42.9%) | 2 (9.5%) | |
| Don’t know | 3 (14.3%) | 3 (14.3%) | |
| Marital Status | |||
| Separated/divorced/widowed | 1 (4.8%) | 1 (4.8%) | 0.999 c |
| Married | 20 (95.2%) | 20 (95.2%) | |
| Number of children | |||
| 1 | 5 (23.8%) | 5 (23.8%) | 0.005 b |
| 2 | 14 (66.7%) | 5 (23.8%) | |
| ≥3 | 2 (9.5%) | 11 (52.4%) |
Variables marked with † are presented as mean (standard deviation), otherwise are frequency (%). a Independent t-test; b Chi-square test; c Fisher’s exact test.
Health behaviors related to cervical cancer and screening.
| Characteristics | Control ( | Intervention ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Family history of cervical cancer | |||
| No | 20 (95.2%) | 17 (81.0%) | 0.343 c |
| Yes | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (4.8%) | |
| Don’t know | 1 (4.8%) | 3 (14.3%) | |
| Have had any cervical disease before | |||
| No | 20 (95.2%) | 21 (100.0%) | 0.999 c |
| Yes | 1 (4.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Know the venue of clinics/centers providing cervical examinations | |||
| No | 12 (57.1%) | 15 (71.4%) | 0.334 b |
| Yes | 9 (42.9%) | 6 (28.6%) | |
| Have had regular body check-up | |||
| No | 16 (76.2%) | 15 (71.4%) | 0.726 b |
| Yes | 5 (23.8%) | 6 (28.6%) | |
| Have health insurance | |||
| No | 19 (90.5%) | 17 (81.0%) | 0.663 c |
| Yes | 2 (9.5%) | 4 (19.0%) | |
| Any doctor suggested the participant have a Pap test | |||
| No | 14 (66.7%) | 19 (90.5%) | 0.130 c |
| Yes | 7 (33.3%) | 2 (9.5%) | |
| Friends suggested the participant have a Pap test | |||
| No | 4 (19.0%) | 12 (57.1%) | 0.011 b |
| Yes | 17 (81.0%) | 9 (42.9%) | |
| Family suggested the participant have a Pap test | |||
| No | 12 (57.1%) | 17 (81.0%) | 0.095 b |
| Yes | 9 (42.9%) | 4 (19.0%) | |
| Ever received a reminder letter from doctor or healthcare organization for cervical examination | |||
| No | 16 (76.2%) | 21 (100.0%) | 0.048 c |
| Yes | 5 (23.8%) | 0 (0.0%) |
b Chi-square test; c Fisher’s exact test.
Primary and secondary outcomes between control and intervention groups.
| Outcomes | Control ( | Intervention ( | Cohen’s d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ever had a Pap test (at least 5 years ago) | ||||
| T0 | 12 (57.1%) | 6 (28.6%) | 0.061 | |
| T1 | 17 (81.0%) | 12 (57.1%) | 0.095 | |
| Change from No at T0 to Yes at T1 | 6 (28.6%) | 7 (33.3%) | 0.739 | |
| Willingness to undergo a Pap test within the next month | ||||
| T0 | 21 (100.0%) | 20 (95.2%) | 0.999 c | |
| T1 | 21 (100.0%) | 19 (90.5%) | 0.488 c | |
| Change from No at T0 to Yes at T1 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (4.8%) | 0.999 c | |
| Perceived susceptibility † | ||||
| T0 | 1.83 (0.95) | 1.79 (0.83) | 0.864 a | |
| T1 | 1.67 (0.80) | 1.98 (1.09) | 0.299 a | |
| Change (T1–T0) | −0.17 (0.98) | 0.19 (0.84) | 0.213 a | 0.39 |
| Perceived severity † | ||||
| T0 | 2.97 (0.83) | 2.83 (0.94) | 0.605 a | |
| T1 | 3.03 (1.13) | 3.56 (0.90) | 0.104 a | |
| Change (T1–T0) | 0.06 (1.27) | 0.73 (1.40) | 0.114 a | 0.50 |
| Perceived benefits † | ||||
| T0 | 4.00 (0.51) | 3.51 (0.59) | 0.007 a | |
| T1 | 4.12 (0.29) | 4.25 (0.37) | 0.231 a | |
| Change (T1–T0) | 0.12 (0.55) | 0.73 (0.60) | 0.001 a | 1.06 |
| Perceived barriers † | ||||
| T0 | 2.40 (0.67) | 2.85 (0.82) | 0.063 a | |
| T1 | 2.26 (0.48) | 2.07 (0.32) | 0.147 a | |
| Change (T1–T0) | −0.15 (0.82) | −0.78 (0.86) | 0.020 a | 0.75 |
| Self-efficacy † | ||||
| T0 | 2.95 (1.14) | 2.83 (1.32) | 0.741 a | |
| T1 | 3.49 (1.16) | 4.21 (0.90) | 0.032 a | |
| Change (T1–T0) | 0.54 (1.67) | 1.38 (1.12) | 0.062 a | 0.59 |
Variables marked with † are presented as mean (standard deviation), otherwise are frequency (%). a Independent t-test; c Fisher’s exact test.